danny:boy
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
6 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
1 Neutral-
bbc news has picked up on this case again BBC News - Court questions net pirate hunt
- 4,617 replies
-
- acs
- andrew cossley
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
template LOD 1 in post now just in time for the 21 day deadline lets see what happens now.
- 4,617 replies
-
- acs
- andrew cossley
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
ACS:LAW Andrew J Crossley 20 Hanover Sq, London, W1S 1JY todays date RE: Letter of Claim Dated (insert date) concerning “insert file in question as mentioned in the letter” (“The Work”) Dear Sir, I am writing in reply to your letter of claim dated (insert date) stating that my connection was used in an infringement of copyright, using peer to peer networks which allegedly occurred on the date (insert date) and concerns the work “insert file in question as mentioned in the letter” (“the work”). You assert in your letter that the infringement was apparently traced to my internet connection. I note that I am not personally being accused of the infringement, as you have no evidence to this effect. Nevertheless, I categorically deny any offence under sections 16(1) (d) and 20 of the CDPA 1988. I have never possessed a copy of the work in any form, nor have I distributed it, nor have I authorised anyone else to distribute it using my internet connection. I note that section 16(2) of the act requires a person to either directly infringe copyright, or authorise someone else to do so. I have done neither, and you have not provided any evidence of my doing so. As such I cannot and will not sign the undertakings as provided by you. As you seem to be perfectly aware, it is impossible to link an IP address to a particular person or computer without further detailed analysis, which requires a level of expertise I do not possess. Furthermore the delay in your sending of a letter of claim precludes any such analysis. In your letter you state that “it is unlikely that a simple denial (without further explanation) will change our view of the circumstances”, unfortunately I do not have the expertise to provide a detailed explanation. As such I can only conclude that I have been a victim of foul play. As far as I am aware, there is no law in the UK under which you could properly hold me responsible for an infringement occurring via my internet connection, without either my knowledge or permission. I would be interested to hear your legal basis for attempting to do so. Please inform your clients that if they wish to pursue this matter, I will seek to recover all my costs to the maximum permitted by the Civil Procedure Rules. The signature of the undersigned confirms the statement provided to be accurate and legally binding under the terms required by pre-action protocol in civil law. Yours Faithfully Your name is this the one you mean does everything look ok with it thanks dan
- 4,617 replies
-
- acs
- andrew cossley
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
has anybody got a copy of the letter of denial they can send me please thanks dan
- 4,617 replies
-
- acs
- andrew cossley
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
im aproching the 21 day dead line to reply back to the first letter, do i reply or just leave it and save wasting my time writing a letter to this idiot.
- 4,617 replies
-
- acs
- andrew cossley
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
also got the same letter evacuate the dance floor isp is also sky
- 4,617 replies
-
- acs
- andrew cossley
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.