Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bailiff Fees on Ctax debt already paid to the council - helpqueries - help please :D


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5602 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Could anyone advise me please?

 

I defaulted on Council Tax and it has ended in the hands of the bailiffs.

 

Due to advice l have learned in these forums I paid my council tax owed in full to the council offices early this week. (where the two women got reallly flustered at the payment desk, and I heard one say to the other - 'I'm going to get it in the neck for this!', before passing me on to a superior)

 

I now believe that the bailiffs have no enforceable rights (they are now only chasing their fees) - is this correct please?

 

I have read in numerous posts that Bailiffs are only allowed to charge for the first 2 letters. I have never interacted with the bailiff until today when I phoned and asked for a breakdown of charges.

 

The ensuing conversation has been recorded by me and went like this;

 

Basically he said that when the debt was passed to them it was a certain amount which i have worked out was the council tax owed plus 42.50! (this is the letters fee right?). He says now that i owe him £155 for his attendance and for when he brings the van!(is this in the future?!) I asked for the breakdown and he replied that that was basically it. I said 'so this is a standard fee?' He replied yes and that there was a £60 for his next visit but he was going to waive this as he didn't know whether I had been on holiday or something??!

 

Do I just owe the company the 2 standard letter fee of 42-50?

What about court costs - where do I pay them/what happens with this?:

I had an issue summons of £40 and liability order of £50 - are these within the 'standard fee' quoted by the bailiff?

 

Can I pay the bailiffs by cheque for the two letters ?- which I would prefer to do and send it to their main office rather than face the bailiff.

It says in print on his last letter he posted which was FINAL NOTICE -Cheques not accepted. I have until early next week to make a payment

 

Thanks in advance for any gems of wisdom xx

 

I await with great faith for a reply :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Double check with the council that the account is definately clear, quite often the will pay the bailiff first before clearing the account, so it is very important that you check.

 

My opinon is that so long as the account is clear then the liability order that the bailiff was collecting under has now gone, so you owing them any money is a civil matter and can only be claimed through a small claims court. Which is very doubtful they would do.

 

Am I take from you post that the bailiff has never visited your property? If so then the amount a bailiff can charge is ziltch! The amount a bailiff can charge is set in a statutory fee scale.

 

There is no provision in the scale for charging fees for letters, phonecalls, handling a case etc etc

 

The Council Tax Administration & Enforcement (Amendment) 1993. Si 773 amended by Si 295 0f 1998, Si 768 of 2003 and Si 3395 of 2006

 

First visit fee: £24.50 This is for a first attendance to levy but where a levy does not takes place. (For example where you are not in)

 

The bailiff can charge a levy fee if they levy but he cannot charge both amounts on the same occasion.

 

Second visit fee: £18.00 Despite any further visits, the bailiff can only charge for a maximum of 2 visits.

 

Levy Fee: Under this heading the bailiff can charge £24.50 for the first £100, and 4% on the next £400 etc.

 

First £100 £24.50

Next £400 @ 4%

Remaining £100 @ 2.5%

 

Walking posession order £12

 

This is the link to the nationaldebtline website, the fees a bailiff can charge whilst collecting council tax are at the bottom of the page.

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.u k/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=02_bai liffs_and_council_tax

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do argue with you, then write to them and ask them to send you a detailed breakdown of the fees that they have applied to your account, tell them that if you find any inconsistencies with The Council Tax Administration & Enforcement (Amendment) 1993. Si 773 amended by Si 295 0f 1998, Si 768 of 2003 and Si 3395 of 2006 fee scale then you will have no hesitation in making a Form 4 complaint against the bailiff you spoke to.

 

Lastly dont speak to them on the phone anymore, they will only tell you porkies and you will have no proof of the conversation.

 

SEND EVERYTHING IN WRITING, SEND IT RECORDED, KEEP A COPY and SEND A COPY TO YOUR LOCAL COUNCIL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scatz - thanks so much for your prompt reply - much appreciated. I have just now called the council and my account is nil - I have asked for a letter confirming this (and also taped the conversation). Do you know anything about the court costs at all? Are they still in effect? I rang the courts who said that everything was with the council so I'm really at a loss as to where these monies stand. If you are as baffled as I could you suggest anywhere where I could go to find out?

 

Thanks again

 

*the bailiff has visited my property and posted letters. He has been 3 times further this week but i have never answered the door

Link to post
Share on other sites

The costs for the liability order would have been added to your council tax bill, which according to the council is now settled.

 

As for the bailiff costs, its really up to you, either ignore them or pay the £42.50 for the 1st and 2nd that they are entitled to charge, but they havent levied so no further charges can be added. A levy is when the bailiff makes a list of your goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Bailiff Fees on Ctax debt already paid to the council - helpqueries - help please :D
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...