Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCJ or DECREE: Minute to recall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5586 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I was issued with a CCJ/Decree in 2006. It was for a debt owed to a local council (not council tax, former employee). I was granted an order to pay but one thing led to another and i was unable to stick to the order which would have seen the debt cleared over a 12 month period (financial and marriage difficulties). I still owe approx £500, the original decree summary cause was for £980. It has since transpired that the original amount present to the court was inaccurate and should have been £180 less, this is by the councils own admission and they have deducted it from my debt. Anyway, i now have the means to pay the debt but would like the decree set aside for obvious credit worthiness reason. I plan to lodge a minute of recall with a sworn affidavit in support.

What do you think? This is a draft copy, not really sure what i am doing so any help is appreciated.

What am i trying to achieve?

I want to pay the full outstanding debt, but wish to have the ccj/decree set aside also, as to improve my credit worthiness.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rule 24.1(1)

FORM 30

 

Minute for recall of decree

 

Sheriff Court: Edinburgh

Court ref. no.: XXXXX/06

City of Edinburgh Council (pursuer) against Mr Stephen XXXXXXX(defender).

The pursuer moves the court to recall the decree pronounced on XX-XXXX 2006 in this case.

Reason for failure to appear or be represented:

I, the defender, sought and was granted a time to pay order. I agreed with the full amount of decree at the time, but now only agree with part of the amount. I also applied for time to pay as I wouldn’t be required to attend court. My desire not to attend court was due to me suffering from high levels of stress at the time (due to the failing of my marriage).

Proposed defence/answer:

I, the defender, respectfully request that the honourable court recall and set aside the decree. The following is the basis on which I make this request:

1: I agreed with the full amount of decree at the time, but now only agree with part of the amount. I believe that the evidence presented to the court by the pursuer when the decree was sought was inaccurate, namely, in the sum owed. The pursuer stated that the sum owed by the defender was £981.29, but I now know this sum to be inaccurate. The sum should have been significantly less and I have evidence to collaborate this fact.

2: There is a further, although minor, inaccuracy on the decree, namely, the defenders forename is spelt incorrectly. The defender’s name is Stephen XXXXXXX, yet on the decree the defender’s name is spelt Steven XXXXXXX. This inaccuracy has been pointed out to the pursuer on more than one occasion yet they have failed to rectify this error.

3: I, the defender, do not recall, and therefore believe, I was not given 28 days notice in order to pay the decree.

I, the defender, acknowledge that I owe a sum of money to the pursuer. I do not bring this action before your Lordships in an attempt to avoid paying this debt, but I do require clarification on what monies are owed, given the fact that the initial sum presented by the pursuer was incorrect. I respectfully request the decree be set aside and a new hearing takes place. Should the honourable court recall and set aside the decree pending a new hearing, and further, make a judgement on the sum owed by the defender at such a hearing, it will be the defenders intention to pay the said sum, in full, immediately after the judgement.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...