Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
    • I drove a friends a car for a few days and I used cuvva car insurance to insure myself for the time period. Here's the problem: I made a mistake with the dates on the insurance, I ended up driving uninsured for one day and I got a speeding ticket. My friend named me as the driver on the Notice of Intended Prosecution as she should and I will take the blame of course. Will met police ask for proof that I was in fact driving? I mean, any more other than me replying to the NIP that I will soon receive from them? Cause I assume that my insurance for the day will be the proof that they need... Secondly,  if caught driving uninsured, what will happen please? I read it's £300 and 6 points. Is that all or is it worse? I'm only asking for information from knowledgable people. If you intent to just mock, you're certainly not helping. Thanks
    • Hi, Please find letter sent to BMW with all evidence off issues which is a link from Audi. Unable to share the footage on this forum as I am not the best with tech BMW FAULTY CAR LETTER.docx
    • This is the first item that I've ever claimed for - I don't really send too many parcels, probably 5 in the last 5 years, and only two with P2G / EVRi. I've attached two emails from P2G regarding their requiring the documents. They don't specify in the emails what documents I should be sending, although when opening the claim they were requesting that I needed photographic proof of sending - picture of the parcel with their label attached, in the EVRi ParcelShop. The second email is their closing the enquiry due to my failure to produce said document(s). I haven't yet drafted my claim letter, I wanted to be sure of this document situation first before I began action. But therein lies another problem. Not having a P2G account, I cannot be sure of the item value that I declared. The retail value at the time was £600, which is less than the £650 I paid several months earlier, so I would likely have used that, but cannot be sure. And without having an account I can't check either. But, I know that I did properly declare the item and a value that reflected its then retail price - I was concerned this declaration may have been used to single the item for theft. But now that the retail price has reduced substantially, even though the nature of compensation is to return the claimant back to their original position, without my purchase receipt, I was concerned that I may have to claim for less. And yes, I've been through your huge document store of information, in addition to MoneySavingExpert, Which, Citizens Advice, Gov.uk "make a court claim", my own law books (annoyingly I specialised in consumer law when I studied for my law degree, but I graduated 17 years ago), and so now feel that its time to either act, or drop it. P2G Enquiry (2).pdf P2G Enquiry (1).pdf
    • I have found both forms online  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e14db38fa8f5649f912647/TE9.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c73ad0d3bf7f4bd6a9bc69/te7-dart-eng.pdf   do i just fill in both forms and send to the address on them or directly to Manchester council  forgive my ignorance    thanking you in advance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

can it be challenged?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5892 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if the work of neil herron and his team is succesful

 

I'm confused one minute we are told you can appeal 'its the law' then we are told Mr Herron is of the opinion we should be able to appeal, then you say he has won appeals and now you are saying IF he is succesful? Please make up your mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Using your line of thought, you are claiming we can all forget about the adjudicator pay the PCN then contest it in the County Court? In London alone that would mean at least 1000 cases a week going before County Courts that are not set up to deal with PCNs. The law is quite clear in how PCNs should be contested, they are not unfair charges like banks they are charges set out in statute. If this works for PCNs why not FPNs pay up skip magistrates Court and plead your innocence in County Court??

I'm not stopping people challenging because you have yet to explain how to challenge except for writing to the Council asking for your money back. Why would they give you your money back if they have just fined you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Using your line of thought, you are claiming we can all forget about the adjudicator pay the PCN then contest it in the County Court? In London alone that would mean at least 1000 cases a week going before County Courts that are not set up to deal with PCNs. The law is quite clear in how PCNs should be contested, they are not unfair charges like banks they are charges set out in statute. If this works for PCNs why not FPNs pay up skip magistrates Court and plead your innocence in County Court??

I'm not stopping people challenging because you have yet to explain how to challenge except for writing to the Council asking for your money back. Why would they give you your money back if they have just fined you?

 

 

 

Once you have your full list of PCNs back from the Council following your Data  Protection request and once you have established the exact date when their PCNs were changed to be fully compliant you make the request in writing and ask for a refund.

  • Some local authorities have quietly refunded PCNs simply to avoid a legal challenge which could force them to refund everyone, even those who do not make the request.
  • Some councils will ignore your letter, therefore it is essential that you send it recorded delivery.
  • Some councils have been taken to the Small Claims Court and have reached a settlement.
  • Some councils are refusing to refund ... therefore we intend to ensure that a High Court precedent is established.
  • Some councils are claiming that by paying a Penalty Charge Notice you 'accepted' the contravention and therefore you are not entitled to a refund. The legal opinion that we commissioned states that this is most certainly not the case.

 Once we have enough cases ready to proceed then we will make this legal opinion freely available.

So, in the meantime go and establish how much you have paid in Parking Penalty Charge Notices in the last 6 years in readiness for the next stage of proceedings.

direct from the web site, and i know im sticking my kneck out here,

however I make you a PERSONAL CHALLENGE email neil herron parkingappeals.co.uk or phone him on 09065 500149 and talk to him.

 

Then prove me wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is like groundhog day!!! That procedure is for restitution for non compliant pcns with one date ruled non compliant in the high court. I said that was possible at the start of this saga. What you have yet to come up with is a valid case where someone has paid a PCN then decided to appeal against the contravention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is like groundhog day!!! That procedure is for restitution for non compliant pcns with one date ruled non compliant in the high court. I said that was possible at the start of this saga. What you have yet to come up with is a valid case where someone has paid a PCN then decided to appeal against the contravention.

 

 

 

Q. Are there any other reasons why a Penalty Charge Notice should be refunded?

A. Yes. Many local authorities have had missing or incorrect Traffic Regulation Orders ( the legal documents that detail the parking restriction). If that is the case then there can be no charge as no Traffic Order has been contravened. Many Councils have kept such matters quiet ... and kept the money. Our investigations and then exposure through the press and media have ensured that motorists fined in such circumstances have received refunds. We have whistleblowers within councils who are now sending us evidence of such cover-ups and we will report and detail them in full.

Other instances include Parking Attendants dismissed for falsifying documents, signing errors and other documentary errors. As we build up the evidence on each local authority then we will assist with new set of recovery letters.

So, meanwhile if you suspect that there may be errors in signing or that your council may have been less than honest in the way they have been operating their Decriminalised Parking Enforcement regime then you can submit a Freedom of Information Request asking for information.

A few samples are listed below:

Incorrect or Missing Traffic Orders

Incorrect or Missing Signs

Successful appeals to the adjudicators

 

 

and so the argument rages......

 

 

I will keep this up for as long as it takes,

 

sorry green I will not let this drop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

sorry green I will not let this drop.

 

I have nothing to gain or lose so I am not bothered what you do unlike Mr Herron who is claims to get you off anything as long as you part with some cash. As for your advice to ring him I think at £1 a min from a BT line I will give it a miss, lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I helped a woman challange a pcn and NPAS threw it out before the appeal the council did not even have a say in it

thanks neil herron

 

If thats true it's illegal, NPAS have no power to cancel a PCN before appeal and without hearing from the Council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have nothing to gain or lose so I am not bothered what you do unlike Mr Herron who is claims to get you off anything as long as you part with some cash. As for your advice to ring him I think at £1 a min from a BT line I will give it a miss, lol.

 

 

 

email then it will cost you f### all

 

you little twirp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...