Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowells - Have they finally gone too far? **WON**


removalman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

This is my first posting and for the last few months I've been watching with keen interest the numerous postings on this great site about Lowells.

Based upon some of the things I've been reading, I have every reason to believe that they have have now just gone one step too far in their dealings with me and I'm looking for some guidance as to the best course of action open to me.

 

First of all some brief background...

 

I started being harrassed by the Lowells, Hamptons, Red threatograms about a year ago over a disputed Barclaycard debt. The debt has been consistently denied as its not owed. The letters from these people get increasingly aggressive to the point where they seem to be just about to take legal action but then of course they don't (because they can't prove the debt). Then the merry-go-round just starts up all over again. For the record, my financial position is such that if I honestly thought I owed Barclaycard (or their alleged assignees) the money I would pay it immediately. I would be happier spending the money (if I had to) on lawyers.

 

That's the background done, now to the present state of play...

 

On 15th October I wrote (enclosing my PO for £1.00) requesting a copy of the CCA. Got the typical reply a day later about "endeavouring" to do so within 12 days etc. Suffice to say, its now five weeks later I've not heard any further from them.

 

However, last week a firm of solicitors called MacKenzie Hall phoned me about the debt (which was a tad surprising given that I was under the impression that until they produced the CCA they couldn't take any further action). Anyway the debt was duly denied and in yesterdays post came a letter from Mackenzie Hall requesting payment or court action blah blah blah.

 

So now what do I do?

 

I've seen suggestions on some threads here that Lowells may actually be committing a criminal offence? If that's true, then I would love to go to the police and make a complaint - but on what grounds? I would want to make sure that I had it exactly right as to the offence they may be guilty of as it would be great for these people to be on the receiving end of some harrassment for a change.

 

What other avenues are open to me?

 

I've seen some very mixed messages on here about the relative effectiveness/knowledge of Trading Standards - so would that be a waste of time?

 

Should I approach the OFT or the FSA? They're also presumably in breach of some Data Protection regulations if they've passed my details onto MacKenzie Hall.

 

Or perhaps in the first instance I should write direct to Lowells to make them aware of what I may do and give them seven days to end this harrassment once and for all. Perhaps I ought to make sure that MacKenzie Hall are made aware that as they are a party to any alleged breaches that they are potentially in the firing line too?

 

Would welcome advice, guidlines, opinions etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to EVERYONE for your replies this morning, its been most helpful.

I've decided to send the appropriate letter to Mackenzie Hall but I'm going to wait another week or so before I write to Lowells as I want to wait the full 30 + 12 days which is not quite there yet.

Is that a sensible course?

I'm still intrigued by the prospect of them being potentially guilty of a criminal offence - has anyone got any experience of making this stick and involving the Police or is it just theory thats never been tested?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again to everyone. I thought it was an idea to give you an update:

I wrote to Mackenzie Hall in line with the template suggested in this forum and they replied within two days confirming that I will not hear from them again. Hurrah!! So one down, just one to go - Lowells!

These people can be beaten. :p But I couldn't have done it without the superb knowledge available from everyone on this site. So thank you!

All said and done, it does have a slightly hollow victory as the debt was never owed in the first place but right this minute there is a sense of relief that the harrassment is coming to an end.

Regards,

Tony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Job done!

Went through the Lowells complaints procedure (a waste of two weeks) but have today got a letter from them confirming their files are now closed!

This wouldn't have happened without the knowledge and support of the the clever people on this site - so many thanks to one and all - and seasons greetings to you all.

Lowells can be beaten - and thats the best Xmas pressie of all!

Cheers!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to you all for your kind words!

I'm feeling very smug (which is great) but I'm also mindful that I allowed Lowells to cause me one or two sleepless nights along the way.

What a find this website forum this is!

Merry Xmas all!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...