Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HELP NEEDED ASAP - Disciplinary tomorrow!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

 

Carl had his meeting and the boss decided (reluctantly) not to give him a warning not before telling him he didn't have to consider any of the evidence carl had and telling him he wasn't allowed any paperwork in the meeting!!!

 

We haven't had it in writing yet and the boss is off for 2 weeks, he has told one of his lackies to give the written result to carl on tuesday. He started having a go at carl fri am about his paperwork that needs to be filled in by the end of that day, demanding it at 10am, I think so he could have a go at him for not having already done it! FOOL!!! He is looking for reasons now....he is also making one rule for carl and not the others. Like carl cant use the van outside of work but everyone else can, he cant use is mobile during the day but the others can, no one else fills in milage sheets and usually no one takes a break during the day and they all fin early on a fri....carl now has to have his breaks and fin at 5 when everyone else can fin at 2.30????

 

shall he make a grievance complaint that he is being victimised? will it mak a difference to his redundancy? also, does the boss have to try to redeploy him? he has just taken on another driver so that side of the business is doing fine. Carl heard him the phone (he should really keep him voice down!!!) saying, "so if I close the engineering side down I can't take anyone else on for 2 months?" he is just being a sneak!

 

Any advice would be appreciated....you have all been brilliant upto now....thanks

 

Karen

 

since then carl has heard more phone conversations basically to the effect that he is going to make carl redundant....carl has been there 18months so wont be entitled to any redundancy pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This complaint about racist language that Carl made;

Did he complain to his Boss verbally or in writing?

What action, if any, has his Boss taken about resolving this complaint?

(Other than this current discipllinary action.)

 

 

Sorry...missed that one!! He complained verbally and the boss asked the other person not to do it anymore...he has used racist lang since though in general conversation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Grievance is the way to go here.

I suggest a simple letter, something along the lines of:

 

Due to recent events at work I believe that I am being victimised.

I would like to request a formal Grievance hearing to discuss the matter.

I would appreciate a written response to this request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter asks for a written response. If they wish to pretend ignorance of the details they can write and ask for clarification.

 

I do think though that Carl needs to have all the issues listed for his own reference though. From his initial complaint right through to the most recent overheard loud phone calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...