Nothing much happening at the min but i havent gone away ypu know

Maybe all CQ victims should have a whip round and try to get them a new brain cell to go with the one they all share...as its obviously defective:) Its a timeshare cell , all the DCAs get it a fortnight a year. Could be coming to a DCA near you soon .

Zimmie are you in N.I if so and they send you court papers for Northhampton just sit back and let them hang themselves on the big long legal rope.

Now SP read the reply to my letter , they operate legally at all times

yes and the more we get to hear about the better. Seemingly their punishment is the loss of fees, hardly what you might call a deterrent. Prob 1 in every 100 makes a complaint or is unaware of the law , i certainly wasnt till i came here. Suzi you should enquire as to how their "ERROR" came about, there might be a small possibility your form was put in the wrong pile, but if they did that to you surely they wouldnt make the same mistake twice and do it with mine as well

Did you point out their " ERROR " ? or did they put their hands up? Strange no mention of compensation , did they threaten at any stage to try and enforce the judgement?

They should do Skint , but best watched. Have you paid them any money?

Thanks for your recent correspondence regarding my complaints with your company. However in view of the seriousness of your actions and the poor apology you have issued i feel i must take this matter further. Your excuse other than an error in bringing action against me in a court that has no jurisdiction does not suffice. In your letter dated June 16th you stated “As you will appreciate we have already committed to the full use of the court process and this will continue “My view is that you were committed to abusing the court process and this will continue until you are taken to task over your illegal practices. As a regular user of the MCOl I’m sure you were quite aware of the guidelines set down for the use of the service, I have never been to the site before now and it was blatantly obvious to me within five minutes that people without an address in England or Wales could not and should not be processed through the center. I believe that your company was fully aware of the slack procedures at the MCOL and decided that a cheap CCj was ideal way of attempting to extract payments for me for a debt i dispute. When you submitted your papers to the center you would have been required to sign a statement of truth, which your company duly signed knowing quite well that your statement was incorrect and unlawful. By committing this offence you have called into question your eligibility to hold a consumer credit license. In light of your lack of explanation on this matter i must assume that this action was a serious abuse of process which your company entered into knowingly and willingly. The fact that this illegally obtained ccj was entered on to my credit file is an act of libel against me. Therefore i must consider my options on dealing with this matter in the courts. Further to that your company tried to use the CCJ ,you had issued illegally to frighten and harass me into making payments also indicating the use of bailiffs. I’m sure that being in the business you are in, the threat of bailiffs is a useful tool, however i am also sure you are aware that bailiffs do not exist in N. Ireland, unsure if i was aware of that fact you decided to try and harass me with the threat of using them, whilst also implying that you had the legal power to do so In light of my complaint and by way of apology you have now decided to write off a disputed debt , which you have stated as £684.46 , oddly enough in your letter dated 16th June you were prepared to accept £386.99 , this debt probably cost your company one fifth of its face value , a derisory amount and quite honestly laughable . In my complaint to your company i requested that you compensate me for your actions, i note that you failed to address my request in your reply. In view of all the stated facts I’m afraid that you have left me with no option other than to keep my previously arranged appointment with Gerard Adams MP ( 4th Aug ) with regards to him speaking to the relevant minister about your behavior. As you requested after receiving my complaint I delayed lodging complaints to the OFT and the financial Ombudsman regarding these issues until you had your right of reply , however as i have mentioned above the word ERROR does not justify your actions and i feel that you have not taken the possible consequences of these actions very seriously. However in the interest of fairness i will allow you seven days to reconsider your apology along with an offer of compensation that reflects the seriousness of these matters.. If i have not received a response from you within the stated seven days I will forward my complaints to the relevant bodies and contact my solicitor .with regards to bringing this matter to the courts. REPLY You raise a number of issues in you letter i will deal with them in numbered paragraphs as below. 1 You describe this companys letter of 17th july as a poor apology , you go on to say that are excuse that an error resulted in action being bought in a court that has no jurisdiction was not sufficient . I see that our letter contained an unreserved apology for the inconvience that you had been caused . I do not regard what was said to you as an excuse . It is a fact that an error occured . I can do no more than repeat the apology and explanation. .When we compile lists of accounts where litigation may be approiate we seperate accounts of persons living in England and Wales from those that live in Scotland and Northern Ireland . It appears that an oversight resulted in that seperation taking place in the case of your account with the result that it was grouped with other accounts for claims to be issued in England and Wales . 2 You state that it is your view that this company was commited to abusing the court process and this would continue until we are taken to task over illegal practises . I do not consider that you have any foundation for that view. This company seeks at all times to conduct litigation within the civil procedure rules in England and Wales or their equivalent in other jurisdictions . We do not undertake illegal practises . I cannot accept that your view has any foundatio. 3 you mention MCOL . A claim was issued through the claims production centre in Northhampton which is a centre used by users who issue large numbers of claims . Users are not required to sign a statement of truth for each claim but the submission of claims to the centre are on the same basis as if a statement of truth was signed 4 You state that this company was fully aware of the slack procedures at MCOL and decided a cheap ccj was an ideal way of attempting to extract payments from you for a debt you dispute. The issue of the claim against you was not a result of informed decision to issue a claim where there was no jurisdiction. Your belief to the contrary has no foundation. Your statement is the first indication which has been made to the company that you dispute the debt . You will see in our letter of 17th July that we listed the 8 letters that were written to you during 2007 . You did not contact us in response to any of those letters to inform us that the debt was disputed . A claim form was issued by Northhampton court . You did not contact us or the court at that time to inform us that the claim was disputed or to point out that you live in Northern Ireland . OK you got me it was all my fault oops sorry about that. Even now you do not state your grounds for disputing the debt. 5 you state that this company signed a statement of truth knowing quite well that our statement was incorrect and unlawful. As I explained, we do not actually sign a statement of truth, but nevertheless your statement is incorrect. You have no knowledge as to whether the submission of your claim was done in the knowledge that it was incorrect or through error. I consider it inappropriate for you to make a statement in these terms. 6 You refer to a lack of explanation. Our letter dated 17th July informed you that the claim had been issued in error. I have now set out above how that error arose. 7 You state that you assume the action was a serious abuse of process which this company entered into knowingly and willingly. You have no foundation for that assumption. 8 You state that the County Court Judgement was entered on your credit file and is an act of libel against you. We are taking steps to have the CCJ set aside and will ensure that your credit file is updated to remove all record of the judgement following it being set aside. 9 You state that this company tried to use a CCJ which has been issued illegally to frighten and harass you into making payments. At all times, this company was attempting lawfully to collect a debt which we did not consider to be disputed. In error a claim was issued against you in the MCOL. There has been no attempt to frighten or harass you. 10 You mention an indication of the use of bailiffs. We are aware that Northern Ireland Enforcement is through the NI Court Enforcement Office. This letter was generated as part of a process following a judgement. The sending of the letter flowed from the same initial error issued in the claim. 11 You asked for compensation. I note that you have already been offered compensation of £686.46 in the form of the writing off of your debt. You claim that this is not adequate and the debt is disputed but you have not explained the nature of that dispute or why you have not previously raised that dispute. You go on to state that we failed to address your request in our letter of 17th July. May I draw your attention to the penultimate paragraph in which you were asked to provide any documents showing that you have been turned down for credit since the judgement was obtained. That request was made so that we can evaluate whether you have incurred any damages as a result of our error. You may be awaare that should you pursue this matter through the courts, as you state to be your intentions, the quantifications of your damages will be evaluated as the losses you have sustained. The level of any damages will not be calculated as to penalise this company. You have already been given the benefit of £684.46 and we will argue that yu should only receive monetary compensation if you are able to demonstrate to a court that you have sustained loss in excess of that figure. The position would be different if you were able to satisfy the court that your reasons for disputing the debt are valid, but as you have not indicated the nature of the dispute, we cannot comment upon that. 12 In the final paragraph of your letter you set out the actions you will take should we not make an offer of compensation that reflects the seriousness of these matters. This company does not seek to hide from the consequences of its actions. In this case, an error has occured. We have made an unreserved apology for that error. We have nformed you that the error will be rectified by having the judgement set aside. We have compensated you by writing off the full balance of the debt. We have agreed to investigate any issues that might have arisen from you being turned down for credit since the judgement was obtained. I'm sure Mr. Adams and the institutions you list in your letter would agree that it would be wrong for me to offer compensation over and above an appropriate figure purely to avoid complaints being made. I remain willing to consider any information you care to provide us as to your reasons for disputing the debt and any evidence of loss which you have incurred as a result of this companys error. Should these factors alone justify a review of the compensation that been offered to you, then I will reconsider it. CCA? whats the success rate cap 1 circa 2006

