Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You're right of course, just jarring when an actual man child is knocking on my door so close to the end. Anyway, I'll keep this thread updated if ever any exciting does actually happen. Thanks again.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Black Horse Agreement. What is the APR???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I recently traded my old car in for another car and the difference was made up by a hire purchase agreement with Black Horse. I bought the car from my local Arnold Clark (which I bought my old car also). I bought it from a lad that I actually know. He told me the APR was going to be about 12% which I was happy and then told me I would be making 15 payments of £128.69 which I washappy with. I signed the paperwork and then picked up my car a few days later. I have been paying £128.69 since March this year which I have no problem paying. I was sorting out my paperwork last night and found my copy of the agreement and noticed that the APR states its at 40.5%. This wasn't what I agreed to. Also there is a lump sum payment of £426.69 to pay at the end of the hire purchase period.

I know I should have checked the paperwork fully but the guy is supposed to be a friend so I didnt think I would be getting fiddled on it. Is there anything I can do or should I just carry on with it? It isnt going to kill me paying everything they want I just feel a bit cheated as it wasnt what I agreed to :confused:

 

This is my copy of the agreement:

 

bhpg1.gif

bhpg2.gif

bhpg3.gif

Any help would be great :)

 

P.S. If the images are too big I will edit and add links to the agreement

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've done a quick calculation and if you don't take into account the final payment you have been charged just under 12% interest, that is the flat rate, NOT the APR. (If you include the final payment your flat rate is just over 15% per annum)

 

So, when your friend told you it would be about 12% he was correct in one sense, that is the interest rate you have been charged, but it is not the APR.

 

Most garages quote a flat rate as it is easier to work out the payments, the APR (the true cost of borrowing which includes all charges, ie agreement fees, arrangement fees, final payments, document fees, etc) is always shown on the actual finance agreement, and since you have signed to say you accept it I don't really see what you can do about it now.

 

It would be your word against his, he would more than likely say he quoted and advised you of the flat rate, you would argue it was the APR, but if it went to Court they would have the agreement signed by you which clearly states the APR.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted to play the 'hurt friend' and tell him you feel cheated, you trusted him to look after you and took him at his word that it would be 12% APR, now you realise it's actually over 40% you feel cheated because that is extortionate for a loan.

 

See what he says to that

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could try that. No doubt he would shrug his shoulders and say he thought he told me.

 

Never mind its my stupid fault for signing it without reading it fully. It wont happen again and I wont be getting a car from him in the future.

 

thanks for all your help Mossycat :)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...