Jump to content

chemicalbeavis

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by chemicalbeavis

  1. Good luck with this, i fought with BT to get some answers re, how it is calculated to no avail. Voted with my feet in the end.
  2. Tiscali are the worst company i have ever dealt with, here is the first letter i sent them which explains the situation (This went on for months until i eventually obtained a MAC and migrated to another ISP and alas! no problems! simply Tiscali's inability to provide any kind of resonable service) Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing with regard to the broadband service i currently receive from you. Since i joined your 8mb service last year i have never experienced speeds exceeding 1100kbps, and as of this moment the speed is so slow that the internet is unusable, i have conducted a comprehensive speed test and my current bandwidth is 18kbps. When i joined your service there was a delay as you told me you wanted to ensure that i will receive the best possible service of 8mb on my line despite the fact that BT had already told me my line would only be capable of 4.5mb at that time. I told you that i would be quite happy with 4.5mb but you insisted that you would enable an 8mb service for me. I have been in contact with your technical support team several times in the past to try and resolve the issue and i have followed all the steps they have advised but the problem was never resolved. I recently learnt that a neighbour of mine who is a BT Broadband customer enjoys speeds of 7-8mb, this prompted me to contact you technical support team again as i am indeed paying for such a service. My technical support request has now become a farce, i will now explain the sequence of events so far: 5th Feb: Issued support request from your online support centre. 6th Feb: Received standard reply advising the steps to perform. 6th Feb: I advised that the problem remains. 8th Feb: Received reply telling me that they are unable to assist me at this helpdesk and i should telephone Technical Support on 0870 744 2922. 9th Feb: I telephoned technical support as advised and the operative was unable to solve the problem, he told me some tests would be carried out and he took note of my mobile phone number and said i would be updated with the progress of the tests. 9th Feb (10.07am): Received text message from you telling me that the problem was being investigated. 10th Feb (10.34am): Received text message from you telling me that BT were unable to detect a fault and i would be contacted shortly. 10th Feb (10.34am): Received text message from you telling me that you have been trying to contact me. 10th Feb: I telephoned you and was told that the problem was still being investigated. 11th Feb (9.38am): Received text message from you telling me that BT were unable to detect a fault and i would be contacted shortly. 12th Feb (9.27am): Received text message from you telling me that BT have detected a fault and i would be contacted shortly to arrange an engineer visit. 13th Feb (9.35am): Received text message from you telling me that BT have detected a fault and i would be contacted shortly to arrange an engineer visit. 14th Feb (8.08am): Received text message from you telling me that BT have detected a fault and i would be contacted shortly to arrange an engineer visit. 15th Feb (8.35am) Received text message from you telling me that BT have detected a fault and i would be contacted shortly to arrange an engineer visit. 15th Feb: I telephoned technical support to find out what was going on and to inform you that my connection was now unusable. The operative said he would arrange an engineer visit. I was told that the engineer would arrive between 10.30am and 1pm on 16th February 2007. 16th Feb (8.36am): Received text message from you telling me that the fault is still being investigated by BT and i will be updated within 24 hours. 16th Feb (10.15am): BT engineer arrives and conducts tests on my line. His tests confirm that by current bandwidth is as follows, downstream: 7kbps, upstream: 458kbps. He informs me that the line is free from faults and fully operational. In the meantime i received an email from your online support informing me that as they have not heard from me concerning my request for support in the 72 hours since they sent me a response, and consequently, they have changed the status of my question to SOLVED. I replied informing them that the problem was not SOLVED and asked what would be done about it. I replied each day following this asking what would be done and i have been ignored on every occasion. This morning i have attempted to telephone your technical department three times to find out what is going on and each time they claim they cannot hear me, same with your customer service line yet if i try any other number they hear me perfectly. So, as the situation is as of now, i have an unusable internet connection despite having a fully capable telephone line. I cannot contact technical support or customer services as they claim they cannot hear me. I am still paying you for an 8mb internet connection that in reality is only a fraction of that speed and as of the last few days, is unusable. The Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 requires a supplier of a service acting in the course of business in England, Wales and Northern Ireland to carry out that service with reasonable care and skill. I do not believe your supply of service is without breach of this legislation. I telephoned you yesterday to complain about the situation and was told by your customer services operative that if i ring you on 22nd February i will be entitled to obtain a MAC without being liable for any fee with respect to incomplete contractual term which i find acceptable if not for the fact that the problem remains that i have no usable internet connection and i am now unable to contact you, and indeed that i have been paying for a service that it has become apparent, you simply cannot provide. Please advise me how you intend to resolve this sorry situation, Yours Faithfully, Simon POwell
  3. I just moved to 02 from BT in protest at their non direct debit penalty charge and it is the best move i ever made, fantasticly fast and very cheap, coudn't recommend it enough.
  4. Shouldn't BT be required to demonstrate how it's charge is calculated? It's clearly a penalty and therefore unlawful. This judgement makes the UTCCR's appear a mockery.
  5. SUCCESS! Letter recieved yesterday from Capital One confirming full repayment on a "no admission of liability basis" According to Angelina Wilson (Executive Office Manager) it is clear i have no case against Capital One and this payment is made purely as a gesture of goodwill, despite the fact that the account has been closed for 2 years
  6. Ah that's what i hoped, thanks for the info, just reading the other threads now.....
  7. Hi, First post. I have gone through all the letter stages with Capital One, recieved all the standard letters from Mr Udy and on 1st April i started a claim for £100 of charges plus interest at 8% through Moneyclaim (Didn't know i could claim contractual interest at the time). I have since recieved an Acknowlegement of Service from Northampton County Court advising me that they intend to defend all of my claim and they have 28 days in which to do so. Now i'm a little concerned as this is unchartered territory for me, i have successfully reclaimed all my other charges from other accounts before this stage. Will Capital One really defend my claim? Just wondered if anybody else has had it taken this far...
×
×
  • Create New...