..Oi! Nappynuts, that's the best you could come up with? did you actually go to law school?, or was Noddy's School of Law closed for the semester. you have got to be sh**'in me, that's an 'absolute answer', you need to get your nappybutt into gear, and come up with a real legal argument for non-disclosure..either that or wait til Noddy gets back from Toyland! ...edutainment. ITGG! Furian

can you expand on this, as your argument is not really a catch22, but a circular one? ITGG!

if the LIP had the deed of charge registered in the name of the SPV, then why would the LIP need to apply for disclosure??? ITGG!

what sort of evidence would be sufficient to get the LIP the MSA, to be disclosed??? ITGG!

whats the difference between 31.6 and 31.12?, can you say precisely, if the court would not order under 31.6, then why would they order under 31.12?? ITGG!

don't understand, you say the LIP cannot get disclosure under 31.6(b) , then how can a LIP get it under 31.12? ITGG!

waiting for answer. ITGG!

correct. ITGG!

fine. under CPR 31.6(b) the MSA supports the LIP and adversely affects the lender, correct? and to what degree in repossession proceedings? ITGG!

..or right game on. without Super... assuming it is an LIPs belief that the lender sold with an 'absolute assignment' the LIP mortgage to the SPV, through a true sale securitisation. under CPR 31.6 (a) &(b)i why cannot the LIP get disclosure? open to others now live on this thread ITGG!

..THEN ANSWER THE FECK'IN QUESTION! ITGG! man up

TO END ALL QUESTIONS, I OPENLY CHALLENGE ANYBODY TO PROVIDE ABSOLUTE ANSWERS TO, WHY THE MORTGAGE SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LENDER AND THE SPV; NEED NOT UNDER CPR 31.6, BE PRODUCED TO EITHER THE LIP OR THE COURT. ANSWER THIS, AND I WILL LEAVE THIS THREAD PERMANENTLY. No doubt someone, can put one of those vote meters up, so all the posters on this thread can vote on the answer. Can it done? ITGG! GAME OVER EJECT JACKAL.

save the gerbils. ITGG!

..looks like i'm not going to get that CAG record deal afterall? ITGG! aka rob van winkle

..YO! cagbot...i'm being stalked! everytime i post, i'm bloody 'radaaaaaaaaard'. please help me, i'm so lonley i need attention. BTW, why don't you and your other ****buddies, SHILL,H8THEM,CAGGER80,WUF go fel**in somewhere else, rasclat. ITGG! 187

[quote=I'm the bad guy?;2702968 1. Section 503 Companies Act 2006/section 236 Companies Act 1985, unsigned auditors report of SPML 2007. CA 1985 repealed in full on 1st October 2009. This is in reply to Nappynuts, for sake of confusion, comments on this matter were made under the recent Companies Act 2006 s.503. But from the above, s236 of CA 1985 was listed. Particular reference should be made to section 5 of 236(applicable), where a 'corporate body' is the auditor and the definition of 'signature'. "i'm N.A.P.P.Y., i'm N.A.P.P.Y i'm sure i am, i know i am I'm N.A.P.P.Y.N.U.T.S." ITGG! respect tha vets

..anybody who does not disclose the Mortgage Sale Agreement in court, is a feck'in Jackal.. ITGG! decypha M.C.

..radio rental-going mental.. throw'in shapes at the Hacienda, masssssssssive!!! ITGG! glory days

...Cool, ’cause I don’t get upset I kick a hole in the speaker, pull the plug, then I jet Back to the lab ...without a mic to grab So then I add all the rhymes I had... ITGG! fiend

"Nappy talk, keep talkin' Nappy talk, Talk about things you'd like to do. You got to have a dream, If you don't have a dream, How you gonna have a dream come true?" Dedicated to the men & women who fought & lost in JAW WARS ITGG! coming soon.. check local listings

ITGG!..who tha hell do yer' think you are cagger?! i outta CAG martial yer' ass you know the rules of engagement- don't feck'in break'em! ITBG? sorted (but not for e's & whizz)

vulture funds etc, using 3rd party FSA licensed companies, Capstone, HML, Vertex etc. this concern has been posted up previously by TSC.. ITBG?

midge61, can I ask who your JAW lender is? as some SPVs will have bought from other JAWs, here it looks like just SPML. ITBG?

..WUF...do you have some Jackal word search radar..or something?! sorry shill don't do drugs. ITGG! incoming!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

..anybody who believes that the SPVs, donot legally own your mortgage, is a feck'in Jackal.... ITGG! get some