cash only. if you want to use a debit or credit card there is a £8.50 transaction fee . which i have to pass on.

beware my next letter will be in big red ink

warning

any who posts on this thread is liable to pay me £100. i,m a nice guy and will give a 50% discount if paid within 7 days. how about that for a saving.. i saved you £50 you should thank me.

i will want £100 after seven days otherwise i will send you some stupid letters that really look official. i might even call myself a solicitor. so dont get saying some else must have logged on. while your were having a cup of tea. i know a law that says you must tell me who it was or a judge will fine you £10.0000000.

i will of course give you some more chances before that happens. about 25 follow up letters.

after that i may give up

superb.

hope you stop around and help others on cag who are going through the same.

dont spend it all at once

only you know if there is an alternative for the ambulance to park. i know sometimes the drivers can be lazy and park in the nearest big space especially if its multi-drop . if there is an alternative place then suggest it to the care home and see what they say. you cant really go in and ask not to park there if there is no alternative. these people are infirm and in pain and need to be as close as possible.

its understandable that emergency services might need access to your flats. but this type of thing happens all over the country. parcel trucks mail vans etc. and sometimes because of the situation you have to grin and bear it. at least if there was an emergency the drivers are close by to move it.

sponse (xxxxxxxxx) 24/09/2011

 

 

the remote control is considered to be an accessory item and therefore is not covered by the manufacturers guarantee, therefore, a replacement TV cannot be issued.

not quite an accessory item if you need the remote to access features that can not be used without it.

they are trying. but i would ask them for something because of the hassle this has caused.

depending of the value. i would look for something around 10% of the value. so if you paid £450 that £45 DVD player looks nice.

it may be stat barred but until you write to them and educate about the limitations act they will still chase you. and mark entries on your credit file. they know its stat barred because they paid pennies in pound. but hide behind the fact they bought the debt and not the file. you need to tell them to close the account and set the debt to £0. doubt they'll remove the entry. worse part is the entry has an impact on your score

have you checked your CRA file

.

I am not trying to prove anything .

huh

Courts don't even deal with parking tickets .

sorry so when the bailiff comes and takes your car it hasn't been to court

i think i and many others have not got a faintest what you really want to prove. you have shouted off a bit.

the site is for people who have been through similar situations. and give their views and also may have knowledge of the law. not stick a soap box in the middle of the and see who and riddle and belittle as many people as they can

from you comment " I have personally had several million £s of PCNs declared invalid" send a cv to nick freeman

You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on.

producing a ticket after the event does not prove you paid for your car to be parked. it just shows someone paid for what car we don't know.

displaying does.

hence have you paid and displayed. not displayed you haven't paid.

seen plenty of people let it reach court with that way of thinking. and come away crying. courts must also have it wrong.

if your way of thinking was correct. the loop hole would have been closed a long time ago, as councils always do

What proof do the Council have that he didn't pay? The answer is none at all!

What proof does he have he did pay? The answer is a ticket for the time parked!

On the balance of probability who is telling the truth?

the council have photos of no ticket on display but a ticket was produced after the event . probabilities was is that he did pay and its is ticket. cancel the ticket. keeps happening then the probabilities will go down. ticket not cancelled. otherwise we could all have parking buddies each taking it in turns to buy a ticket and half our yearly parking at work etc. ok we would each get over 100 pcns year but your thinking they will all be cancelled

do you believe the OP bought a ticket or not? Simple yes or no will do.

i do.

but its not me he needs to convince.

i believe if its his first pcn he will have it cancelled. but if he tells me he does not like displaying them in the windscreen them you are gonna get a lot more

Whos problem is that?

 

I It simply states the OP did not pay the parking charge which as we all now know is incorrect.....he did! The contravention did not take place.......!!

i don't if he paid. says he did and produced a ticket. but that could mean he paid. could have been anyones.

i've just found a stub for the lee evans show last night at the NIA. does that mean i saw the show

call your local county court and tell the your warrant number. they will tell you if its live. it interesting that they have a warrant number when they also say referred for issue of a warrant. you cant have a warrant number unless its issued

a court bailiff is just a civil servant. they dont get bonus's or commission just a set wage. and a good to deal with ( still don't let one in the house)

steer clear of calling carters.

as i said call your local county court or even go in with the letter. they will tell you if you have a ccj against you. if its fake. complain to the oft for sending misleading letters.

if its right you have a ccj against you. then only deal with the court. by calling carters their only aim is to bleed you dry of money

you can suspend the warrant. £40 if your working or free if unemployed or on tax credits with child element

list all your out goings and i mean everything. and make an offer on a monthly basis.

carters nearly always reject the offer. so a judge will look at your income and outgoings and as long as you filled it in correctly he will make the order. this is how people get to pay £1 per month etc.

as long as you maintain the payments on not late paying them carters cant do nothing else

it sounds like your coming towards the limitation act. so carters may are trying it on.

if you have no ccjs for these. do not call carters under any circumstance

are you able to scan the letter taking out any identifiable information

upload it http://www.photobucket.com

check your credit file for any ccj's you must have a ccj before a warrant of execution is issued. northampton is the county court bulking centre.

if they have a ccj against you. then it sounds like your going to dealt with by a county court bailiff. in which case i would wait for their letter. they don't add extra charges on for visits etc.

