Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Your Thought On This Lloyds Letter Plz


xbeanx3000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6514 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I sent off the PAFR letter with some changes, and the response I got is below. Also, below is the original letter I sent just so you can see the changes I made (sent to my local branch in hope of geting a personal reply, and I did). Any thoughts on the letter(s) would be appreciated. Thanks.

 

"Thank you for your letter regarding the refund of charges to your account.

 

You quote various recent articles made by the Office of Fair Trading which relate to credit card default fees, not to overdraft charges.

 

As a bank we disagree entirely with the comparisons being made between credit card default fees and current account overdraft charges as the legal and commercial basis for charging is different. We will not refund our overdraft charges as a result of customer complaints unless we have incorrectly applied the charges.

We make all our charges clear to our customers, both on thier statements and in our banking charges leaflet. By using our Telephone banking, Internet, ATM and free mobile banking text services, our customers can manage their accounts to avoid overdraft charges.

 

We have deleted or waived charges on your account on several occasions, and also explained on various occasion how the charging structure works and when charges will be applied to your account.

 

We take our responsibility to customer and customer service extremely seriously. We strongly believe that our policies, guidelines and processes treat our customer fairly and provide clear infomation. Our charging policies are constantly reviewed to ensure that we comply with all parts of the banking code and any relevant legislation.

 

I hope I've been able to answer the points you've raised with us. If not please let me know what else I can do to help.

 

We have done our best to resolve your complaint. But if you're not happy with our response for any reason, I have enclosed a copy of our leaflet 'how to voice your concerns' which gives you details about what to do.

 

You don't need to reply to this letter unless there is anything else you'd like me to help you with. If you need to talk to us again about this please contact us by 9th October. this is so we can get your infomation quickly. If you do contact us after this time we will, of course, still be able to help you but it may take us longer to find the infomation we need"

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

That's everything. Now my letter below:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My request

I have charges earmarked for September totalling £60 for going over my agreed overdraft, but it has come to my attention that these charges are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent consumer regulations. Therefore could I please have them removed or, if you have responded after they have been taken, refunded? If you say that they are lawful, then will you please demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put by as a result of my breaches, in order to reassure me that your penalties really do reflect your costs.

 

Additionally, it has now been confirmed that your particularly high level of penalties are considered to be unfair per se by the OFT who reported on the 5th April 2006 and are therefore presumed to be unlawful in the absence of specific proof to the contrary.

 

Your responsibilities

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I consider that your repeated representations that your charges are fair and reasonable are deceptive and that they have deceived me into agreeing to pay them in the past.

 

Your concealment of the true nature of your charges has prevented me from asserting my right until now

 

What I require

I understand that I could have charges refunded dating back a full 6 years, but this is not my intention. Therefore could you please just cancel/refund the current £60 earmark/charge only, and the other past charges will be forgotten.

 

My targets to resolve this matter

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive resolution.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline.

 

Yours faithfully,

---------------------------------------------------------------

Should I send the second letter now? Have I made any errors with the changes to the original PAFR letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

She makes it sound like I'm getting certain laws for credit cards confused with overdrafts. Kind of scares me.

 

I'll send the second letter now then.

 

Is this court business all done over the internet, from that Claim website? I'm disabled and wouldn't be able to make any outside appointments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can file your claim online no probs. Should the need arise for you to actually attend court, i'm sure there is a way that someone can represent you. there is a buddy system onsite. don't fret about it yet though, still some way to go (sorry)

regards

the train of thought has left the station, hope i was on the right platform!!

 

____________________________________________________

Lloyds TSB

prelim sent 06/07/06 response rec'd 14/07/06

LBA sent 20/07/06 response rec'd 27/07/06

Moneyclaim filed 22/08/06 Ack'd 30/08/06

Defence filed 26/09/06 AQ filed 12/10/06

hearing set for 10th Jan 2007

 

Cap One

prelim sent 2nd Nov 2006 First offer rec'd 14th Nov

any thoughts, suggestions or advice given by MBQ are done so without prejudice. All information I have, i have learned from this excellent site. If in any doubt, seek professsional advice.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, moltonbrownqueen. One last thing before I leave it for now. So far all of this is an 'earmark', should I wait until the money is taken (I can't really afford this), which would be in September? If so, it'll push me over my 14 day Prim letter I sent them. My concentration isn't too good and I might be making mistakes already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have taken charges before then you can send your next letter, and only detail those charges that have been taken.

 

Then when and if you need to issue a claim, by that time they would have taken the money that has been ear marked, so you can then include that amount as well.

 

If on the other hand they have never taken charges in the past and those that are due to be taken in September will be the first, then you'll need to wait until they have taken them.

Don't worry about going over your deadline, it's your deadline so if you don't take the next step for 3 or 4 weeks then thats fine all you have told them is they have at least 2 weeks, it's their good fortune that you will extend the deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a final update. As a result of refinancing my existing Lloyds loan (merging my overdraft into it), Lloyds has removed all the penalty earmarks on my account as a 'good gesture'. I'm not sure if this is a good thing as I didn't want to pay back my overdraft so soon, but I'll go with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...