Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you never use or give an email  2nd class stamp with free proof of posting from any po counter dx
    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.   It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.   Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

S.C Leatham - Locke LL.B


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5606 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i got this letter this moring from

 

S.C Leatham - Locke LL.B.

 

It says

 

We refer to the above matter which concerns your outstandomg account with paypal.

 

We hereby inform you that we have today reviewed a detailed history of your account and it is our intention to recommend to our client that they prepare the necessary papers for the issus of legal proceedings.

 

Unless we recived full payment of the outstanding balance within 72 hours, but to proceed with this recommendation.

 

to discuss this matter futher please call one of our agents on 0870 903 2360 before 72 hour period has elapsed.

 

 

 

At the bottom of the letter is says

 

S.C Leatham - Locke LL.B

 

Pre-ligation Department

NCO Europe Limited.

 

What should i do?, the letter is dated 12march and today is the 21 march?, i dont have a clue what to do and really lost

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MR TON,

 

Yes i have had a paypal account, i think it is following my other letter i had a while back this is the topic

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/186471-nco-europe-paypal-scared.html

 

I think its a DCA i am unsure and i dont know what to do lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SC Leatham Locke is NOT a solicitor. If he has told you he is, or made you think that he is, then make sure you report this to the Solicitors regulation Authority. To let people think you are a solicitor when you are not is a criminal offence

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers guys for the info.

 

This has been going on for a few motnhs now guys and i am getting sick of it, anyway i can get them to stop.

 

Is any legal action going to happen to me if i dont pay?.

 

I just want them to go away and im not paying for somthing i got scammed on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next thing you will get is a card telling you that MR Brown will call on Tuesday. Of course he doesn't exist and no one will call. If you don't intend to pay NCO.. Write to them recorded delivery and tell them you are not going to pay them, no matter how many threat-o-grams they send, so they might as well scurry back under their stone and stop wasting their time and yours

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next thing you will get is a card telling you that MR Brown will call on Tuesday. Of course he doesn't exist and no one will call. If you don't intend to pay NCO.. Write to them recorded delivery and tell them you are not going to pay them, no matter how many threat-o-grams they send, so they might as well scurry back under their stone and stop wasting their time and yours

 

Haha, i already had one of thos.

 

So these letters im getting is nothing to worrie about.

 

Do i need to send a any letters or anything off asking for info or stuff ect?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...