Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Log Book Loans - default notice and BoS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5787 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I'm about to launch a claim against LBL for the return of letter charges. Whilst I'm doing so, I thought I would add a request for the Judge to make a ruling on whether the agreement is an "extortionate credit bargain" (CCA1974), or alternatively if there's an unfair relationship (CCA2006).

 

I've also seen references to the agreement being unenforceable, and/or the Bill of Sale being incorrect.

 

Has anyone got any pointers to help me draft my PoC please?

 

TIA

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi All

 

I'm in a bit of a time-sensitive pickle with this lot - leaving aside the daftness of getting involved in the first place (original loan was a while back, then it's been re-loaned a few times since I can never seem to completely pay them off), I've managed to get myself behind by a month. Whilst my car's not worth a lot, my plans to by a new car this month have been scuppered by a cloned debit card - otherwise I'd have just got a new cheap runabout and let them take the car.

 

Reading on here, I see that the Bill of Sale could well be invalid - I don't think their Default Notice is what's required either (let's leave aside the credit agreement at the moment!):

 

Default notice (which is for a different date of agreement - states 21st Aug 07 whereas the agreement was dated 20th Aug 07):

scan0018.jpg

 

Now, reading the Bill of Sale, whilst it does have a lot of words in (:D) it doesn't appear to have the mandatory form as laid out in the schedule of section 9 of the Bills of Sale Act (1878) Amendment Act 1882 (c.43) (here: Bills of Sale Act (1878) Amendment Act 1882 (c.43) - Statute Law Database).

 

It starts off with "This Bill of sale made this 20 August 2007" rather than "This Indenture made the day of ", and whilst the wording goes on, it's not the same as the form laid out (I can scan it in tonight if that'll help?)

 

It's also witnessed by the guy who gave me the loan, who has put his address as "Log Book Loans" - that doesn't seem to me to be an attestation by a witness not party to the bill

 

I'll be asking LBL to provide the sealed copy of the BoS as I can't afford £40 to do a search at the High Court (not to mention I'm pushed on time as the default notice expires on Tuesday next week!)

 

Question is, once I've determined that the BoS is invalid, what do I do then?

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here's the Bill of Sale:

 

Page 1

scan0020.jpg

 

Page 2

scan0021.jpg

 

And here's the credit agreement:

 

Page 1

scan0022.jpg

Page 2

scan0023.jpg

 

Anyone offer any advice quickly please?

 

Thanks

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Faxed LBL this morning, requesting a copy of the sealed BoS.

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Michael Just seen your post. First thing to do is hide the car. Second thing is to contact stephen solicitors in manchester xx

 

Thanks for that :) Have done 2nd thing (though I think it might be a little late in the day) :D Am not sure about 1st thing - what do I do when they turn up to collect?

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Faxed LBL this morning, requesting a copy of the sealed BoS.

 

Funnily enough, not received anything from them as yet....

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you not already in default, according to your notice?

 

I wouldn't have thought the fact that you have requested a copy of the BoS will make any difference to the default date.

 

Did you talk to them about your circumstances and inform them that you may not be able to meet the demands of the default notice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you not already in default, according to your notice?

 

Yup, though I suspect that the notice doesn't comply with the requirements of the CCA.

 

I wouldn't have thought the fact that you have requested a copy of the BoS will make any difference to the default date.

 

That's not the aim at all - the aim is to check that the sealed BoS is valid and complies with the relevant legislation, since that's the object they rely upon to gain possession of the vehicle.

 

Did you talk to them about your circumstances and inform them that you may not be able to meet the demands of the default notice?

 

Nope - I don't think that would serve any point at all, I've had the old circular conversations with LBL many times before and now avoid speaking to them on the phone. In any event, I now have solicitors on the case investigating the legalities... :D

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since posting earlier, I've opened today's post and LBL have sent the sealed copy of the BoS.....very interesting.

 

To add to my doubts over the validity in terms of the attestation & wording, the seal states that it was sealed by the Supreme Court on..... 30th August 2007, some 10 days after the BoS was made & signed - s8 Bills of Sale Act (1878) Amendment Act 1882 (c.43) states:

 

8.Every bill of sale shall be duly attested, and shall be registered under the principal Act within seven clear days after the execution thereof, or if it is executed in any place out of England then within seven clear days after the time at which it would in the ordinary course of post arrive in England if posted immediately after the execution thereof; and shall truly set forth the consideration for which it was given; otherwise such bill of sale shall be void in respect of the personal chattels comprised therein.

 

Bingo, methinks!

 

Also got the solicitor's instructions pack :D

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...