You are thinking of sanitary provisions an employer must provide

As this is an entertainment venue that accepts fee paying and non fee paying members of the public onto its land in mass, the organizers will have to provide adequate sanitary facilities. This comes under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

You need to confirm this but i would think legislation attached to the Environment agency will be applicable as well.

Your best be will be to contact the local authority Environmental health department, they will tell you the maximum number of toilets that have to be provided at any one time. The council may have its own special provisions or bye laws in this scenario

Contact the

HSE FOR A COPY OF THE EVENT SAFETY GUIDE. IT IS RECOGNIZED AS AN EVENT INDUSTRY STANDARD, IT LISTS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ON TOILET PROVISIONS AT EVENTS/FESTIVALS

So they have now agreed the extension as to CPR 15.5 have they, that is 2 days after the dead line to submit the defence to the court has passed, that is convenient (NOT). They will now have to answer the defence submitted. Time is now on our side, lets see what the postman brings from Hagarty

Get a print out of your credit file showing the welcome default, it might be under IND if not welcome, but get a print out, take up Experian on their 30 day free offer if you have to, then cancel before the 30 days are up

Make sure you do it as a VT and not a VS

Its just i have used the quote in a bibliography and i need to reference it

I am no stranger to bibliography, its just the reference details i need

Wicked

Diamond geezer

They most certainly are low-paid, just like anyone else who works but is currently entitled to WTC and who will transfer (eventually) to UC. It's just that other low paid people won't have their own colleagues cracking the whip at them.

Having the draconian attitude given to anyone is abhorrent after being a victim of it myself. But i cant help thinking of Deja vu on those benefit staff who have enjoyed their moment of power and relished inflicting misery on others.

Then reality kicked in, the front line job center benefit staff are only a fraction of people employed by the DWP, It is the staff you do not see in the back rooms that are going to suffer like every one else

I am after the current publisher

I am trying to reference a Sherlock Holmes book in a bibliography

The book is called the sign of four by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, is the truth ‘:

I am trying to find the current publisher and date as there is no ISBN number

This may take a simple email to your past employer stating that you intend submitting a claim to the Employment Tribunal Service under section 13 Employment Rights Act, unlawful deduction of wages and request they send you those documents with immediate effect. Mention you have spoken to ACAS

Ask them to make provision to collect any outstanding company property as it is unreasonable for you to comply with their request for you to return the property

I am of the opinion your past employer is being totally unreasonable

that may wake them up a bit

That is why the appeal to the supreme court is so important

It will end speculation once and for all, that is for the creditor, and borrower alike

They cannot withhold those items if your contact of employment has been officially terminated

Have they held any outstanding pay including outstanding holiday entitlement

I will keep this thread updated, seems a letter to the local authority for clarification is in order

Excellent information and I would hope that the TV company are made aware of this...

It would not surprise me if the TV production company did not know the true extent of this companies past behavior

At the end of the day these programs are no more than to titillate the viewers, Motorway Cops, Get Dom, Rogue Traders as examples

These production companies are complicit in the actions of who they portray as their only interest is in viewing figures, and selling the documentary to the main TV channels

The reality is that this company will rise like the phoenix under a different company name and new consumer credit licence

However the test for proximity would be an issue as you mention.

We are inn agreement

Under the DPA organisations are generally required to ensure that personal data they store is "accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date, such as the credit reference agencies

Credit agencies have no co-extensive common law duty of care to ensure individuals' credit data is accurate as they rely on third party accuracy

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/108.html

The Court of Appeal has allowed the appeal in Smeaton v Equifax, to cries of relief from credit reference agencies and many other handlers of complex data

http://www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ne30799

But the very act of placing a default credit marker with the credit agencies is in its self will show financial instability to any future creditor. This all seems to be about quantifying any loss suffered, not damage to indirect credit reputation

I contend that the very fact of placing a negative marker, even in error is defamatory to a persons good name and needs redress

When this is heard in the supreme court, all these anomalies will be ironed out and a decision given that all creditors and borrowers will have to abide with as it will finally give clarity

QUOTE

If successful this will strengthen the claim of anyone who wishes to make a claim as they will not have to prove specific damage

Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 AER 119

The above case proved that loss to credit reputation and general damages can be awarded with no specific loss

The fact damage to credit reputation was enough to award general damages

We might now get a final decision on this, judges in the lower courts have been holding back and playing safe until this has been decided

Thanks Unclebularia

Fingers crossed for Richard for taking on the establishment and getting it to the highest court in the land

Not bad for a Commoner

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jobless-forced-pay-library-internet-1959330#.UcAAnnUtPIo.facebook

Public library will now charge for FREE internet access

Durkin was in relation to an unlawful default on his credit file and damage to his credit reputation. He was awarded 8 k

This again has been appealed to the supreme court as this case was originally decided in the Scottish jurisdiction

If gentlemen only clubs have been deemed as unlawful

This no more than a women only club

Or am i missing something???

I have just read a thread which i can only contemplate as a travesty of natural justice

Does anybody know if Richard Durkin has had his appeal in the Supreme Court, and if not, when the appeal is being heard. This matter really does need case law to decide the issue of unlawful defaults

It is all to do with this case that was heard in Scotland

RICHARD DURKIN v. DGS RETAIL LIMITED+HFC BANK PLC, 26 March 2008, Sheriff J K Tierney

Thanks for the link

Supreme court hearing on 28th Jan 2014, according to Richard Durkins twitter feed.

A bit late in this case but at least we will have closure through case law in the new year. With that appeal, speculation and uncertainty will end once and for all

Good luck Richard

And a Scottish court, not English

But i would think that case can be referenced in any damages claim

Sorry, it was 8 k awarded. NOT 10

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/A187_04.html

121. In these circumstances and standing such a recent decision where the claims appear to have been treated as being capable of existing together, I find that the pursuer is entitled to an award for the general damage to his credit in addition to an award in respect of the actual loss flowed sustained. Having regard to all the circumstances I consider that an appropriate award would be £8,000.