Porkies here everyone. I am sure that there are people who will know Natasha was not working for Frank and was using the BOE not the CCA. There is evidence out there proving this. So many people have had their files wrecked from this system. They have had their balances increased because payments were stopped and late charges etc incurred. The documents are out there with dates on showing this. The system failed completely leaving clients Natasha was acting for totally shafted. No refunds were offered for her services leaving a real mess for everyone to sort out. These clients that I speak of were nothing to do with Frank and he had no involvement but can you imagine the problem when they want their refunds after the system was supposed to be 100% success unlike the CCA. And joining Tate Lloyd she was a partner as in Natasha Tate/Geoff Lloyd. I can't understand why all the focus is on Frank and not also her as she ran this system that wrecked everything. I want to know where this system came from.

Interesting, because Natasha and Frank always maintained that the system was working fine for his clients. It may still be worth having them looked at through the CCA route with a no win no fee solicitor just because the capital required to pay them off is usually too much. I wish you well with this nightmare. Well, why did Frank not get his own mortgages wiped?? As if it is possible!!!

What? Trotters and FG in a golden micra on their way to see City Legal/Tate Lloyd/Natasha Tate based in London, Paris, New York and what is that other big city? Oh yes, Swansea!!!!!

Can a property search be done in his name/s to see what he actually owns in the UK? Google a property search company near you and see if this can de done without his authority.

Rush1, Have your credit cards been through just the Bills Of Exchange Act system (Natasha's ) or the Consumer Credit one aswell? Are the lenders going to push for sale of your house? Have you tried agreeing a settlement figure with them?

Beginning to wonder if this is a comedy thread!!!

No he is no way as good looking as in the photo

Yes, I like you. I think we have the same sense of humour!! You really could not make this all up if you tried, really. Except that, it is so serious. My credit file is wrecked, my clients have had their's wrecked and I am having to refund. Natasha never offered to refund her fees. Surely with Frank's clients she should at least refund her fees as they paid for something that did not work. The same for mine. With regard to the balance, well I understand that he is employed part time as an air pilot. Well he was, not sure if he is. If he is then could some of his earnings be attached to refund. I wonder if there is a legal way to do this. Legal advice is required here. I don't think it is enough just leaving it to the fraud squad, no offence but a legal brain is required here, no not you Natasha, a real legal brain. The problem is our government departments are somewhat laidback. If anyone knows a lawyer who would take this on. I think there has to be a way to get his earnings deducted regularly. See, all may not be lost. Now anyone know a good lawyer in this field?

Tinkers - come on and explain. I think Rush thinks you are a law firm. Have I missed a post on here which states Tinkers is. Rush, Natasha did the Bill Of Exchange Act system. Frank passed the work to her. Yes, after referring the whole process to a lawyer, and after a certain precedent by a judge, the whole process is exactly as you so eloquently put it. I kept telling Natasha it is not working, where did you get this system from, etc etc. She just was blase about the whole matter and said the banks would walk away. She was insistent it would come off the credit files etc etc. The problem is she takes no responsibility. Initially, she blamed Geoff Lloyd and now Frank. She ran with this system and ignored concerns raised that it was problematic. I guess it is a learning experience, not to trust anyone. Natasha was part of City Legal Services, now you tell me does that or does not sound like a law firm? This firm of Natasha and Geoff also had letterheads stating New York, London, Paris. Has anyone else out there been in receipt of this early last year? What a joke!!!! The problem is if you are used to dealing in a professional environment, you do not expect to encounter this kind of deception.

To Oreogal, Did Russell really say National Finance was his company? Wow.

You commented to Tinker which inferred she had your papers. I was just wondering why you would say that

Surprise surprise. Is this why he did not use reputable law firms to conduct his activities? They would perhaps have checked him out. This has gone round and round in my head for months and this is the explanation surely?

Did she say she had your paperwork?

Companies House information does not reflect this I presume? Do they not check out directors first?

This becomes stranger by the day. Natasha and Bianca Klinkmuller question raised on this site by another poster Frank and whatever his name is? How more bizarre can this get?

Yes I wondered about that. I think it is Natasha's son. Strange though, because I also have a William Waters on some aswell. Could he be Russell Water's son?

