Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

foaf26907 vs CL Finance


foaf26907
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help :sad:

I have outstanding debt with CL Finance via a Debenhams Card I had which I fell behind on when I was made redundant about 4 years ago.

They went to court and I agreed a repayment plan with them but unfortuantely couldn't keep up with the repayments and fell behind they have gone back to court and I have to now file an N55/N56 attachmenet of earnings. I intend to file and ask for a suspended order so that I can try and get the judgement overturned(?) on the basis that I didn't have a CCA with them (?)

I will be sending the N56 to court tomorrow but want to find out if it is at all possible to get the CCJ overturned when I didn't do anything when they first started preceedings.

I have seen a thread v CL Finance for which I am kicking myslef for not bothering to check CAG in the first place but now I am sending a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to CL Finance I've got 2 other debts they are managing as well. I haven't defaulted with these yet but what can be done once they have gone to court and court found in thier favour and have ordered me to pay.

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello Can some one please give me some advice here :-(

I have posted this is debt collection but this seems to fit in more with the general debt .......

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you acknowledge the claim form or was it a judgement by default? If you have been to court and agreed a repayment there will be little you can do to overturn that decision - i am no expert but if you have already admitted it in court what grounds can you get it overturned?

 

Good luck with them :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I will be totally honest and say that without carrying out some research on this i cant say what youre chances are of getting the CCJ overturned.

 

normally people would challenge this type of action before it gets to teh attachment of earnings.

 

CCJs are quite difficult to have set aside and you would need to have a stronger arguement than you want it overturned because you didnt challenge it

 

 

i will have a look into this and see what i can come up with but my gut feeling is you may have left it too late

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello thank you for responding. the judgement was made by default I did not acknowledge the claim form. If I have to continue payments I will but I want to avoid an attachment of earnings.

I would like to know as I have 2 debts with them which I am paying. I have sent them a SAR for the debts with them. But as I am already paying them is it too late to query the other 2 debts

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

This case went to court I did not attend and then I had to agree a repaymet with them.

The other 2 were the same they have been to court and judgement was found for them so court ordered me to pay.

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there anyone who can offer me some help

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,

 

why didnt you defend the claim or acknowledge the claim? as i said , the court will not overturn a judgment based merely on the fact that you didnt defend the claim.you need a truly valid reason before a judge will consider overturning a judgment

 

have a look at this website,Removal of CCJ's - Main Menu

 

it may help

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanbks very helpful. so is there no point querying/requesting for DCA now? even for the other two accounts ? am I just going to have to keep paying

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got my credit file online from Experian and it is only this 1 account from CL finance which is showing as defaulted.

None of the others are there. What does this mean. I know some of the debts are old ones which I have been paying since 2005 when I was made redundant but how come they are no longer showing on my credit file? Also another debt from 1st credit which I have a repayment plan can I ask them for the DCA?

Thanks

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

well certainly do not go chasing for answers as to why the defaults are not showing:D I am a little confused by this thread, PT is right you cannot set aside the judgment as you have agreed and paid toward it, your best bet is to bring it up to date as quickly as possible

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...