Jump to content

WingedAngel19

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WingedAngel19

  1. Mum got a green wooden heart which she found painted by hand and it says: 'Loved you once love you still Always have Always will' and birds name below We just hope we didnt put pet through extra pain in our choice of agreeing to tests, when recomended they were way to go. Hoping that he didn't suffer. Rollercoaster ride.
  2. Mum got a reply with copy of admission form signed we did not have time to read, as told had to sign before could treat him There is one issue mum is dealing with, but also I noticed a statement saying payment in full is required and if pet is admitted payment in stages required for treatment also that payment in full required on picking up pet or in stages as prior mentioned and more important it states, if payment is not paid in full an administration fee of 10% will be added. Now the vet in email after tha fact tried to tell mum an admin fee of 10% of outstanding balance is required every month but the admission form we did not have time to read does not state a monthly rate, more clearly a one off charge from what I interpret. Oddly the itemised bill conflicts with what stated as it states payments not settled within 21 days is charged 5% compund interest a month. This vet whilst urgent to treat ort pet as we interpreted, should at least give us time to read what we sign. Mum was told you need to sign this for us to examin and if needed admit him, this was before he was even checked over for lumps and mum was still holding onto hope we could take him home that night with antibiotics that would cure him for suspected infection we guessed. Also the copy is not very clear signature wise, mum is finding it odd how the printed word is clear yet her signature is blurred and the first name of mum is a clear straight T on her signatures elsewhere, on the form is looks like a J. Oddly on the top of the form where the vet infront of us wrote down my mobile number along with house number as mums phone was dead he took my number for emergency, my name has been writted in blurred pen and oddly enough my name starts with a J. My mum signed for the form infront of me and to us this from is not clear enough for us to say this is the form we singed, as had no chance to read and were not given a copy. You would think any form mentioning interest risk charges would result in copy given to pet owner. Not only that but my mobile number was written on the front of the from in front of us with me there, yet on the copy my phone number is not written near my name very odd !!! At the end of the day mum said the form does not matter, in that on it is a suspected diagnosis which is not what the vet stated to us stood there in the room, it does not make sense, but this form does show a 10% charge, but more importantly does not say monthly. From this form here you cannot justify trying to add more than a one off admin fee if the vet wanted to be so lacking in compassion that they seem to forget it was them who refused the advance payment, and only took the initial examin fee. This form which feels alien to mum as again did not read or have copy does also hints that if pet is to stay in hospital which bird did, then if tests are to be done, they want payment from them in stages. Rather the reverse of what told when they refused the £400.00. Mum has said if they really did not want the money relating to treatment suggested test wise which was approximated to £400.00, then if they want to try and impose a 10% charge admin fee, surely its rather unprofessional that they refused the offer of payment in advance. Why? So on top of our bad luck in losing pet and flood, they want to kick the boot in. Mum is also confused and looking into another issue. The vet after asking what pet was normally fed and when last noticed eating normally replied to us that we seemed to be giving him a good diet. We told him pet was eating fine till few days ago and then stopped and we noticed change in droppings consistancy, which led mum to research it and rush him in. On this form it states to stabilise for anorexia and lists tests PU/PB etc... to determine cause. Mum broke down when read anorexia, which of course in humans is one thing, but after research in pets is lack of apetite, lethargy. But it does not take much research to realise that avian anorexia has to have been an ongoing condition which would have been noticed surely much much sooner. Mum has asked for results to the tests done, as she is starting to doubt the vets description that is was in his DNA as in middle aged parrot of 19, which mum said was surely too young and he had said pets diet seemed okay from what we told him. So you see if we had been given copy of this form or seen it to read on day, mum would have said, hang on what is anorexia when you are looking at ruling out swallowed something or kidney failure. Confusing !! He told us pet was seriously ill and despite looking good, due to wild birds protecting nature, they dont show illness untill seriously ill. Surely the tests done would have at least resulted in us being given a formal diagnosis, as in if it was kidney failure which would result in death, then the tests would have shown it to state to us. We got a call all positive, to then get a call he is on oxygen and give permission to put him to sleep. Mum is tearing herself apart that due to distance they made the descision to end his life rather than fight for him.... ..... We have been told kidney failure with no official results stating so, we trusted the vets word as no reason to doubt. Whilst pet is dead now we cant reverse that, I think the way they dealt with mum was unprofessional. Mum got phone call and was told he was suffereing yet fine and eating only couple of hours before. Mum is torturing herself they just decided to put him down or that he had already died earlier and they are playing her. Mum is unwell of course, but I feel had they sent her email test results/xray results she would have had foundation to justify why she was right to say yes okay put him to