Showing results for '"british telecom"'.
-
gements for the hearing and when you would expect to have this agreed with British Telecom. It is still my feeling that you seem to have no intention of defending this claim and are simply procrastinating. In order to more speedily resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £2300 as full and final settlement of this particular claim. I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality. Please find enclosed another copy of my schedule of charges relating to this claim. I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim m
-
" Evidence that a call was made would be available to the Police from British Telecom records.
-
o is responsible under the Practice Direction for making arrangements with British Telecom(or other Supplier)arrangements must be made by the Claimant. The Applicant or Claimant must file no later than 4.00 pm on the last working day before the hearing a case summary not exceeding 500 words and draft directions agreed if possible, together with any documents necessary for the hearing but not already on the Court file" I'm completely thrown by this lot - have I been given the wrong notice i.e should this notice be for some other case? I cannot believe they are intending to treat a case involving £850 as a Fast Track. What is CRP23 par
-
s Home Authority for the company in question (for example, the local TS to British Telecom might have a direct working relationship with them) they may bring this up if they are resourced enough to do so. A lot of Trading Standards departments do not have large companies of this type within their area however, and therefore do not have the clout to approach them - also even without this to consider they are unlikely to have the resources to do more than forward the matter to the OFT who have a specialist unit to deal with unfair terms. Just mentioning this so you're not disappointed with any less than positive response you may get.
-
A friend has had problems with a stalker to the point that she moved houses. She made her phone and address ex-directory, but it seems to have become available. This has made her ballistic. I haven't had a landline in a while, but I thought they can't have your number in the directories without your permission? Should she sue them about this happenstance? I don't even know where to start. Ofcom?
-
Did BT infringe Proceeds of Crime Act in 2004
goodwill replied to goodwill's topic in Telecoms - mobile or fixed
premium rate' calls originate to Spain, the service is being invoiced from British Telecom therefore standard telecomunication rules apply. The place of supply of telecomunications services as defined in N741 12.9 is classed as being where the customer belongs. With the supplier and customer belonging in the UK, the supplier must account for VAT at the standard rate of 17.5%." Did the internet services BT were billing for exist? Can a bill for non-existant "goods and services" be regarded as a legal bill. Were the services being legally promoted and marketed? Does a single phone number on a bill constitute proof that a legal a -
ed below, there are many more; Sky Television £48.00 pa Ongoing British Telecom £18.00pa (from 1st May 2007) NTL/Telewest/Virgin £60.00pa (from 1st February) British Gas £60.00/£20pa (from 1st May 2007, billed Monthly/Quarterly) Carphone Warehouse £42.00pa Ongoing Consumers are being held to ransom, and are either being excluded from making purchases (Esure, the insurance company will only accept DD or card payments, cash or cheque are not acceptable). A further consideration is that consumers are being told that they (not the supplier) are being held wholly responsible for the costs of processing payments. T
-
o is responsible under the Practice Direction for making arrangements with British Telecom (or other supplier) arrangements must be made by the Claimant. The Applicant or Claimant must file no later than 4:00 pm on the last working day before the hearing a case summary not exceeding 500 words and draft directions agreed if possible, togather with copies of any documents necessary for the hearing but not already on file. to this: The hearing of this case will take place by way of a telephone conference The Defendant's Legal representative is ordered to arrange the telephone conference. Please quote telephone number xxxxxxxx
-
Claimant : British Telecom I have received the below letter from these Moorcroft people. ================================================= NOTICE OF INTENDED LITIGATION To Prevent the above action send payment in full before **/**/** or telephone **** *** **** immediately. If you do not respond to this letter we will assume you are purposely avoiding repayment of this debt and will take necessary steps to secure settlement which may include issuing legal action against you. Please not if legal action is necessary your debt will increase as follows Current balance : Solicitors costs for iss
-
e to your actual costs. If you do not cancel the above charges, I will sue British Telecom in court and will be asking for a breakdown of what the actual costs of reconnection and restoration of services are. Please also be aware that profiting from penalties is unlawful in Common Law. I will be happy to pay any proportionate costs that British Telecom has incurred due to the none payment of my bill, and would appreciate an invoice which details the actual realistic costs that I should pay. Please respond in 7 days, or else court proceedings will follow. Regards itsamomentintime
-
o is responsible under the Practice Direction for making arrangements with British Telecom (or other supplier) arrangements must be made by the Claimant. The Applicant or Claimant must file no later than 4:00 pm on the last working day before the hearing a case summary not exceeding 500 words and draft directions agreed if possible, togather with copies of any documents necessary for the hearing but not already on file. I have searched CPR23 and found: TELEPHONE HEARINGS 6.1 The court may order than an application or part of an application be dealt with by a telephone hearing. 6.1A The applicant shou
-
With the enthusiasm i had from this site,i sent another letter to British Telecom regarding a hacker who put an unnoticed auto dialler on my computer and i had a bill for £73.81.The original letter was sent in Feb 2005 and my second was 16/10/06. To my amazement on the 20/10/06 i had a phone call from INDIA,i for obvious reasons could hardly understand what he was saying, but i got the gist that they had my letter and were going to credit my 'telephone account' with the cost + my compound interest @ 9.9%.I said i wanted a cheque! I mentioned compensation and they offered £25,i refused that and asked for £50.We will come back to you M
-
rging me for paying cash,and supposed to have free broadband,no text yet British Telecom,this is an interesting one hacking into my computer,part bill for £73 need to start a new thread for this one.
-
or broadband should be free with contract no text message received yet ! British Telecom,this is an interesting one,hacking into my computer,part bill for £73.81,need to discuss this.Will start appropiate thread. -
I received my telephone bill the other day showing a late payment charge for the previous bill, and after less than two weeks, I had a phone call from BT (The person spoke barely recognizable english). Surely, this is harassment? And surely, isn't this late payment charge just as ulawful as the bank late charges? I intend to pay my bill by cheque and deduct the late payment charge. has anyone else done this with BT? Most businesses are given 30, 60 or 90 days to pay their bills. Why is the private consumer penalised (Illegally) with such charges??? Rhino69
-
Has anyone else noticed that British Telecom have started to apply "late payment" charges? The amount is only 5 GBP but I have not come across it before. A bit odd really given that the larger part of most peoples telephone bills aer service charges that are paid for in advance! Very graciously they do not charge VAT on the charge. I intend to take it up with them..will keep you all posted
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS