Hi, You also state that you took photos in the building, did you get written permission to take pictures on a private premises ? If you did not, they can use this against you as well . Regards

Hi, Fallen for what trap ???? Did your oh not know that he could not ask for the code ? If it is normally an open and public area does that mean anyone of the street can walk in ? If that is correct what is the point of an access code ? Regards

Hi, you state that 75 other people have codes, do they have the same code or does everyone have there own specific code ? Surely there must be something written in a contract or in the terms and conditions that state you cannot share a secure access code ? otherwise what would the point of the codes be ? Regards

Hi, They could argue, that as you have stated previously in the blog, that other half had reguarly visited your work and helped you in work and the case that you worked there as a manager, he would have been well aware that he could not use the code without a certain level of authorisation, even if supplied by a member of staff, the fact that he asked for it would have broken there rules ? Regards

Hi, I would presume that they can prove what code was used however as OH half for a code or key he used what he was given eg CODE. sorry a bit confused by the above statement ? what do you mean ? They released CCTV to me of my other half as proof that i commited one of the allegations. ( They now have confirmed i did no wrong). did they have to release this via sar you filed ? i thought you said that they had released no cctv footage ?? Regards

Hi, After speaking to the ET today they didn't seem to think so, they stated i could request anything they were going to use. do you mean that the et will not force them to produce the cctv to you ? I do not know, they have never told me the code used and OH cannot remember the code as he used it once and it wasn't really inportant at the time so he didnt remember it. can the company prove what codes were used ? are they logged anywhere ? So surely releasing CCTV of a member of the public and only a member of the public would be the same yet the company did that. what cctv did they release and to who ? Just for the record no action was taken by the company against this member of staff. VERY CONSISTANT LOL !!! how are you so sure ? have you spoken to the member of staff in question ? Regards

Hi, is the staff member that gave your oh code, the same one that was there when police incident happened ? If they have cctv they will have to release it as the et will force them to. so was the code oh used the same as your code ? When oh signed in was there any rules and regulations on where he could access and procedures etc ? even if the other staff members hand is in the cctv fotage they can dispute its release for fear of reprisals. Regards

Hi, I wouldnt worry about the evidence, you will get to see it all before you go to et, they may be witholding the cctv due to an objection from the other staff memeber in the cctv. Even if the staff member gave your oh the code this still does not give him authorisation to use it, how does the code thing work ? what codes do you have and how many different ones? did your oh use his own code ? Regards

Hi, I am just as confused as you ! They fired you for allegation 4 but never disscussed it, they just received your statement ? So you was fired without ever disscussing or seeing any evidence regarding allregation 4, did you raise this at the appeal ? Regards

Hi, But you did take along a prepared statement to the disciplinary ? What did they say abouth this ? Regards

Hi, so was allegation 4 never disscussed at the discipolinary meeting in any form ? Regards

Hi, Also after speaking to OH Union we now have another angle to take on allegation 4 ourselves which we feel can also prove this happened as OH stated and not as company have suggested. Just to let you know if you have any new evidence you must declare it and make it available to the other side before the et, if you do not then you will be unable to use it on the day. Regards

Hi, Was all evidence shown or offered at the investigatory meeting ? If it was and this was minuted then it does show that the company presented and gave you all the evidence. Regards

Hi, It sounds like you will only be going to et for allegation 4, but allegation 1-3 will be brought up as it is relevant to the case. Once et have received all the defence and evidence it can take up till april before it goes to court. I would be very carefull having your other half represent you, as from what i can understand allegation 4 involves him. the company may use this and play this angle. Regards

Hi, It is definetly relevant, because if you had admited that you allways intended going to an ET before the appeal hearing, it shows you never had no intention to follow the process and are just looking for a quick buck ! Regards

Hi, i would advise checking all your evidence to be sure Regards

Hi, so you definetly did not say you was going or thinking about ET actions before appeal hearing either verbally or in writing ? If you have this could be very damaging, as it shows you had no intention of following the procedures of the appeal. Regards

Hi, so you definetly did not say you was going or thinking about ET actions before appeal hearing either verbally or in writing ? By saying you are open to offers, implies that you are only seeking a financial settlement ? is this true ? Regards

Hi, when did you tell the company you was taking them to ET ? Was it after the appeal hearing ? Have you asked the company for any compensation prior to the appeal hearing ? Regards

Hi, The best advice is to state nothing but facts and have lots of evidence, do not get personnal. But be very wary, the company have probably had a team of solicitors, staff and management all working on there defence, so they will be very well prepared. Just make sure that you are as well. Regards

Hi, Totally agree with you mariefab Regards

Hi, What evidence do you have to prove that she is lying ? Is it concrete proof ? Regards

Hi, I can only advise you to definetly not contact her or even contact her through friends. this could be seen as trying to pervert the course of justice. Regards

Hi, Has she left the company yet ? If she has not the company may persuade her to stay ! The witness statement is evidence and will have to be submitted. Regards

Hi, I would strongly advise against contacting her yourself, it could be seen as aggressive and threatning, due to things in her witness statement. I would definetly not call her as a witness, say if she has not forgotten ? it will make your case a lot worse. Are you representing yourself in the ET ? Regards