Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BCW Falsely Claiming They are Collecting for Aequs Finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5869 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A number of years ago i got dragged into signing up for a home learning college course. I started the course but didnt get on with it, by this time my cooling off period had expired and the finance company that hlc had used was Aequs Finance. Through my own fault i defaulted on the payments, but my way of thinking was if i didnt like the course, why should i have to pay for it.

I didnt hear anything for months from Aequs Finance, then all of a sudden i get a phonecall from BCW claiming that they were collecting the money on behalf of Aequs Finance. I agreed the pay them the installments that they offered, which was the same as the initial monthly fee.

Then i decided to stop paying as i really couldnt afford this with my monthly bills. By this time i had paid £490 pounds to them, nearly half the total sum.

They then send me letters as is usual, but i stumbled across what i think is unfair practices with this company. I decided to phone Aequs Finance and ask them how much i had paid. They told me that the debt had been sold to BCW and all contact should be to them.

Whenm i confronted BCW with this they told me that they had not bought the debt.

i have now requested a CCA from BCW and they have told me that they are putting the case on hold, and they do not hold CCAs (they returned my £1 postal order) they will contact their client Aequs finance to send me one, but they are falsely claiming that they are collecting on behalf of Aequs Finance.

Is this illegal? are they being fraudulent in their actions? can i claim any of my payments made to them back?

What makes me angry is the fact that these companys can sell my personal information which is confidential between me and the original creditor. How is this legal?

any help would be much appreciated.

i have prepared a strong letter telling them that i know the full situation and that they are being fraudulent in their actions, requesting a CCA from them again and reminding them of the credit acts and requesting my money in full back from them, but i have not posted yet should i post it? or just let them get away with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Welcome to CAG.

 

What makes me angry is the fact that these companys can sell my personal information which is confidential between me and the original creditor. How is this legal?

any help would be much appreciated.

 

 

Yes they can if it is in the original contact you signed, (be suprised if it wasn't). As to the rest, the moral of the story is DON'T talk to collectors on the phone, they will lie through their teeth knowing you can never prove it.

 

As it stands now the CCA request you have sent regarding this account is in default. Until this is satisfied neither they, nor anyone else for that matter can force you to pay unless they can come up with the paperwork.

 

Sit back and make them prove it>

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply david. should i send the letter that i have prepared, or should i just leave it until they reply again. As it stands they are trying to say that they are working on behalf of the finance company and they are not. therefore they sent me a letter saying that they would not be sending me a cca and sent my po for £1 back to me, so the request i made is not valid, whats to stop them doing this again?

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...