sorry cd didn`t think about free advertising you need to be impartial i know

Well guys WE DID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Perseverance and bloody minded determination on our part and expert know how and support from you guys led to our farce of a court case being dropped, by non other than HFO themselves. We were sent a bundle from them that included a very ropey cca some even ropier statements but still no proof of notice of assignment. At this stage i admit i thought we were DONE FOR!!! Despite this the marvelous solicitors being EDIT who were very kindly recommended by COLEDOG thought we had a strong case and as such HFO requested a STAY of court to delay the process to presumably menace us into settling or obtain further evidence-which naturally would have already been forthcoming if they had any access to it. In anticipation of a court stay hearing being 9th of March(last Friday-imagine my joy when I returned home to receive a letter from Turnbull stating that HFO were dropping the entire case!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In short i cannot thank The CAG enough and all of you personally involved for your support-The difference this has made to our lives is difficult to put into words and we can finally sleep easy. My message to anyone reading this thread is DONT GIVE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The essence of what these companies are trying to do is illegal regardless of wether you do or did owe money to your original lender once they have purchased the debt they have to operate in a certain lawful manner in order to obtain the money-This only is actually put to the test when they are in a court of law and my account and indeed the many others on this site prove that every method they implement up to court date is unacceptable, menacing and bullying AND MOST IMPORTANTLY UNLAWFUL-PLEASE DON`T GIVE IN TO THEM AND TAKE HEED OF THE CAG ADVICE AND FOLLOW THEIR PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES. If you do need specific legal assistance then i cannot recommend EDIT. He was so helpful, friendly and took the time to really make the difference. We received legal advice that not only didn`t cost us a penny i`m sure made the difference in the case being dropped. That said rest assured had we have gone to court I would have had no hesitation in employing the firm to represent us at the risk of cost to ourselves. CAG we will be a donation winging its way to you-there isn`t enough money in the world to express our sincerest thanks(although some of you may argue that point!!!) Peace of mind is everything!!!!!!!!!!!! HFO 0 GAMMON 1 YIPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sorry for confusion-working on behalf of a friend-same computer-i also use cag and have quarell with HFO at mo!!!!

October 2006

ok good advice just don`t want this to escalate to court or CCJ heaven forbid

NO idea when as can`t remember what for- if for arguments sake i was to settle, will this still drop off in August this year(date of default 2006)

Hi all waiting for response from recommended solicitors now in relation to our case. In the meantime upon checking credit file have noticed that HFO have duplicated a credit agreement. Up until recently there was only one record but since this escalated to court they have added another in Dec 2011 after we received court papers. The amounts are all the same as are start and default dates. The only difference being the dates that the file is updated-one being Sept 2011 and the second being Dec 2011. The concern is that although there is only one alleged debt there are two different reference numbers one at the top of each entry. Surely all that should of been done was the date that the file was amended should of been updated. Surely to all intent and purposes this looks to any potential lender that there are TWO agreements not ONE which is blatently wrong and has yet another detrimental impact/ Has anyone else experienced this and are they allowed to do this as this just seems to get worse and worse HELP PLEASE.............................................

more than willing to accept advice donkey you guys know far more than me and for that i am very grateful, at the time of defence submital i could only work with what i had been given and was not comfortable missing court deadline.

No on all counts, barclaycard replied to sar with no information held on me for address that i provided. i think witness statement is next step and is what i need advice about please

notice of allocation advising claim date received requesting supporting docs for defence and witness statements etc

whats a ws-just getting info you requested-sent best defence pos no option intimescales given didnt want to submit late to court

Hi all, despite our best efforts court date has arrived for beginning of March for small claims track need some real help now as out of depth-need to get all docs to court by end of Feb-they have dropped all interest so amount if just under £5k from £7.5k.Still absolutely gutted and advice greatly welcomed..........................

hi , i have received an N150 from Northampton cc , and a N149 from TR . There defence to counterclaim states that ,1 in the absence of fully particularised counterclaim , the claimant is unable to establish the case it has to meet and provide any form of defence , 2 the defendant is labouring under the misapprehension that he is required to issue a counterclaim based upon his request to defend himself against the claim for monies due under the regulated credit ageement .

hi , have now recieved court allocation questionnaire from northampton county court and have also received an allocation questionnaire and defence to counterclaim from TR . In section G of there questionnaire ( other information ) the amount they are now claiming has dropped by a considerable amount as it states that all interest that they were originally claiming is now to be disregarded and as a result the claim should now be allocated to the small claims track . Advice for next steps please .

hi , have now recieved court allocation questionnaire from northampton county court and have also received an allocation questionnaire and defence to counterclaim from TR . In section G of there questionnaire ( other information ) the amount they are now claiming has dropped by a considerable amount as it states that all interest that they were originally claiming is now to be disregarded and as a result the claim should now be allocated to the small claims track . Advice for next steps please .