Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Holiday Pay and Pay in Lieu of notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

My son recently was dismissed from his job for bad timekeeping and absenteeism.

 

Am I correct in saying that as this dismissal is not for gross misconduct but the lesser reason of misconduct then he is entitled to pay in lieu of notice, he has 3 completed years of service?

His contract says: "The Employer may terminate this Agreement without notice or pay in lieu of notice in the case of serious or persistent misconduct such as to a major breach of the Employer's disciplinary rules."

 

With regards to his holiday pay the contract says: " The employee will not be entitled to be paid in respect of holidays accrued due to be taken as at the date of termination of employment."

 

After following the disciplinary procedures he was dismissed on the spot and at the time of his dismissal had only taken a few days of his holiday entitlement.

 

I would appreciate some information.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Trevor :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trevor,

 

Your son will be entitled to his holiday pay only if he was dismissed and not sumararilly dismissed, this will also mean he will be paid notice as per his contract. If he has been sumararilly dismissed then I'm affraid he will only get paid up to the time of his dismissal. His letter of dismissal will state whether or not he was dismissed or sumararily dismissed, I wouldn't assist the company though by asking the question. If the letter is silent just submit a letter asking for his notice and holiday pay.

 

Legislation has replaced the clause in his contract by default the part that says he is not entitled to holiday pay at termination of employment.

 

You say that your son was dismissed on the spot after (the company?) followed the disciplinary procedures. Was their a full investigation, was the disciplinary held by someone other than the person who investigated the matter (and someone more senior), was he given the right to be accompanied by either a Trade Union Representative or a work colleague, was he given copies of all the evidence well in advance of the disciplinary to enable him to prepare his defence and has he been notified in writing the outcome and his right of appeal?

 

If not he will potentially have grounds to go to tribunal but would have to appeal first to exhaust the internal procedures.

 

I hope this is useful?

 

Best regards,

 

Paul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Paul,

 

Thanks for your reply it was what I was thinking.

 

The actual words used in his dismissal letter are "The charge of misconduct is therefore upheld and we have no alternative but to dismiss you with immediate effect. "

 

I believe this is a dismissal and not a summarily dismissed and therefore entitled to both holiday pay and pay in lieu of notice.

 

Thank you again.

 

Trevor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trevor,

 

I believe he is too from what you have quoted in the letter.

 

He will need to appeal against the decision and write requesting his outstanding payments.

 

The reason he needs to appeal are to protect his position because he might not be able to go to tribunal to claim the pay he is owed if he has not gone through the appeal process first.

 

Good luck!

 

Regards,

 

Paul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dismissal with immediate effect means just that, unfortunately. It is a summary dismissal without notice. This would particularly appear to be so if they have not written to him about any notice pay or notice period and his employment terminated as stated, with immediate effect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Trevor,

 

further to my posts yesterday, after appealing your son would need to raise a formal grievance against the company over his claim for holiday and notice pay.

 

This would have to be done before the tribunal would accept any claim for either unfair dismissal or for monies owed.

 

Best regards,

 

Paul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...