Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Turn casual moments into unforgettable dates – choose the best casual dating site! Actual Girls [URL=https://matchnow.life]Super casual Dating[/URL]
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

'ATTENTION' heading on CAG ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5911 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now I know I'm a bit of an ole trooper on here and had my fair share of moans, but can one of wiser ones please tell me why, on the top of the site there is this 'ATTENTION' notice telling people to come and 'chat' to us when firstly 'chatting' is not affiliated to CAG and secondly there is a box on the first page of that link encouraging people to go and get their credit score done for free?

 

Anyone touring the Debt Forums will scream at you NOT to get your credit scores and files from the CRA's without thinking it through very carefully as they tip off Debt Collection Agencies left right and center about your application. That in turn sets off the dca's chasing very old debt or alleged debt, enflicting grief all over the place. The only time you should ask for a credit file is if you really NEED to.

 

So, why are we encouraging this link to this website 'chat' when we have the Bear Garden for that all nice and cosy within these walls with lots of friendly people?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "Attention" bit was for the April Fools joke.

 

People bleated on about the chatroom being removed from here; as a courtesy I have allowed the link to the chatroom from another site.

 

You will notice that the link ONLY links to the chatroom and nothing else.

 

If I take it down I'll be slated, and if I leave it I'll be slated.

 

As there are no adverts here and donations have dried up almost completely since the OFT case started, I don't think it unreasonable to link to a site with adverts on it rather than to host them here.

 

The consumerhealthforums that are linked to from here also have advertisements on them.

 

As to the point about the CRAs 'tipping off' the debt collection agencies - without your consent, this would be a breach of the Data Protection Act, so I doubt that it happens that way. If it does, it's certainly not legal.

 

To state the blindingly obvious: if you don't want to go and check your credit file, then don't click on the advert - in much the same was as if you don't want to buy 'CallBurner' for Skype, then don't click the link on the left of this forum.

 

Sounds like you're a dead man whichever way you go Dave :D To be honest, I always thought the chat room to be a waste of time - there's not a whole bundle that can't be discussed on forum in the Bear Garden if anyone wanted it - I found the chat room awkward, gave people the opportunity to be stroppy and argumentative and at least on the forum there is control - even with loose cannons like me ! It may have suited some people, but I couldn't be bothered - there's plenty of support on the main forum to discuss issues and plenty of fun in the Bear Garden. As for the adverts, well I agree to a point although if someone is earning out of a link like that then... (EDIT) :D

 

Sadly Dave, I do not agree with your synopsis though. The CRA's own debt collection agencies, there is a distinct upsurge in DCA activity and letters coming to debtors once a credit report is received, you don't have to look far in the debt Forum to see that. Yes I agree, don't click if you know all this, but it's encouraging people to get their reports and there are plenty of people who do not read through the forums before whizzing off onto these links.

 

Anyway, I know you are always thinking of us all for the right reasons - Damned if you do, damned if you don't :D

 

The other thing was that the gap at the top of the forum is getting bigger everytime you put something up there, so whenever we changed threads there's a whole load more scrolling to do! - That's it - I'm off.... :D :D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of CRAs (or DCAs for that matter)!

 

In fact, I don't understand why people use them.

 

It's relatively easy to opt-out of using S12 of the Data Protection Act.

 

...now if we could only get about 20% of people to assert THAT right, then I think the CRAs (and their ridiculously unfair methods of working) would have their days numbered.

 

What in laymans terms are you suggesting here Dave? I've seen a number of references to using s.12 - what is your thought on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think the link should stay, as there have been plenty of people coming in to the chat room looking for help, and have been shown the way to the appropriate forums in here.

 

Then I will rest my case and leave them to your better judgment..if it helps just one, then that is good enough to leave it. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL - sorry, missed that bit...so, if I don't want to NOT not buy the callburner, then I don't click the link on the left, but if I do want to not NOT buy the callburner, then I do need to click the link.

 

Can you just confirm whether I have this right or not, as I only want to buy callburner if I want callburner, and not buy it if I don't want callburner...or something like that...

 

LOL...:cool:

 

Hey Spiceskull - there's a rave from the grave. Haven't seen you about for ages - if I've missed you - sorry - but hey - welcome back anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...