Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

non-compliance of subject access request


frettful38
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Hope everyone had a good xmas,

 

Please could anyone advise me on what to do next. I sent my bank a subject access request on the 10th Dec 08 and they wrote back to me on the 16th Dec 08 with the exact letter that I have posted below. They say they require my signature. In reply to their letter dated 16/12/08 I sent back a letter that I do not need to send my signature and all the information which I got off this site regarding signatures. But they again sent me exactly the same letter again and I do not know what to reply to this now. I think the 40 days expire on the 19th January 2009 from 10th December 08. Please could someone tell me what to do now, thanks in advance for any help.:)

 

http://i450.photobucket.com/albums/qq223/sophiak_bucket/CCF29122008_00000.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot davey77, I will have read tonight and send them a letter. They are not chasing me for any debt its just that I wanted to see what is actually in my subject access report, just in case may need it in the future, and with the way the economy and recession is going you never can be too sure can you. I also would like to know of how many charges I been charged too.

 

Thanks very much for all your help, take care, and have a happy new year.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved a letter today from HSBC saying that they would like mu husband to go to his local branch so that they can confirm his identity as the signature he sent before did not match with theirs. So we will have to go to our local branch before they send us any subject access request , what a waste of time hey, they are playing hard to get, but lets see what happens,

 

Do we have to go to the branch to prove identity or should we just reply saying that the deadline of 40 days expires on ....... and will not go to the branch for this uneccessary waste of time.

 

Please advise wether it is best to go or write to them saying something else,

 

Thanks everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for the advice I think we will not go and wait for the 40 days to expire then carry on with the next step of the non-compliance of S.A.R, because why should we have to go out of our way to prove who we are, like it says they are quite happy to send us statements and letters without asking for any I.D so why now. Anyway they didn't send this letter recorded delivery so guess I could say we didn't receive it :D, and just go ahead with the next stage. Probably be more easy to go and prove to them signature but we are not here to make things easy for them anymore than they have made for us, this lesson we have learned from them. :rolleyes:

 

If they listened to us in the 1st place then I am sure no one would be in the position they are in today. So I will keep all up to date with the latest and thanks again,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that bit of good advice as you said it is better to stick to the truth we don't want to add guilt to the rest of the problems, will keep that in mind and just wait for the 40 days to end,

 

Take care and have a happy new year, will let you know of the progress,:D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks dcking,

Thats a cool idea and will definitely give it a try, I 've loads of red pens lying about time I used them before the ink dries up

 

I have sent a cca request to my bank about my credit card and lets see what they send back, fingers crossed it won't be signed, but I have every intention to pay but would be better without the high interest rate I am on 19%. If it is unenforceable that would be so cool so whatever I paid would come off the debt. I paid £100.0 last month £46.00 was taken for interest, what a rip off hey.:rolleyes:

Edited by frettful38
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh right I get it, thanks for that, well I will find a way to cross that bridge when I come to it, I have 8 more days for the 40 days of the S.A.R I sent. I will keep all posted on the progress, I have sent a cca request too a few days ago lets see what they send back

 

Thanks davey77 for explaining take care for now :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks davey77,

Have not heard anything yet, but before I complain to the I.C.O don't I have to send them a letter before warning. I mean after the forty days are up do I complain straight to the I.C.O or are there a couple of letters I have to send warning them in advance.

 

Thanks for reply in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Davey77,

 

Don't worry I will follow it through, I am just on my way to my Post Office to post this LBA letter to them. I will let you know what happens.

 

I think this site has bought a lot of peace of mind to many people including myself. People did not know what rights they had or how to execute them. I wish I had found it earlier, but better late than never hey :)

In the past as soon as ever got a letter from a DCA I would pay up there & then including all the charges, even if I didn't do it I'd say I did. I think thats how these people scare us in to paying, and frankly I have had enough being scared, time for us to fight back. Thanks for advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think these S.A R's are brilliant. Its been years and I mean years that I have been trying to get information out of solicitors and various companies in the past. I even tried going through solicitors to get the information that I needed, I wrote loads of letters requesting this too, but never did I ever get a satisfactory response.

Now when I discovered what a S.A.R was you can understand how relieved I was. I know what I wanted to ask them but did not know the right words, but the S.A.R sums everything up in one hit.

I have received 3 S.A.R's back from out of the nine I have sent and so far all three of them are dodgy. I have found a lot of info in them that I was not aware of, boy this is going to be a lonnnnnnnnnnnnng investigation for me. But I have learned a lot from this site and its wonderful people, and basically found out much more than I needed,

 

So just a general thank-you to everyone for all they have done so far, :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that supasnooper for that very informative reply. I will just wait to see tomorrow's post, if I do not hear anything then I will do what you have advised above,

 

 

Once again thanks very much for everything,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good advice davey77 and just as I thought, I have sent them three. I don't think I will do anymore. Personally I thinks its better doing it yourself, because when you involve a third party sometimes they can make the situation worse than it already is and I am speaking from experience.

 

I will wait and see what reply I get, if it is not satisfactory result then I will have to do it myself, and I agree with your comments about these regulatory bodies 100%.

 

Thanks for your advice and let you know what happensxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Thanks palomino for your advice much appreciated xxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You beat me through it scarletpimpernel,

 

I think your right too, I think it will be better to cut out the middle man and go straight for the kill. That's what they have been doing, I will wait a few more days and start court proceedings with the help of you great people.

 

Waiting for the ICO will only take more longer, and we really want to get things moving.

 

Take care and thanks for your help. xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...