Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Reclaiming PPI from Halifax (Loan)


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've used this site in the past (for charges reclaim) and I am now back with my PPI problem!

 

Basically, took out a loan with the Halifax in 2005 and included PPI. Didn't realise at the time that I didn't need it, the guy on the phone made it sound like it was vital to get my loan authorised, I wasn't told that it was optional, didn't know I could get it for £6 per month elsewhere blah blah blah.

 

When I found all this out, and realised that it was an extra £1700+ on top of my loan amount and interest which is nearly £50 a month I called the Halifax and asked for it to be removed from the loan. They told me the only way to do this would be to refinance - which would incur more interest etc. I'm now paying back the capital sum so there's no way I'm doing that!

 

Wrote to the Halifax telling them I was mis-sold for reasons above (and others found on another money advice website). They told me they're allowed 8 weeks to reply...I'm not impatient so I waited...10 weeks. Just for them to tell me there's no complaint to answer. They did not answer all of my points re; mis-selling and more importantly the fact that it's £44 more expensive per month than their closest competitor.

 

Now I have to go to the FOS if I want to take my complaint further.

 

Is this all sounding about right to you, or am I missing some vital steps?

 

Thanks in advance for your assistance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds fairly normal - have a good read of the material in the stickies. You can take the FOS route if you wish - but you may also want to consider the court route.

 

You can claim 8% on the £1700, and each interest payment, from the date the amounts were applied until the date of payment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...