Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5570 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all - my story is similar to most.

 

I was paying by installments on a council tax debt to Equita which I had arranged on receiving the initial letter from them telling me the council had transferred the collection to them.

 

I missed a payment by a week, so phoned up but was told "it's been passed to Mr ***** and we can't talk to you, you can only talk to him".

 

Speaking to the bailiff, I found out the outstanding balance was £200 more than I expected, however neither he nor the call-centre would give me a breakdown - it was the "pay-up in 24 hours or else".

 

Therefore I just paid the whole amount, thinking that I could claim back the fees later. Big mistake. After I paid up, they then sent me the following breakdown of charges on request:

 

Bailiff fee : £88.50

Enforcement Fee : £160

 

As you can see, both are rather peculiar, seeing that I thought the most fees they could charge was £42.50 - how did they get to £88.50? The bailiff never entered my property at all.

 

So I sent a letter saying that I contested the charges levied. I have now received a reply which basically says "the fees reflect the action taken."

 

So what to do now? - I have drafted one letter stating the relevant legislation and statutory instruments but I am guessing I will be fobbed off again. Any suggestions?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that depends on you, of course they will try to fob you off that is what they are trained to do.

 

Your best way forward is to start from the beginning and establish exactly what the bailiffs did and didn't do.

 

Write to the bailiffs and ask them for a screenshot of your account, and also ask them for evidence of any visits made, and what vehicles were used.

 

Go back to your paperwork, get the bailiffs name and check with the Ministry of Justice that he actually does possess a certificate granted by the court, and find out when that certificate was granted.

 

You are entitled to this information, yes they may try to put you off, because they don't want you to have it.

That's because they know what you will do with it.

 

If you still owe money to the council then the best that you can hope for is to have any unlawful or excessive bailiff fees offset against your debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this. No I do not owe anything to the cancel anymore, it is more the fact that I have been charged over £200 more than I should have that I am trying to claim back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they never gained entry into the property and I did not sign a thing. I do not have a shed etc, or a car so they could not of claimed that as a levy. As it is the letter he posted showed no total or breakdown of charges. When I asked him about the charges he said "he was not allowed to talk about that", but that of course is circumstantial and unproveable evidence.

 

All of the communications were done on the phone. As far as I am concerned he put one letter through the door on a Friday, I phoned him immediately when i got home and paid by card on the Monday.

 

Believe me, I know that Bailiffs are like Vampires - you never invite one into your house! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...