Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oh that is very helpful, thanks a million for answering my query. Looking at the license right now. At the front it says the issue date is 2022 (that's when I swapped it), but at the back it says 2015 next to Category B. So, I'm definately at 12 points, right?  
    • The two PDF documents that you posted earlier are unavailable. I don't know why but maybe they are corrupt. I have deleted them Please will you post up again. Also please can you post multiple PDF documents in a single file multipage format, correct order right way round et cetera. Thank you  
    • The New Drivers Act sees a driver's licence revoked if he accrues six points within two years of becoming a qualified driver. If you passed your test in an EU country, then that is the date you became a "qualified driver" for the purposes of that Act.  For drivers who became qualified more than two years previously, if they accrue twelve or more points within a three year period they face a mandatory six month disqualification unless they can persuade the court that they or others will face "exceptional hardship" if they are banned.  In both cases, the dates of the offences are used to calculate the relevant period.
    • I got my car driving license in 2015 from an EU country, then I moved in the UK and swapped it to a UK license 20 months ago. What does this mean for my points limit please? Is it 6 or 12 for me right now?  
    • Interesting polling on what voters who previously voted Tory are thinking. Conservative Defector Poll June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bus and parking ticket.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys I have a complicated situation but will try and explain to the best of my ability.

 

Firstly my car was being used by my ex fianceé, I wrote to the local council several times but they refused and wanted me to pay, somewhere along the way there was a postal strike and the fees went up from £60 to £120. I payed them £60 but they wanted another £60 so I wrote them a letter saying that they should contact the person that was driving and collect the rest. I gave them details and that was that as far as I was concerned. This was in 2007. It went to north hampton and they sent me some papers that i sent to the council which were ment to go to the court or were wrong. I looked over them and filled it out and sent them off. I didnt hear anything about that. Also there was only 2 tires in the bus lane I think she may have been avoiding something on the otherside or something, i'm not in contact with her anymore and she now lives in dubai.

 

The second thing was I recieved a ticket for parking in a residents bay, now the first 3 bays are shared and the fourth and fith bays were residents only. I've only ever parked in the first 3 bays for at least a couple of years and never had a look at the rest I always thought the whole street was pay and display and the bays were seperated by allyways and drive ways, I thought that was why they were seperated. I paid for parking and got a ticket. this was early - sept 2008.

 

I apealed this thinking that the warden didnt see my permit as it was stuck on the passenger side and thought nothing of it.

 

I moved out of my parents house later that month mid - sept 2008 and moved to a location that I could go to university easily.

 

Now I thought that was the end of that.

 

On the 1st of Jan 09 my parents moved to a smaller house, as I was no longer there and my sister was married and my brother has his own place. A 4 bedroom house is a bit much for a retired couple.

 

I was over at my parents house as my mother is getting to a bad state, she is disabled and her diabetes is strating to affect her eyes now, so i've come over to help.

 

Now from my parents old house all mail is forwarded to my parents new house.

 

I've got no control nor do I know how they done it. I think they left it to the new tenents to foward the mail and not through the post office.

 

Now I was at my parents house two disabled people, myself and my sister and her 1 1/2 baby, got rudely woken up at 6 am and this bailiff is telling me he is taking my car for non payemnt and gave me 2 days to come up with nearly £700. And that was that then he rang the doorbell again and wanted to take the car.

 

I told him i'll try but before that my father told him I wasnt there as I got there late at night and my parents were asleep so they didnt know I was there. I spend a few days a week there now to make sure my parents are ok.

 

The baillif gave a seizure notice to him, my father does not speak english properly.

 

Points to take into concideration (I know I cant spell)

 

That car is used to take my mum around and has been registered to do so, but is not from mobility it is my own car.

 

Whatever work I get I need my car to go to my clients (I'm a mobile technical support agent) and have clients all over London. (This is a very varied job as sometimes I have lots of business and other time I have none).

 

What rights does he have to take my car from my parents house?

 

I'm guessing as I have nothing registered to that address and do not live there he called at my old house and they gave the foward address to him.

 

I'm very close to claiming benifits but due to pride I'm refusing and trying to get my business off the groung with regular business but my savings are running very low now I can barely buy my weekly petrol and shopping.

 

Now I'm being told by the council and the bailif that the only way I can pay in installments is by claiming benifit (which I really dont want to do). Do I have any other choice?

 

Anyway back to the point I've since found out that they sent me a refusal to my appeal and that it went to court and all letters were sent to my parents old address and was not forwarded to their new address.

 

Now we are in Mid - July 09, shouldnt they have got back to me earlier if there was a problem about my appeals?

 

I've managed to get a few extra days from the baillif and after the weekend I wish to contend the court hearing on the grounds of not recieving responce from the council of rejection of appeal and for the court to set aside the verdict and run the case again from the start before all the extra £500 in charges.

 

Thanks in advance guys this is quite an urgent matter.

Edited by playerone
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a system. By telling them to talk to the driver, who isn't liable, you have basically not paid the ticket. They can then pursue the registered keeper and take the car. Problem is the council have done nothing wrong and it's your fault for not paying, not checking your mail and thinking it would go away. Sorry, but that's the reality.

 

You're lucky they are willing to take installments. Claiming benefits is nothing to do with pride - you're entitled to them and have paid for them already by paying National Insurance.

 

Gte claiming and sort out paying by installments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only for decrim. 1984 tickets different - though admittedly relatively rare nowadays.

 

True, but an ECN under RTRA 1984 is a fixed sum - it can't be doubled.

 

And AFAIK, any Court would be a Magistrates' Court - Northampton would not be involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a system. By telling them to talk to the driver, who isn't liable, you have basically not paid the ticket. They can then pursue the registered keeper and take the car. Problem is the council have done nothing wrong and it's your fault for not paying, not checking your mail and thinking it would go away. Sorry, but that's the reality.

 

You're lucky they are willing to take installments. Claiming benefits is nothing to do with pride - you're entitled to them and have paid for them already by paying National Insurance.

 

Gte claiming and sort out paying by installments.

 

And they expect me to know this how? They could have at least let me know. If they said that then I would have paid there and then.

 

True, but an ECN under RTRA 1984 is a fixed sum - it can't be doubled.

 

And AFAIK, any Court would be a Magistrates' Court - Northampton would not be involved.

 

What does that mean?

 

The fact that I use the car for work and transportation of a disabled person they can still take the car?

 

I'm going to fill a PE3 form to take the matter back to the courts, I'm sure they'll appricate my circumstances, and borrow money to pay them off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they expect me to know this how? They could have at least let me know. If they said that then I would have paid there and then.

 

At the point it went from £60 to £120, you would have received a Notice to Owner which makes it very clear that you, the RK, are liable; long before it went to Northampton.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The baillif tried to force entry into my parents home, Is he able to do that? he has never been granted access to the house before, and gave a notice of seizure for a car which was not signed by anyone. Also I have told him several times that i am taking it back to the council through the court system and filled out statutory out of time declaration which was accepted this morning. (through the phone and by post). Even tho he still decided to come to the house and bully my parents.

 

I am complaining to the company and to the body of which his firm works for.

 

Is there anything else I can do against him?

 

He has also giving me 24 hours to pay him, even though that i preseume is illegal as the case had been frozen in court and handed back to the local council.

 

I am now claiming job seekers allowance, what can he and cant he do.

 

By the way there are several violations to the codes of practice that he has not conformed to which I will contest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...