I was referring to capquest not cap 1

You mean give the MCOL my claim number and let them deal with it. Im of the belief that cap might drag their feet rather than owning up to MCOL the longer it stays the better , especially after they said they would remove it . This is all new to be folks and all input is appreciated .Will get the mrs to type up their full letter and there might be different views.

Capquest stated in their last letter that they are not afraid to face the cosequences of their actions, i want them to eat their words and firmly believe this is the way to do it . If i can get the Gerry fella on board then there might be a way of hitting both . Another thing they said in their letter was that they believed their apology would be seen as fair by Gerry.

MCOL are being to coy for my liking , this is copy of email i sent them and their response. I am well aware that your guideline states that only people who reside in England and Wales can be processed through your court. However i do not live in England or Wales and i have had a county court judgement issued against me through MCOL . I have contacted the company involved and they state they made an error . These companies are supposed to be profesional and to provide the word Error as an excuse is beyond belief. I would appreciate if you could answer the following questions for me 1 How can a judgement be entered in my case ? I have never had an address inside of your jurisdiction 2 What procedures in place to stop this happening ? 3 Do you are rely on DCAs providing you with statements of truth on these maters ? 4Was the statement of truth in my case perjury. 5 What disaplinary action is taken against DCAs for knowinly breaking the law ? 6 What recourse do i have against this company? RESPONSE Good afternoon, Thank you for your email. As the claims are issued online there is no human intervention and it is the responsibility of the claimant to ensure that the claim is correctly issued. If claims are issued in error these will be referred to a District Judge and the claim struck out and the issue fee is non refundable. If you have a claim issued against you incorrectly then please provide the claim number, we can then refer to the District Judge for the judgment to be set aside and the claim struck out. If you have any further enquiries, please check our online Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) section Info about - County court bulk centre - money claim online Too many unanswered questions . Basically it seems that the DCA doesnt get its money back , ouch that hurts. They aint getting my claim number , i think thats the other crowds job to sort out

