Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bidilly's post (long story... sorry)


Bidilly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6621 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly, delighted to find this forum, it is an invaluable resource.

 

I have a rather long and involved dispute with the Co-Op; I have read the FAQs, but hopefully it will become clear why I feel it necessary to ask for advice outside the FAQ section.

 

In Feb 2004, I went to my bank branch to request a fixed loan of £1000 to clear my overdraft. The rates then advertised for Personal Loans were 6.9%, which seemed fine to me. The adviser at the bank, however, listened to my plans for a business, and suggested a flexiloan, which was then a new product. She told me that the rate would be 9.9%, but I would have up to £7000 available to aid in funding the business. However, after completing the application procedure on the computer, she "discovered" that she did not have a copy of the terms and conditions, nor did she have an agreement for me to sign. She set up the loan, and told me that she would forward the relevant paperwork in the "next few days".

 

When I had waited a week, I called into the branch, but there was still no paperwork; it was suggested that I contact the head office, which I did.

 

For the next ten months, I seemed to be constantly in contact with the office responsible for the loan, but I could not get anyone to believe that I had never signed a loan agreement, or even seen the terms and conditions.

 

Looking back now, I realise it seems naive, but I trusted that everything would be above board... it's a bank, right? They don't make mistakes, this was just an oversight.

 

However, the date on which they took the payment kept changing (moving forward in the month), and they seemed incapable of giving me an accurate date; I was forever transferring money into the account to cover the latest payment, but still being charged because the cash was not there AT THE MOMENT THAT THE PAYMENT WAS TAKEN (being a nightbird, I was checking the account online in the early hours, seeing the payment had been taken early again, and putting the money in within minutes); despite the fact that only the computers knew I had gone overdrawn, I was being charged for unauthorised overdrawings.

 

Eventually, I got most of these charges refunded, but then the bank insisted that they would close my account due to consistent mismanagement. I fought this, and got an admission that it was their fault, since they were incapable of giving an accurate date for the payments.

 

Then they made a payment in error into the current account. I notified them of this when I realised what had happened, and offered an arrangement to repay the sum (it looked like a legitimate repayment and only about six weeks later did I realise it was a duplicate). Rather than come to an agreement, the bank sent me a notification they would recover the money in full one week later. The only way to cover this was to use more of the flexiloan.

 

By November 2004 I was very hacked off. I went to see my local consumer protection people, who pointed out that since I had never signed an agreement, I was not liable for the loan. Legally, maybe, but morally, of course, I felt that I was.

 

I stopped all further payments on the loan and informed the bank that I was refusing to make any further payments until I had a copy of the agreement I had supposedly signed. Of course, they finally had to admit that there was no such form, and posted out agreement and terms.

 

NOW I discovered that I had actually been paying 13.9% all this time! I amended the form to the terms I had originally been quoted, and sent it back with a letter explaining that I expected a reduction in the balance to reflect the interest that SHOULD have been charged according to the adviser's original sales pitch; at the same time, I indicated that I was no longer prepared to give the bank my current acount business, and so would be closing that account.

 

Both form and letter were returned to me a few days later, without comment, but stamped with the bank's "received" stamp and the date.

 

Now I was really mad. I immediately phoned the bank, and told them I would be closing the account immediately all outstanding debits (cheques etc.) had been drawn on the account. I asked for, and was given, a verbal agreement to a £1000 overdraft for one month to allow the outstanding debits to clear, and asked for a final balance to be sent to me to close the account once all the debits had gone through.

 

Two days later, I got a letter informing me that I had gone overdrawn without agreement and was being charged... daily, the same charge would be applied until my account was in credit.

 

I wrote again, drawing their attention to the agreement to an overdraft to facilitate closure of the account. Foolishly, I enclosed the earlier letter (the original) to prove that I had already informed them, and they were aware, of my intention to close the account, plus the signed agreement.

 

I then got a letter stating that the matter was "under investigation", and would be responded to in seven days. Then another. And another. And another. Eventually, five weeks later, I got a reply stating that they had no record of my phone call; the charges would stand. They would, however, reduce the loan interest in future to 9.9%.

 

I then rang the signatory of the letter, and (worn down by this point) accepted a halving of the charges, and the backdated reduction of the loan balance by the amount they had already charged in excess of the 9.9%. They sent out forms for a new loan, and a direct debit mandate, and I returned them.

 

Then nothing happened between March 2005 and September 2005. No follow-up, no mandate activated on my new account elsewhere, no contact. By now, I felt it was no longer my job to chase them, having spent a fortune in time, phone calls and letters already. Then in September, I received another call. Most apologetic that the matter had been "overlooked". After some toing and froing, I got them back to the position we had agreed in March. This still involved £400 of charges, as opposed to the £800 they originally wanted, but I was still feeling like all I wanted was to settle it, even at that ludicrous cost.

 

This time, rather than a loan, it was a simple 3 months of payments then the loan would be set up. I sent 3 post-dated cheques (recorded), checked at the royal mail website that they had been delivered, and waited.

 

And waited. Nothing went through, no contact came from the bank. Until I started getting phone calls 3 weeks ago from the bank's solicitors. I very patiently explained that I disputed the amount (of course, it had gone back to the original 13.9%, plus late payment charges, plus a mountain of charges on the current account). I was told that they would have to refer the matter back to the bank, but either they or the bank would phone me.

 

No phone call, but a letter to the effect that the bank had done all they felt they could, and would now pass the matter to an outside agency.

 

Of course, I'm now preparing a full case to refer to the ombudsman, and awaiting contact from the "outside agency".

 

But my questions for forummers in general are:

 

1) How will the "outside agency" be able to react when told the sums are in dispute?

 

2) Should (indeed can) I launch a counterclaim for the value of the charges and excess interest, bearing in mind that I have not actually paid them yet?

 

3) Does anybody have any idea what else I should be doing?

 

Sorry for going on so long, I will be very appreciative of anyone's advice in this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I forgot to mention; despite acknowledging the second "account closing" letter, and the completed loan agreement, the person who dealt with the investigation claimed that the envelope had been opened elsewhere and she had "no record" of the first account closing letter (the one that they had stamped as received and then returned to me without comment, then sent back to them in the same envelope as the second and the loan agreement)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely story - "Oh how we laughed...!"

 

Well I do think that you need to approach an outside agency. I think that HM Court Service will do very nicely.

 

Can you condense this down please to something a bit more manageable.

 

It would be nice to know how much they say that you owe them. How much you say that you have paid in charges andinterest and generally get a succinct chronology. We can go from there

 

I am assuming that you have all of the documents to hand including the contract which you amended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your interest; "all the documents to hand" - not quite, as I've just moved house and everything is packed away :-) - but they are in my possession.

 

I'll work on condensing it down for you and re-post a more succinct version shortly with figures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6621 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...