Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Natwest Bank Charges and Default !!!PLEASE HELP!!!


musky
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder of somebody could help me out on this forum. I have been having an ongoing problem with Natwest for a number of years and I have been told by an Adjudicator of the Financial ombudman that they are siding with Natwest.

 

The problem is the following:

 

  • I obtained from Natwest a list of charges on my current account and asked for them back
  • After asking for a list of charges I informed Natwest the I disputed the balance
  • The charges added up to more than I owed on the overdraft
  • Natwest offered me some of the money back but I refused and said I wanted all the money
  • 2 months later a default was added to my credit file

Now I am left with a damaging default on my credit file and an outstanding debt, are they allowed to add a default when the balance is in dispute?

 

Natwests arguement is that I agreed a £10 per month payment plan to clear the balance that was made up entirely of charges, I paid this amount to them once to get rid of them but I have no recolection of agreeing to a £10 per month payment plan. Natwest say the default was added becuase I did not stick to the £10 per month verbal payment plan.

 

Are they correct in adding a default to my credit file when the balance is in dispute?

 

If I agreed to a £10 per month payment plan they surely they need to prove it.

 

I would like to take them to court in order to get them to remove this default, please can some kind person at CAG help me..

 

Thanks very much

Ask natwest for a transcript of the call and evidence that the payment plan agreement was sent to you which is a requirement. If they are reliant merely on notes on the account then you need to ask natwest to provide a written statement and a final response to take this to the FOS for maladministration of your account(not just bank error).

 

When did you speak with the FOS?(we might be able to work on this one if you still have time to respond to them).

Are you aware that because the issue relates to bank charges that the case will be stayed pending the outcome of the OFT test case issues?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold fire for now. I have asked someone I know is good on the FOS to take a look at the thread and I am sure they can advise you.

  • Haha 1

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you check on your statements on 10th July 2007 for a £10 deposit on the account?

 

Can you post up the narrative on the statement

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

BINGO!!!

You missed the most important bit. You changed your address on the telephone which meant that because it was updated overnight you could never have received the payment plan agreement since it would have been sent to the wrong address.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the story with the 600 odd paid into your account? did you agree to this and if so under what terms?

 

are there any facts stated in that letter that you disagree with?

Don't forget these questions as well. Kraken1 is very well versed in FOS complaints and was the person I asked to take a look at the thread ;)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...