Shaggy123
-
Posts
85 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Shaggy123
-
Thanks for your replies. Well, I've tested it to see if the video quality was up to scratch as noted above, decided it wasnt so have now sent it back. Havent gone on holiday or anything with it :)I accept that it has to be returned at my cost and thats no problem.
-
Hi. Under distance selling regulations there is a part about the customer being able to examine the goods as they would in a shop.I bought a video camera over the internet, opened it, tested it around the house for its capabilities, decided it wasnt suitable and emailed to send it back.The T&C on the website say"You can cancel your order and return it to us within 14 days of the purchase date if it is in its original condition, completely unused, and suitable for resale."If I bought it in a shop I would have tested it as I have at home yet the above appears to tell me I shouldnt have even opened it to examine and test it. So, its in its original condition (apart from the battery is charged), suitabel for resale but its not completely unused. Surely they cannot say that under DSRs?So, what i'm asking is under DSRs what does examine mean and is that an unfair term on their website if they enforce it?Thanks for any help.
-
My advice would be to read the thread and make your own mind up from the advice within it. That would be my advice to any new poster who comes and says what should I do without first reading the thread.
-
Understandably, but returning and asking the same question again a few weeks later gets a bit tiresome.
-
You're wasting your time. All Blashey does is ask the question then come back and ask the same question a few weeks later if he/she doesnt like the answer given.
-
In which case you're not really in a position to offer an informed opinion. This is why you should have read the thread before offering an ill informed opinion. ACS Law are not pretending to act for anyone. They are actually acting for clients.
-
Just as we all knew. He doesnt care one jot about the damage illegal downloading is doing to the music industry. It's all about making money.
-
First you said you downloaded it and deleted it because you didnt like it. Then you changed the story to you downloaded it then bought it. You're sticking to the second story now but either way it's irrelevant. While you were downloading you were also uploading and that's what they're interested in. Whether you own the works or not is of no consequence to them. You didnt own the works so should not have been uploading it. Either way they have an admission from you.
-
This begs the question, why have you given them your mobile number?
-
You've done it therefore you should pay. If you havent done it and admitted to doing it then you have learnt an expensive lesson.
-
By paying up she's admitted guilt. That looks far far worse.
-
I'd suggest reading whats been posted many times on this thread about what to do after a 2nd letter. TBH i'm fed up of repeating the same thing to people who wont do a bit of work themselves and read the thread.
-
It's also important to be consistent with the story. Changing the story just gives them a reason to disregard everything you say.
-
So why admit on the phone to those chasing you, and on here that you downloaded it then deleted it only to change the story later? Dont think you have a leg to stand on to be honest.
-
Dont worry, dont get upset. They've yet to take court action. Send your letter of denial (you can find details on what to put in this on this thread), stating your position and leave it at that. It's likely they'll reply saying it is an invalid reply but that's rubbish. As long as you apply the template to your circumstances then they have no comeback. As I say, send one response and leave it at that.
-
Follow what it says in the SIH, adding that if they cannot provide evidence they should desist from contacting you again and any further correspondence not offering this evidence will be ignored. One letter to them stating your position will suffice, do not get into letter tennis and do not give them any more info than you need to.
-
Well what is the true story? Did you download it then delete it because you didnt like it or did you download it, like it then buy a copy? If you cant be consistent and honest with your stories then how can anyone offer help? We dont know what to believe!
-
.......then they use the list of IP addresses theyve harvested from people downloading the tool and hammer them too?
-
Ah yes, not down as such, just certain pages not playing. A bit unprofessional that.
-
It's fine from here.
-
You stated your position in the first letter. You dont need to get into any sort of postal tennis with them. Ignore it.
-
Unsurprising. If he purchased it for ACS then he'll be the regstrant until it expires.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS