Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cold calling RAC scam - be aware of this!


MrShed
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4539 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, just thought might be a good idea to give a heads up about this.

 

Over the last couple of days, I have received a couple of calls from a number 08700 500 524. Usually when I have answered, the phone has just gone dead, but someone spoke yesterday. A Scottish guy, claiming to be from the RAC, trying to sell me some "personal accident cover" for a special offer of £15. I let him do his shpeal, and proceeded to challenge him by informing him that I do not ever give out personal information for payment or anything else on a cold call. He said that "I do not need to give any personal information, just confirm the direct debit details that are already on file". Well, this came as something as a surprise to me, as I have no direct debit with RAC, and never have done. I informed him of this, and basically, to cut a long story short, I challenged him on a few more points, and he got off the phone very quickly.

 

More to confirm that I had no direct debit than anything, I then proceeded to ring RAC "back" on their customer care number. They were very helpful, she checked all of the records for me and then informed me that absolutely for certain no-one from RAC had rang me that day. She also informed me that if RAC ever rang me, they would never ask for any form of personal details, including but not limited to bank details and debit card details. They seemed very concerned, and have apparently escalated it to a department to look into the possible fraud being carried out by some third party.

 

So the moral of the story I guess is to never give out personal info to an incoming caller!

 

As a point of note, may be worth saying what my "good practice" is with cold callers. IF I am ever interested in what they are selling(which is very rare), I simply ask for their name and/or EXTENSION number, then hang up. I proceed to look up the name of the company on a legitimate source, ring the company, and ask for the person. This prevents people claiming to be from a company they are not.

 

Hope this helps some people!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only slightly relevant - I received a similar call from the RAC but it turned out to be Aviva (Norwich Union) who were flogging Insurances to RAC members. Like you, I don't buy anything from cold sales callers (door or phone), but rogue call centre staff aside - it is a worrying trend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there should be some kind of legal requirement that if you are only ringing on behalf of the company, but not the company itself, you should have to declare this. If I speak to someone on the phone I want to know the name of the company that employs THEM, not the company who have subcontracted them!

 

 

Grrrr hate cold callers :p

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still at least there is a number presented. When CLI came in and OFTEL allowed these firms to make calls anonymously, I was appalled - I said it was open to abuse and complained the reason for exclusion on 'technical' terms untenavle. But, the loophole was there and 10+ yeas of untraceable calls resulted. At least numbers MUST be shown, but a pity the bulk of them show 'fake' (Presentation) numbers, rather than the real number used to call you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still at least there is a number presented. When CLI came in and OFTEL allowed these firms to make calls anonymously, I was appalled - I said it was open to abuse and complained the reason for exclusion on 'technical' terms untenavle. But, the loophole was there and 10+ yeas of untraceable calls resulted. At least numbers MUST be shown, but a pity the bulk of them show 'fake' (Presentation) numbers, rather than the real number used to call you.

 

A call centre may have a thousand trunks across a DDI range, used for outbound calling. Other trunks will be designated for inbound calling. It is just not viable to present a CLI for each trunk, so a single CLI is presented for CallerID and 1471. This will be a generic number that will allow you to leave a message (or give you an inbound DDI number to call) to have your phone number removed from the dialler.

 

Also, it is perfectly normal for the call centre to be running other campaigns across the same outbound trunks. Each campaign will present its own single CLI - this is generated in the dialler.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This wasn't the issue - I fully understand how out/in trunks are handled by switching systems and the later VOIP connectivity. The problem was OFTEL permitterd the absence of number information because the originating equipment could not provide the data. This may have been the case, but until last year firms with the latest kit and fully capable of showing numbers did not do so because of the loophole.

 

This issue has largely gone because of the change that demands firms present a number, but now with overseas calling centres, OFCOM cannot mandate for inbound international calls, and despite the international C7 connection supporting CLU, these (usually) indian call centres have turned their number presentation off....

 

It makes you wonder.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

you should have a look at leakingwindscreen.com to see how RAC operate......

Long time ago in a galaxy FAR FAR AWAY, there lived an elf who shot banks for a living.........

Now through the power of the internet there is the CONSUMER ACTION GROUP,

 

Watch out they are getting crafty those pesky CRITTERS!

 

Banks will tell you their charges are transparent!

So is the invisible man but that does not mean he is fair or lawful.

 

DONT GIVE UP! FOLLOW THE CAG ADVICE AND RECLAIM YOUR CHARGES.

CAPITAL BANK! YOU ARE NEXT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...