There was an email sent to Gerry informing him of what has occured . I have made him aware of MCOLs now official statement that there is absolutely no manual intervention with regards claims , and that it is up to the DCAs to be HONEST:confused:. I have requested that he intervene and try getting some answers from MCOL regarding how many ccjs have been issued . The other crowd can stew a while see if i can dig up evidence of mass ERRORS.

Solicitors cost , a luxury i can ill afford nomillo , im saving up so as i can class myself as poor .

I will be concentrating on MCOL until i get what i want from them , no reply from them regarding procedures , etc . I will give them the ten days that they state on their website to reply. Im off down town to apply for credit in every shop , prob wont get it though because i have a ccj against me . That would be capquests fault now wouldnt it.

Got their reply this morning , just what i was expecting. My papers were put in the wrong pile for litigation ,one pile for England/ Wales the other Scotland and here. In reply to my statement that they knowingly went to the wrong court . NO FOUNDATION You have no knowledge as to whether the submission of your claim was incorrect or through error , We consider it innappropriate for you to make a statement in these terms. You mention the indication of the use of bailifs . We are aware that in Northern Ireland the enforcement is through the Northern Ireland enforcement office The letter was generated as part of the process following a judgement . The sending of the letter flowed from the same initial error as the judgement. A lot of other gumf folks but basically they say there are no foundations for any of my accusations , they consider their apology adequete and believe that any of the relevant bodies will agree with them . They say if i can prove that i was refused credit because of the ccj they would compensate me . Or if i can successfully dispute the debt and take them to court . Far to much crap for me to type up over two pages at the min but will get it done. Whats the success rate for wins over cap 1s agreements circa 2006 ?

Well at least it should be a source of amusement over the forecast wet weekend.

Yeah i can be assured of crap

Just emailed my Capquest contact she says quite a long letter winging its way to me from the HEAD of their complaints dept. Posted first class yesterday . First class , and the HEAD of dept ! boys a boys

I will submit it to them , i havent actually raised a complaint with them as yet , i just find it strange that i have mentioned my lovely ccj 3 times and not one of them has went OH THAT shouldnt happen please do tell us all about it. ! I had originally contacted them to try assertain how many illegally issued ccjs they have on their books , but without claim numbers they wont tell me , now if i had the claim numbers i would already have the information i require, its like talking to a DCA

The MCOL state that unless i have claim numbers they are unable to supply details of any ccjs , freedom of information act or not. Of course i can give them mine , i want them to tell me how they prevent these cases arising , if they cant tell me then it will become blatantly obvious that they dont care .

My reply I am well aware that your guideline states that only people who reside in England and Wales can be processed through your court. However i do not live in England or Wales and i have had a county court judgement issued against me through MCOL . I have contacted the company involved and they state they made an error . These companies are supposed to be profesional and to provide the word Error as an excuse is beyond belief. I would appreciate if you could answer the following questions for me 1 How can a judgement be entered in my case ? I have never had an address inside of your jurisdiction 2 What procedures are in place to stop this happening ? 3 Do you are rely on DCAs providing you with statements of truth on these maters ? 4Was the statement of truth in my case perjury. 5 What dissaplinary action is taken against DCAs for knowingly breaking the law ? 6 What recourse do i have against this company?

Recieved this mail from MCOL Thank you for your email. Please be advised that Money Claim Online can only be used if both the claimant and defendant have an address within England or Wales for the service of court documents and claims outside of this jurisdiction cannot be issued through us. (WANNA BET ? ) Also please note that we are unable to view any case details without a claim number. Now in three seperate emails i have sent them i stated quite clearly i was aware of the rules of jurisdiction and had still had an illegal judgement made against me . They in their 3 replys have still to mention anything about any illegal judgements. I think this backs up Spamheeds theory

Got an email from MCOL the guy dealing with me is checking to see if i can have the information . Nothing from Cap as yet day 7 tomorrow , thinking i was unwise with the email should of just posted recorded delivery . Just a further thought , if there are two people of the same name living in a house which credit file do they trash considering there is no date of birth on the court papers.

Mailed this of to MCOL Dear Sir/Madam I am mailing you in order to assertain if i have the right to request some information under the freedom of information act. I am aware that debt collectors are abusing the court process at MCOL by bringing actions against people who reside outside of the courts jurisdiction ie N.Ireland and Scotland . . I have recently been on the recieving end of one of these fraudulently obtained CCJS myself . Therefore if permissable, i request that you provide me with a list of CCJs issued for the BT postcode with the name of the company who bought the action to the court . If it is not within your remit to authorise the release of this information , i would appreciate if you could provide me with the email address of someone who may be able to assist me in gaining the required information.