sleep. She is upset thinking if she had said no, perhaps he could have still bounced back or perhaps he was already dead. Mum is only having these up and down thoughts since told he was in the freezer and when explained our circumstances they took a very non compassionate attitude, after understanding we had not had chance to read form, there are concerns there in itself re the form, but mum says at least it confirms they are out of order saying will charge 10% interest every month. Vet said pet was so very ill we should prepare ourselves, if anorexia to extent he had been dying was the cause leading to organ faiure mum has said due to her research, surely it would have been kinder to put him to sleep whilst mum was there. It seems to me the vet knew pet was going to die,why were we routed to option of tests xray etc......was that fair on him. Mum said any hope would have said yes do the tests as she did, but perhaps we should have been told if suspected kidney condition due to avian anorexia, then surely there was no hope, he was dying in front of us. As we had no chance to see what we signed, we trusted or picked up there was a little hope which was worth any expense mum said. But was if fair on our pet if vet suspected what mum has researched from listed on this form...... We can only hope we did the right thing trying to fight for him... ...but feel after research withour any evidence showing it was a quick illness which destroyed his organs etc... then the alternative is more distressing. Whilst he appeard to be eating he was really very very sick and we did not know, so feel we have let him down/suffer through us not realising. Hence asked mum to ask for evidence of exactly what results showed, as we have never been told anymore than his xray was clear which was good news, but told nothing re the blood tests.....due to call to put him down. Sorry for going on, we will pay what is owed for our pet, just my compassion for the practice has dissapeard with how they treat mum. Why email saying 10% charge every month, when a one off charge is the truth from what we see on this form, even if it looks to me alien as my mobile number is not written on it that I can see. Odd eh? If vet states again mum has to pay a fee of 10% interest monthly, I am going to tell her to reduce the offered month amount inline with her finances due to lack of compassion/clarity. Pet is gone, mum will pay, but at her pace, rather than stress over and over re a vet practice who dont keep owner fairly informed or understand emergencies happen elsewhere too. Vets need their money, I can see that. Why they would refuse £400.00 from a new customer not later worthy of credit of same amount is something perhaps they might review next time dealing with similar case. If offered money in advance, take it !!
  3. Thanks I probably will in the future. It is a credit card from the early 90's, if they contact her again I will start thread as now can act on her behalf.
  4. Our Bird initial appt was £50.00+ just for feeling body to check for lumps !!!! Local vet recommended avian vet in another county as non near by. Looked at the vets reviews after using them, they are excellent rated, but noticed a comment you have to be able to afford them as expensive. Mind you our pet was worth it to us but he died anyway
  5. Mum has suggested she pay the money into their bank account, as has the details from bill once a month, but I think she needs agreement set in place first to stop the interest and look into that.
  6. A short while ago we had an emergency with our pet bird When he started to be sick we rushed to the vets and it was obvious the pet was very ill and had gone down hill quickly. Mum was asked to sign a peice of paper to give them permission to check over the bird in another room and it was signed without out time to read, but TBH it was an emergency and the last thing on our minds. Bird came back out with vet who checked it over and confirmed no visible lumps as was wanting to rule out obvious cancer and that indeed the bird was very sick. We were told a number of investigations needed to be done to try and find the cause to possibly save the bird and that it would be expensive and an estimate was quoted there and then to which mum said please do what you can. The bird had been with us for over ten years and my mum has mental health issues and we wanted to do right by our pet. Vet said the bird was so sick it needed to be put on a drip straight away and kept in over night to see if survived that, then the next step would be to x-ray under anesthetic and blood tests, so we waited hopefully for positive call step by step. Mum had emergency money saved for of considerable amount and as the quote was quite high at the till offered the full amount there and then and said any left over could be refunded or any extra added later, to which was told no, just pay the first consulation fee which without question she did. The promised evening call did not occur, but we realised vets are busy and as suspected it would be a call re pet passing waited till morning. Phone called and told us bird had survived the night and in fact was eating a little and it looked positive, phew. Next step was to take place later that day and we got the call to say pet had survived the aneasthetic and the xray was fine and bloods taken and all was positive so far,but that the bloods would give the full reason for illness. Got unxpected call then to ask for permission to put pet down, as was on emergency o2 and was suffering, which was shock compared to positive call prior, but a very sad mum gave permission and well the whole street heard her cry most likely...... We were very stressed and upset but knew pet was not suffering now, mum was struggling to deal with it and then we had issue with kitchen flooded and mum panicked and called out emergency plumber, this was all within few hours....Not a good few days. The outcome of this was the emergency money my mum had due to her panicking over the flooding, which turned out to be comming from a washing machine and mum did not know how to turn off the water, meant