Another matter, if one is employed by a company as Natasha says she was she would be paid a salary not a per item fee. Frank entrusted his clients to her.

Well done Tinkers! One matter of great amusement to all, when Natasha finally accepted that the Bill Of Exchange Act route was not working she started the cca route using letter templates from this site!! She thought she was going to be as big as Cartel. I have an email stating such. Natasha is responsible for most of the issues faced here. Frank, however, should have realised she was well out of her depth and she did not have the intelligence or integrity to admit such. Most likely because living in Swansea jobs are difficult to find and in law an impeccable career history is essential. Most people posting on here have had issues with the loans and credit cards which Natasha dealt with. The mortgages are another matter and were routed elsewhere. No idea where although I know many contacts in the industry would not touch Frank, I made sure of it not because I had dealings with him but because I failed to understand why he continued to get Natasha to do the legal paperwork when she was not qualified to do so. It just did not make any sense at all. It also concerned me that Natasha walked away from all the Claim Management Clients so easily. If Frank had integrity why would he use someone useless and unqualified? I think he wanted to help her, no doubt but is still does not make any sense. Could it be that law firms would not deal with him because they felt he was not squeaky clean? It really does not add up. Could it be that he was uncomforable using a law firm because further down the line he intended to do a runner with people's money. This would make sense.

What do you mean in the company of him? He is an ugly little s...t. I am only 5ft and he was not much taller than me. He would probably be on most women's totally unshaggable list. He was not driving a micra when I met him but his car did not reflect any level of success. Because of his age he easily forgot what he had said previously and he would answer the same question with different answers. This always made me question in my mind what was going on. The amount of time he spent in Spain always concerned me because he could fly off there to safety when matters became too hot for him. For a normal woman, I would say he was not a charmer because his looks were so unattractive. I can see how some men can charm people into conning them but as I said he is an ugly little so and so. Sorry this is an objective fact.

Thanks Princess, the police are wanting this information.

In what way has she been taken in. Not true.

Which Police Force are dealing with the Frank Galler matter. I know who is dealing with the rest.

Has anyone on here had credit cards supposedly cleared on the Bills Of Exchange Act route? If so, what has been the result? How did Frank's introducers sell this in? Have any businesses out there been offered by Frank to manage the admin for a 5% cut. I was and refused. I wonder if this was genuine or a way to take more money. Has anyone got papers from Frank/Natasha with Finance Angels on it? Spanish market - what was going on here. Introducers, where did the paperwork go? Was this an out and out [problem] or a situation where Frank had cashflow problems and diverted the money elsewhere. I wonder, the address Murcia raises questions. Many UK people have lost money in property in this over built region. If his primary business is property and he has interests in Murcia, then more than likely he will have cashflow problems. It is likely that he has been struggling to meet his financial obligations to banks and diverted funds to meet these. This could explain alot. I don't believe he did not send paperwork to be processed. So what happened to these? This is an open question for the public. Natasha Tate - please do not answer this. The public need the truth here. So please public come on and give us information.

Lies lies lies. I did not work with Frank. You got him to call me to reassure me that the system worked even though it did not. You accused me of being insecure about the system. Yes I was. It did not work. Lies lies lies. Frank visited me because he had another plan - to use my name and licence number I think. I have no evidence that he did this. I asked for help with the secured loan client you completely messed up and he messed up aswell. In the end it was a reputable law firm that helped me out and actually a firm that would not deal with you or Frank as both of you had developed reputations of a negative nature by then. Facts please no lies. Don't try and drag me into your dealings.

So you are not prepared to show me the evidence that you think I gave you authority to use my company name for Frank's clients. If you had my authority, why did you deny using my name? Stop posting on here as you have nothing useful to add. We don't want lies, we want answers. I want to know where you and Geoff Lloyd obtained this Bill Of Exchange Act system. You and Frank laughed at me when I said you should have got council opinion on this. Others who will have been through this system want answers. You have ruined my credit file. One of my clients ended up with a charging order on his house and you know he is in his 70s. You assured him and assured him everything would be ok. You just lie and lie and lie.