Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Pocock V Lloyds


mmaarrkk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6543 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Sent off intial letter last week 11.07.2006, (as below)

 

Dear Sirs,

I am writing to you to reclaim the bank charges that you have charged me over the past 2 years. I have recently found out that the said charges are not legally enforcable because they are not a fair representation of the costs incurred to yourselves and feel these charges are very unfair and have sometimes forced me into a circle of spiralling debt. I have tallied up the total and it amounts to *** pounds sterling.

The charges have been made to account number ***, sort code *** which is held at the Hornchurch branch.

All the charges are either returned direct debits , excess overdraft or returned cheque charges I have not included the overdraft interest as I feel thats a fair representation, there are 20 instances of charges, sometimes they ecompass more then one charge. I am currently paying 7pounds a month for the privalege of having an account with yourselves and my family and family business also have large accounts with yourselves. I appericate you are a good bank but if i am not refunded the money which is rightfully mine I will be forced to take legal action against yourselves for the amount mentioned above. Please see below for a breakdown of aforementioned charges.

 

 

1 10Jan05 CHG UNPAID CHEQUE 30.00 30

 

 

I look forward to receiving your response.

Regards

Mark Pocock

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved a standard reply back today, taken 4 days to get here though nice!.

 

Basically saying sorry that i am not happy with the charges and that like any business they feel its fair to make charges because of the extra work involved (like saying no to another bank if theres not enough money in the account to cover a cheque? and all the work involved in the fully automated dd system yea right). says a few other things, finishes off with saying they cannt agree to refund the charges as they feel they are fair, and that if i am still not happy i should inform her and / or the financial ombusman. If i havent replied by September 9th 2006 then she will take it as closed.

 

Her being Mandy Horton, Assistant manager

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now reparing to send the LBA which i will do before close of play today...

 

My Address

 

 

Customer Service Recovery Centre

125 Colmore Row

Birmingham

B3 3SF

 

 

Your Ref :BHAM/MH/CC/893260

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:***

SORT NUMBER ***

 

 

I am very disappointed that you have failed to acknowledge the lawful right i have to refund the charges after my letter of the 11/07/2006

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

 

I calculate that you have taken £817

I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original letter of the 11/07/2006

 

 

List Of charges ****

 

 

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

 

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Mark Pocock

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now reparing to send the LBA which i will do before close of play today...

 

you have a long road ahead but keep replying to the letters as they come one by one and eventually you will get there. I sued LLoyds TSB on behalf of my son and although they huffed and puffed they paid up in the end. Took us about two and half months all in all but got there eventually 3 days before the court case was scheduled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...