when you get the letter. call him and he will tell you what the debt is about. ie cataloge phone bill.

if you agree its your debt. get him to send an n245 out. costs £40 but it done by the book. and even if carter don't accept you offer. the court in must cases force them too.

i would not call carters. in fact if they issue a warrant of execution the court expects carters to leave it in their hands.. i remember similar from a friend who started dealing with robbing way while a warrant of execution was in force and the bailiff cancelled the warrant

So what? The penalty is for not paying not for failing to display, why are you finding that so hard to grasp?

glad your not doing my appeal. i'd have cancelled and another one issued by admitting the offence

being UNFAIRLY pursued by greedy DCA's that have, repeatedly, shown no intention of following the rules.

and how many times have they got away with it. how many family's have gone with out food. how many mothers and father have thought they have failed because they cant afford food paying these crooks

this is why op needs to challenge the ticket. but last thing he wants to say is he left it on seat. he then admitting failing to display.

my recent parking ticket. when i posted on the site everyone was virtually saying i was guilty. but when i challenged it. it was cancelled. didn't have to go to appeal.

op needs to get all the positive comments and challenge it. but you must understand the negative comments because thats were the council are coming from. if you understand that. then your challenge will be strong.

councils are not the law. i got a pcn and the code fail to pay and display. even though it was displayed i challenged it and it was dismissed. their reasons were the ceo believed the ticket on display was tampered with. however if i would photocopy the ticket and send it via post they would review it. my reply was for them to forward a cheque for £10 for my time photocopying. .

next day they called me via telephone saying they don't work that way.

she offered to send a prepaid envelope. i said ok i only need £5 for ink and paper and my time. again she said we don't pay its not the councils policy. i pointed out it doesn't say that in the t&g on the machine. i said ok if i send it and proved it was genuine would they then pay me.

after speaking to her manager its was agreed i could send a digital photo to her email address. not normal policy but we will an exception. she told me.

heres part of their reply

Dear Mr xxxxxxx,

Your case file notes have been passed to me for reply. I can confirm

that Mrs Lynn has rescinded the penalty charge notice recorded against

your vehicle. I wish to preface my remarks by offering my sincere

apologies for any inconvenience that we may have caused to you. I am

wholly satisfied that your ticket is a valid legal

document and can appreciate your dismay in having received a penalty

charge notice especially when the ticket was clearly and prominently

displayed in the vehicle's windscreen

In the case of the CEO who issued the penalty charge notice to your

vehicle I would reiterate that his actions, although erroneous, were

well intentioned and he has expressed his regret that he got it wrong

and caused you some inconvenience. He honestly believed that the date

had been altered. He has been advised that in a similar situation in

future he should contact the Parking Office for further advice. I am

unable to supply you with specific details but the CEO concerned does

not have a poor track record

I am very conscious of the fact that this episode has made you very

cross. I am also very aware of the fact that Councils should be wholly

transparent in their dealings with the community that we serve and where

errors are made a speedy resolution is reached. I would conclude by

writing that it was never our intention to cause you difficulties and

inconvenience but I would respectfully ask that on this occasion you

accept our explanation for the mistake. I hope that my explanation has

gone some small way in redeeming us and I would once again extend my

sincere apologies.

Yours sincerely

Mr x xxxxxxxx - Operations Manager Sefton MBC Parking Services Dept

was the tracking purely because he was a suspect for something.

they can use it as evidence even though he wasn't warned. like employers installing hidden cameras. if you caught stealing your sacked.

depends if what your saying.

if they suspect gross misconduct. then yes they can fit a tracker without telling the employee

if its a matter of standard practice. then you should be made aware your movements are being tracked. if you have a union. then they should have known this.

we carry handheld trackers. the union negotiated that it would be only for heath and safety issues only and only when the panic button is activated would the release were the device was.

you should have had warning they were applying for a warrant for forced entry. but they don't tell you when

i like the part

it was stated that “Mr

Green confirms that he states he is a lawyer”. Mr Green referred to his

contact with the Law Society in the early 1990s and attached an e-mail

from the Solicitors Regulatory Authority that confirmed that a lawyer is

“someone who worked in the legal profession, a very broad definition

does that make the cleaner in the crown court a barrister

Anybody want to be my parking buddy. The idea is inspired by Green-and-Mean. And is seemingly foolproof! This is how it works. When we agree to be parking buddies we co-ordinate shopping trips etc. We meet up at an arranged time with a car each. One of us pays for parking (you preferably, if you don't mind) and then go our separate ways. We meet back at the cars just before expiry of time. Your car will be fine and clear of PCN as you have paid. My car may, and probably will have a PCN on it. Not to worry, this is the clever bit. I can prove that i paid by showing your time and date relevant P/D as proof of payment in my appeal.

This system will work spectacularly well in dual use bays. You see, I will have absolute and definitive proof that I did pay.

Any interest...hello...anybody!!!

as the appeals office roll over with laughter putting their letter together appeal dismissed

Q: What is the alledged contravention?

A: Failing to pay the parking charge

Q: Did he pay?

A: only got op word for it. all pcn's would be cancelled if it was a defence to produce ticket after the event.

Q: Did the alledged contravention take place?

A: yes. photos will show it.

Q: Just how hard is that to comprehend

A: Obviously for some people.....very hard!!

hot air

i'd say ok i'll wait for the judge to ask me