Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it be either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Car exchange and lost money


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

As I see it from your account, the purchase of the original car was cancelled by mutual agreement so the deposit you paid should then be transfered to the repacement car. As that was £1k dearer than the original car, your finance amount should now be £3995. Clearly they have simply taken the original car as p/x on the replacement thus acheiving 2 sales rather than exchanging the 'faulty' car for the 'new' one.

 

You have 2 choices in my opinion, you can contact the finance co direct and explain the situ to them and that you regard the agreement as being breached by the dealer's actions and as such you will be seeking for a full refund of your deposit (obviously if you choose this option you will need to return the car to the dealer), or you tell the dealer that unless he adjusts the transaction to reflect the fact that your finance is £3995, you will seek to terminate the deal altogether as you consider the agreement to be in dispute under the SOGA.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

While understand yor concerns, I don't think the dealer has acted in your best interests. Finance isn't my strongest field but but it dosn't seem fair that your deposit has simply been consumed from a situation which started with the original car being of unsatisfactory quality. IMHO what should of happened is that the original sale should of been cancelled completely and then you should of been back to square one as it were. It seems to me that the dealer has pulled a bit of a fast one by treating your return as a simple part exchange against the replacement car so the looser is you. When in fact the dealer should of been as he sold you a car which was faulty. Under the SOGA the seller should be given the opportunity to inspect and rectify and if that fails, then you have the option of rejecting the car for a full refund (within a reasonable time frame). It seems that the dealer has 'leap frogged' that process by simply agreeing for you to return the car and exchange it for another one. the problem is, he has treated it as another purchace and excepted the faulty car as a trade in.

 

I think you should have a word with Trading Standards about this and get face to face advice. I am also hoping others may come in with financial experience who may be able to help further.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as you have got Trading Standards on your side, I doubt that the finance co will want to persue any default action. As I see it, the dealer is in breach and has given you the right to walk away from the deal. Obviously you need to reject the car as you believe it has been mis-sold to you (check with TS for a reason to reject) and will need to put that in writing. At that point you MUST NOT use the car again. You can if you wish, hand it back complete with all docs and let TS do their work. Either they will commence an action agianst the dealer in respect of your deposit or you may have to yourself. Hopefully (it seems) TS will do it for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This just confirms what I have been saying. the dealership have treated the 'exchange' as a separate sale rather than a replacement. Also, the response from their head office seems to be avoiding the issue (deliberately in my opinion.) Trading Standards however seem to be taking the same line as me, that you should not suffer financially because the original car was faulty. If you were cynical, you could be forgiven to suspect that the dealer didn't want to give you the opportunity to reject the first car because they knew that if you did, then they would of had to refund your deposit in full and start again. I think that they have deliberately miss-lead you into thinking that they were exchanging the faulty car for a replacement when in fact they have treated it as a simple part exchange. My feeling is that Trading Standards should back you into taking legal action if necessary because I think you have been, dare I use the word; Deceived into loosing your deposit legitimately. Personally I would be tempted to take the car back (as mentioned in post #6) and say they can keep it until either they change their position and refund/adjust you deposit accordingly, or see what the outcome of possible legal action will bring. If you do this, you must advise the finance co stating that as far as you are concerned the agreement is in dispute which will mean that no default action can really be taken until it is resolved.

 

I would however, follow the advice of Trading Standards or, if necessary that of a specialist solicitor. My advice may make complete sense but I wouldn't want you to risk anything which would compromise your financial position. You could however, put these suggestions/thoughts to Trading Standards which may prompt them looking into this which they may not of thought of. we also have a Vauxhall Customer Relations cagger on here named VX Max. Hopefully he will pick up on this. It would be very interesting to here what he has to say.

 

EDIT: I have actually taken the liberty of sending VX_MAX a PM drawing his attention to this thread.

Edited by sailor sam
  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This confirms what I said in post #4. Rather than treating the situation as exchanging a fulty car for another, the dealer has made it into 2 seperatae sales. They have simply ignored the correct route which would of been you rejecting the first car under the SOGA as being not of satisfactory quality, and then refunding all your monies paid which would effectively put you back to square 1.

 

The dealer has simply manipulated the situation so they are not out of pocket but you are. Very unethical and unfair practice when they sold you a faulty car in the first place IMHO. From your original account, they seem to have encouraged you down this route also.

 

Trading Standards should really get their teeth into this for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind words which I really appreciate, thank you.

 

I would be very tempted to get further advice before making the first payment either by pusing further at TS or consulting a specialist solicitor. It may also be useful to get some opinions on the 'legal' side of returning the car from our finance guru's who normally stay on the 'banks & credit' forum. I'll se if we can attract them here by asking the site team for some guidence.

 

We must focus on the fact however, that it is the dealer who has manipulated this situation. The finace co are simply acting on their information. So it may be useful to register an official complaint to them by completing their forms and sending them back to them. But please photo copy the forms AFTER you have completed them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...