late plumber costs for help and repair which mum paid out in cash there and then to resolve. Mum has never had an overdraft from her bank so she approached them and requested one to help to make sure we could settle the vet bill and when told the reason for needing one, the bank refused. TBH it turned out mums account was not one that gave overdrafts anyway and mum did not realise. To get the bird to an avian specialist vet due to no transport and mums panic which was justified, we got a taxi to next county and it cost us £50 in total there and back, which at time mum had emergency money and was panicking about her bird, she has mental health issues you see which affect her actions, but have to say she was dealing with it no worse than I would have re sense of getting to nearest avian vet due to bird was exotic and rehomed by her some time ago from dead friend. The bird meant a lot to her After the plumbing issue it became obvious we would struggle to afford the taxi to pick up the birds body and they offered over the phone to deal with it and mum would ring back in few days to sort out how to pay, but I do wish they had accepted the money upfront when offered as perhaps mum having no money left would have stopped her calling out a very expensive emergency plumber due to no cash and perhaps I could have called a neighbor friend to help, but this is all after the event as I was not there and round friends house, but if there could have stopped her. Long story so far, but mum contacted the vets by their answer service re getting an itemised bill and sorting out a mutual payment plan to pay off the amount as quickly as possible. Mum heard nothing back re the two contacts via their email message service, which told them that we agreed to their offer of disposing of pet their end due to cost of taxis being problem now and that would get in touch once had itemised final bill. Phone rang and it was the woman asking what did we want doing with pet as was in the freezer. Mum screamed and broke down at description as had expected bird to have been dealt with but had had no reply. She was polite but going down hill and asked them had they read her contact emails to be told they had received both and mum asked why did they need to tell her pet was in a freezer as instructions were clear, she had to leave the phone then till gathered herself and rang back to get confirmed they would deal with bird in relation to the already confirmed request from her. Mum became very ill and even was heard asking the receptionist for them to get bird back alive again and had the pinched him or had he escaped and they just didnt want to tell her. Think she was desperately wishing he was still alive, but the trigger was told he was in a freezer. mum calmed down and awaited the bill to which she intended explaining plumbing issue along with bank told her a firm had without permission taken money out of her account, which we had to contact them to get back, but that we would pay the money albeit it by agreed payment plan. Got reply saying that they do not offer new customers payment plans and if the bill was not settled within 21 days in full that they planned to charge compound interest of 10% every month. Mum had been quite honest in her financial situation, did add if they had took the £400.00 the vet will remember was offered as down payment there and then, that it would have been paid, but that we would pay them an agreed amount but please dont charge interest as firstly not aware of any interest information re non paid in full bills. The admission form signed was not even allowing us to read it, it was sign to rush him in and worded as permission to treat and no copy was even given, that is the only thing we signed and have no clue if any interest is mentioned on there and if it is, was certainly not pointed out, we have requested a copy. Up to date mum has been holding on re her conditon and contacted them offering £40.00 a month to pay the bill and they have refused this ammount despite her stating she is on benefits. Yes she did have a rehomed exotic pet well loved, and did put money away in event of emergency, but split descision by her due to her conditon once bird was dead, meant the flood was priority at that time, she did not know even how to turn the water off and panicked, I wish I had been there. Fact is she owes the money, has received final bill and then an email inflating the cost and refusing any payment plan. I see it from both sides, the vet wants their money, but I also stood by mum offering them the £400.00 up front, as due to taxi cost of additonal £50.00 for each return journey, we had sort of expected the worst, but vet had said not unkown for pets to bounce back. Turned out bird had chronic kidney failure, was told it is in their DNA and whilst mum was pleading bird is only 19, was told quite middle aged and it does just happen due to infection or as vet said in their DNA. Bird had shown no signs prior to few poorly days, was still eating, stood on one foot, great color plumage, all the signes you know in a healthy bird. Just mum knew all of a sudden we needed to rush him to get help. She insists she can still hear him talking to her, when in fact it is probably next doors bird, and is not very well,but is under the hospital. I dont want her getting any dca threat calls as last time police arrived re an ongoing 20yr old debt she pays £1.00 a month to and mum told them if they did not leave her alone she was going to harm herself, police came to the house. We want to get the vet to hopefully accept £40.00 a month and dont charge a non understood interest which would be like a kick when down. Mum is under hospital seeing psychiatrist soon. Can a vet randomly add 10% compound interest a month when I understand they want their money, but have been told the truth and seem to show no compassion. I wish they had took her money when offered it. ps. Mum did pay the first examination fee of about £55.00 there and then and even the woman on the till said payment up front was not necessary,despite mum offered it there and then.
×
×
  • Create New...