Shaggy123
-
Posts
85 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Shaggy123
-
So is ACS law still carrying on this or have they stopped?
-
You've admitted allowing 3rd parties access to your router and had no idea what they were doing with your connection (although he may have been checking email). You should have just denied all knowledge of any one using it as this just opens you up to further questioning.
-
Depends what he wanted to use it for. I certainly wouldnt hand it out to all and sundry. I'd change the WEP key periodically too.
-
You've authorised him to use your connection, therefore it's unsecure. Authorising others to use it is just asking for trouble.
-
You've admitted yourself your mate pulled up outside and used it. More fool you if you allow others access to your network. You're just asking for trouble.
-
WEP is easy to hack if you know what you are doing and have the right tools. It's doubtful non pc savvy people could hack it. What sort of friends are yours if they are using their IT skills to hack your network?
-
It sounds to me like you havent got security enabled on your router.
-
Dear Simon Please feel free to keep clutching at straws in a vain attempt to give your cases some merit. In the meantime please take on board that it is very easy for the security recommended by the ISPs to be cracked. I know the cold hard facts are of no interest to you but I feel you have shown a lack of understanding surrounding the above process and thus a requirement to be be furnished with the above was evident. Thanks
-
I very much doubt they'll be stewing. They'll not have given it a 2nd thought. They'll have just logged who they sent letters to and will check at a later date who has replied and who hasn't and act accordingly.
-
Not if you did what they are saying.
-
It's not possible to do it accidentally.
-
I think if a judge told you to, you would.
-
Keep replying, he'll keep sending you letters. You've stated your position so ignore them now.
-
You think he'll care about your questions? You think he'll furnish you with a reply other than ignore what you've said and send another begging letter? You're not going to score points with him as he simply doesnt care. You're wasting your time replying after the 1st LOD.
-
I wouldn't even bother replying to the 2nd letter. You've stated your position and entering into dialogue with them only encourages them to continue harrassing you. A simple 1st letter of denial stating your position is all that is required unless you like wasting your own time.
-
Ah right. I'd suggest you use the quote function to avert further confusion.
-
Right. It's just that here you said you did. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-3058771.html
-
I'd suggest first of all you get your story straight. So did you phone them or not? It's difficult for people to help if they're struggling with the facts.
-
Welcome to last year.
-
There's nothing makes your pc look tampered with like a bit of disk cleaning software on it does. Sets alarm bells ringing straight away.
-
If you downloaded through torrents it you shared it and thus have uploaded it also.
-
The evidence lies with your public IP address, not your PC.
-
This is incorrect. The IP adddress they indicate is the IP address assigned to you by your ISP and as such will be your routers public address.
-
That's exactly how I've judged and played it. Provide evidence or quit sending me letters!
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS