Number6
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
1,819 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Number6
-
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Does anyone know a good publisher? Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
What a good idea! Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
What exactly is a weridos? Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
I must admit I was thinking more along the lines of a "lets see how drunk we can get by midnight" sort of party!! Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Not that I'm tryinge to coerce an invite of course!! Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Really? Room for one more? Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Don't buy a Sony VAIO whatever you do. I've seen better put together Etch-a-Sketch's Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
I won't mention that a couple of weeks ago I got given, free and gratis an eight months old, fully working Sony VAIO then... Pete -
So, what happened? Pete
-
SLC Cannot Supply The Original Agreement
Number6 replied to baconbuttyman's topic in Student loans/SLC
Also according to the DTI timetable: This seems to be doublespeak to a certain extent as CCA 1974 (127) (3) and (4) state that the court shall not make an enforcement order if the agreement was not properly executed whereas CCA 1974(127)(5) states: and seems to imply that a court shall not make an enforcement order if the agreement is not properly executed, i.e. in the 1974 act (3) and (5) were mutually exclusive (under CCA 1974 (127)(5)the court could enforce even if (3) was breached) and under the 2006 amendment this enforceability power is removed totally. CCA 1974 (127)(1) and (2) remain as reasonable safeguards also. This is good, isn't it?? Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Merry Christmas everyone!!! Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Deleted -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Deleted -
I can't find it at the moment but there is a test in law about whether you should have realised that you received a sum of money in error; in some cases you have to pay it back but in others you don't and it depends on the "test". But this wasn't a deposit "in error" anyway - the creditor is claiming they gave you a loan that you asked for so if they cannot produce the agreement and you could reasonably argue that you wouldn't have noticed the money going into your account then you could possibly keep it anyway - very grey area I think. Pete
-
If the "lender" has not provided a copy of the agreement, and the 12 day time limit has passed then they are in default and any alleged agreement is unenforceable. You are within your rights to: a) cease any and all payments b) demand repayment of all monies that you have paid to the "creditor" + interest within 14 days c) complain the the FSA and Trading Standards about the lack of compliance with your CCA Section 77 request If they don't confirm to you that no agreement exists and they don't refund your money + interest then commence a claim process by sending them a Letter Before Action giving them 14 days to respond positively. If they still don't play ball then issue an N1 via your local county court for repayment. Pete
-
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
I can see you!! -
SLC Cannot Supply The Original Agreement
Number6 replied to baconbuttyman's topic in Student loans/SLC
They may well try to pass it to a DCA...... but what are they going to pass on? If they couldn't send me the original agreement then q.e.d. there is no agreement and therefore nothing to pass to a DCA. Any DCA that is silly enough to buy the debt will be speedily told that they need to produce the appropriate paperwork. Pete -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
What PM's????? -
Dayglo's mission to get his life back!
Number6 replied to dayglo's topic in Data Protection and Default Issues
Pete -
SLC Cannot Supply The Original Agreement
Number6 replied to baconbuttyman's topic in Student loans/SLC
I thought so! Pete -
SLC Cannot Supply The Original Agreement
Number6 replied to baconbuttyman's topic in Student loans/SLC
Please don't misinterpret my comments anyone, I'm not in any way defending the lenders or their tactics. I am only pointing out that the law allows them to send an unsigned "generic" copy in response to your S77/78 request in order to comply. This is completely seperate to the enforceability or otherwise of the agreement. My view is that if the lender sends me a "generic" document then they don't have the original signed copy. I have written to all bar one of my CC companies telling them that IMO there is no agreement and I'm not paying them any more. As an aside one of my major "alleged creditors" that is in "criminal default" has now written to me stating: "Your current balance is scheduled to be written off as bad debt imminently" Pete -
SLC Cannot Supply The Original Agreement
Number6 replied to baconbuttyman's topic in Student loans/SLC
LOL!!! Pete
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
- Create New...