Hello sorry DB but I think you are wrong in this aspect, MM pointed out something I have been thinking for a long time, I never knew about any other sites until I came on here and it wasn't long before I was browsing that I found what is considered by certain members on CAG to be a dangerous and possibly costly site to visit in respect that the wrong legal interpretation and advice is used. Now going by the above I stated "site to visit in respect that the wrong legal interpretation and advice is is used" and having visited the non mentionable site I can see two different versions of law, which is correct I have only a basic