Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

JD Williams / Naturally Close / Reliable Collections


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5364 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All

 

I am having a bit of a nightmare getting the info from the above. I have decided to dispute this owing to all the charges they keep applying to my account - its simply ridiculous.

 

I initially sent them over a CCA request, to which they replied but only sent me a true copy.......it didnt have my signature on it or a date so from what i have seen on here is not enforceable.

 

I have since sent of A SAR request, however they have now sent me through a form that i need to fill out and sign without it they can't send me the info i request. I also need to get a witness to sign it and confirm that is me asking for this info, its totally ridiculous, who else would i be.

 

If i dont supply them with this info they will assume i do not want to follow through with my request.

 

Really not sure what to do now. Is there any other way around?

 

I am being bombarded with letters, charges and phonecalls despite saying the account is in dispute and having sent the letter re telephone harassment.

 

Why cant they just supply me with what i ask for!

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i have read the thread about signatures and putting aline through or somehting but to be honest it is such an odd request. They have asked for my address, when i want the information from and to and also what i want sent to me, all of which was covered in the SAR i sent from here. As they are a large company encompassing a number of other catalogue names too they ask me to say if i have ordered from any of the those or need information that may rely on information from any one of their other companies, if i do its £10 each. Its all quite confusing TBH, also they say a number of times that they may not be able to send certain info if it violates other terms or something grrrr, i can see it going nowhere and in the mean time they keep harrassing me and slapping on charges!

 

Thank you for the letter template too, i shall send that off and see what they come back with.

 

Thank you both so much for replying so promptly!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmn thats what i would have thought. I could see this dragging out and them using it as a way to get lots of £10's out of someone. So tricky.

 

I will send the letter for a third time along with your template and also warn that if they persist i will report them.

 

I am not convinced it will work but we shall see :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OK, now for the next thrilling installment. On the 5th i received a letter from Naturally close / aka fashion world / JD Williams ( manchester address - lever street), saying:

 

I refer to my letter of the 7th JUly 2009 advising that if we did not hear from you by the 30th of July 2009 we would regard your application abandoned. As we have not heard from you I will make arrangements to close your file.

I was just formulating a reply, as i had actually responded to them and had posted off all the things suggested in this thread along with another £10 payment which i referred to in the letter as being the money sent through again for the SAR, i told them i had cancelled the other one as they had quite clearly lost it. All in all i wasn't worried and thought this was just them trying to buy time............i know they got the letter as i sent it recorded delivery and it was signed for about a week ago, i also know they received it because....

Today i got a letter from Reliable Collections stating "payment receipt"! It then twitters on about it wasn't within the agreed plan rate blah blah blah and once again thanks for my payment.

Its not showing on my account yet but either this is a dummy / bluff letter or they have taken the 10.00 i sent in for the SAR as payment! Can they do that???

What do i do now.

I was so angry i nearly picked up the phone to them but i know that would be silly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all

 

Just an update for you all. I sent another letter out reiterating everything i had requested before and sent them copies of past letters i had sent and also stipulated that the 10.00 was clearly marked for use to process my subject access request.

 

They sent one reply re signatures that they had already sent so i ignored. The letter i received today was long but a bit pointless. Still no subject access received, nothing mentioned about it in the letter.

 

They instead insisted that there contact towards me was fair and not harrassment. That i still owed them and had fallen into serious arrears......they also popped in a letter informing me how i could complain to them!!!!

 

They say i opened the account back in 2006 but i thought it was earlier than that.

 

They also helpfully informed me that to help me out they had reduced monthly payments to 10.00 and my next one was due on the 27th of this month.

 

I guess i will pen one more letter as perhaps they really are that dim but all in all am livid!!

 

I Feel as though i am going barking mad!

 

I know i am going to have to report, i guess i was just hoping that they would honour my SAR request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bigpaddy, I concurr with dpick. They appear to be one and the same. All it means is that you get bombarded with letters! As soon as i recieve a letter from one i also get another one sent in from reliable, i just write everything to jdwilliams, naturally close and reliable.

 

As i say seems to be going round and round in circles and makes for a very large file but atleast you have all the bases covered!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so i have finally received some information from JDWilliams in relation to my SAR request.

 

Have looked through it all but cant find an agreement anywhere neither can i see copies of all past statements sent, they also haven't included all my e-mail contact or letters sent to them neither do they show all the letters they have bombarded me with.

 

So are they holding some info back? Can they do that?

 

Should i now send a non compliance? Is there any chance that they dont have any agreement for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...