Mr Xxxxx drew to my attention that the payment slip states that payment must be made in 14 days beginning when the notice is served. This of course is wrong and contrary to the correct instruction in the body of the notice. In R (Barnet) v The Parking Adjudicator, CO/3355/2006, (judgment 2 August 2006), Mr Justice Jackson stated that a payment slip is not part of the penalty notice. That case involved an on-street penalty. This case involves a penalty notice-comprising documents-served by post. I can therefore distinguish the judgment. In any event in the case of Hackney Drivers Association Limited v The Parking Adjudicator and Lancashire County Council CO/7565/2012 on 31st October 2012 Mr. Justice Raynor when considering a penalty notice asked at paragraph 11 of his judgment, "what was fairly conveyed by the penalty notice, read as a whole?" The recipient requires certainty. I find that the recipient of the penalty notice document read as a whole does not receive certainty. I will therefore allow the appeal. I find that there is no requirement to make judgment on the adequacy of the signage issues.

Search on the PATAS register of appeals for the term Contravention Location: Old Ruislip Rd / Hawtrey Avenue Northolt It is all detailed there. I don't want to post names and reg numbers here

@ AJohn92 Did you manage to get your PCN cancelled? I had my appeal allowed for entry into Hawtrey Avenue from Old Ruislip Road, between 08h00 and 09h00 by the PATAS Adjudicator. Deficiency in the PCN...

I won my case on Appeal with the PATAS adjudicator.

I have also received a PCN for the entry into Hawtrey Avenue from Old Ruislip Road. I have my PATAS hearing on 21 March and would be most grateful to hear from salu_999 what your thoughts are on the signage? I had no idea until I received the PCN that I had entered this no-go area. I went back and used my dashcam (which wasn't on, on the morning of the "offence") and the signs aren't visible until you have actually made the turn into Hawtrey Avenue.