compact law link: Yes this applies to the court's maladministration of justice

Good idea this!

There was no chance i could have turned up to the hearing as 1) the court told me that had no record of a hearing in my name at that date and time and 2) i am from Derby and the fabled hearing (or as you put it, Eons room hire) was in Portsmouth. Any legitimate court hearing HAS to transfer the proceedings to a court close to the defendant. I still dont understand this term 'human rights letter,' as human rights act only applies to government bodies and not individual companies, if this fabled Human rights letter is in conjunction with the human rights act, then Eon have no place with it. Eon have still to provide any response asking them for any information appears to be landing on deaf ears. Seems like they have no answer (legal answer) to any of my requests which leads me to believe that they have PLENTY to hide about the whole affair. Before a legitimate court hearing you are entitled to all information regarding the case. But once one has concluded (albeit fraudulently or legitimately) then I believe they can charge a small fee for copies of any information. Either way, the smell is very strong about the whole issue. Definite wrong doing by both the courts and Eon, manipulating and forging summons', hearings, evidence and warrants for both their benefits and with no liberty and rights enforced to the public consumer. There has been a breach to the right to a fair trial. Thing is, who can I complain to now? The ombudsman Ofgem have NO legal authority at all! Who do i complain to about the dodgy court and judge?

As far as I am aware the right of entry act does not specify that they have to give notice or not? It does specify though that if they obtain a warrant that they must send you a copy before enforcing it? Also, as it is known as a hearing (and not simply an application), then any hearing cannot be ruled without notice. Yes I have read so much about council tax liability sessions also, the same things apply there regarding fraudulent court summons and hearings.

Well i have asked both the court and Eon similar questions regarding the supposed hearing and warrant. The court have responded stating that in order for them to send me a copy of the warrant I have to pay £10? The court is yet to respond when I have asked them which judge presided over the hearing? They have stated that there is no method of appealing the warrant, and only Eon has the power to cancel the warrant. They have not responded to my question of what evidence they had to consider at the supposed hearing. since when was Eon a higher authority than the justice system and their appeals procedure? The court still has an obligation to forward a copy of any order or warrant it makes onto the defendant. Eon, are yet to respond to any requests for information regarding the hearing?

Correct, but there still needs to be an official hearing for any case in a court, and the court is obliged to invite you to that hearing. There is no legislation in place which allows any third party (be it a utility company or even the local council) the legal right to issue summons to hearings.

I fear you are both correct but we have to do something one day or else everyone will keep getting treated incorrectly. What I have done is reported breaking and entering on my property by Eon, so at least the police will have to investigate the validity of the warrant now. The trouble is complaining about the courts and judges actions, thats only ever going to fail i think, but i shall try regardless. Bear in mind I have still not ever seen any said warrant, despite several requests, and in order to appeal a warrant, you require a claim number. AS there has not been any legal hearing, there is NO claim number, so you cant legally challenge the warrant.

I have been in dispute with Eon for some time now regarding my bills. My emails fall on deaf ears as Eon have responded stating that they will no longer discuss my dispute. As this thread depicts on many occasions, the inevitable Warrant of Entry was applied for by Eon in Portsmouth Court. I am from Derby. Now, as a Justice of the Peace, I am sure you are aware of the Magistrate Court Act 1980 (and in turn the Civil Procedure Rules 1998/9). These are legislation set in place guaranteeing the rights of citizens in regards to court processes. One major flaw in the letters all these bloggers receive is that these invites to courts are NOT actually from the court themselves, but from the Utility Companies. The Magistrates Courts Act is clear on the fact that only a Court can summon a person to a hearing, not a company and therefore the utility company's letters are NOT summons'. Therefore, without the court actually summoning you to court personally, there can be NO court hearing?! When I had the 'Human Rights Letter,' a term of which I had never seen written in law before, I immediately wrote to the said court to ask if they had my name down for a hearing on that date at that time. The response I had was negative. Hence, there never was any official hearing. Now in order for any warrant to be issued, the more recent (1980) Magistrates Courts Act, (which therefore has precedence over the outdated Right of Entry act (1954), is clear that there has had to have been a hearing, to which the court has an obligation set in law to invite you to in order to give you the opportunity to defend yourself (i.e have a fair trial, a cornerstone of British law first mentioned in the Magna Carter!). Therefore, if the court itself hasn't actually summoned you to court for a hearing then there is no official hearing. Secondly, even if there was a hearing, the court is obliged to inform the defendant (us) that the claimant/creditor (Utility company) has been successful in their claim. All correspondence from the Utility companies are not official court documentation and thus are fraudulent when impersonating the courts. When a warrant is issued the courts, again, have to notify you of the warrant, and this could only ever be issued following a court appearance at a hearing which we potentially were unsuccessful at. I have never been invited, by a court, to any such hearing and thus any warrant of entry made against me by a court is in dereliction of duty, i.e. the court / judge has not followed the correct, legal court process in which it is legal to issue such warrants. Furthermore, if we leave the Magistrates act aside and concentrate on the Rights of Entry act, in combination with the Electricity act 1989, 'if there is ever any genuine dispute between the consumer and the utility company, a warrant of entry CANNOT be issued. I wrote to the court regardless of their lack of protocol stating clearly that a warrant cant be issued for my property as there is an ongoing genuine dispute. At the supposed hearing that Eon (not the court) invited me to, the judge has an obligation, by law, to scrutinise and consider all evidence set before them in order to be completely clear that there decision on issuing any judgement (or in this case, warrant)(Magistrates act again). In these 'rubber stamping' situations it is almost guaranteed that the judge seeing the applications can never be beyond any doubt that they have considered all aspects of the case in order to issue their verdict. Especially when the courts haven't even summoned the defendant to the supposed hearing to put over their case. In short, all Warrants issued under this old Right of Entry Act are issued illegally, as the Magistrates Courts Act, which protects us to a more fair trial, takes precedence over the 1954 act and has been disregarded. Now I conducted all correct enquiries to the courts to make certain that there was no hearing, and they agreed there was no hearing. Yet still Eon turned up one day and broke in claiming they had a warrant of entry?!?!?! I threw them out and now face conviction through two counts of battery that the Eon staff alleged I inflicted upon them. I was defending my home from the elitist Big Six companies, by following the letter of the law, and still face conviction. These warrants are all illegal and it is about time these courts/judges are convicted themselves of fraudulent activity and of dereliction of duty, as well as the perjury crimes of the utility companies by providing misleading information to the magistrates.