Jump to content

dck321

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dck321

  1. Hi happy new year!

     

    The courts / natwest accepted the £80 per month payment which I have been adhering to, I rang to make my 1st payment 2nd jan 2014 (as had to be paid jan 4th ) after taking payment I was told they would be applying to court to put a charge on the house! Is this possible as I have not missed a payment in years and court agreed to this amount, and if yes how can I fight this before a decision is made?

     

    Thanks in advance

     

    Dck321

  2. letter says

     

     

    UPON HEARING THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE CLAIMANT, THE DEFENDANT NOT ATTENDING

     

     

    IT IS ORDERED THAT

     

     

    1 DEFENCE BE STRUCK OUT PURSUANT TO CPR 3.4(2)

    2 JUDGEMENT FOR CLAIMANT IN THE SUM OF 10595.50

    3 DEFENDANT TO PAY THE COSTS OF THIS APPLICATION ASSESED IN THE SUM OF £1396 TO INCLUDE ALL COURT FEES AND COSTS ENDORSED ON SUMMONS

    4 ALL SUMS TO BE PAID IN 28 DAYS

     

     

    I ONLY GOT THE LETTER THIS WEDNESDAY!!!!!!

  3. is this ok??

    – You have entered a defence

    – You stand by your defence

    – The claimant has admitted on the phone that they litigated because they claim you had not completed an I&E (you were not asked to, nor sent one), and the claimant did not follow pre-action protocols

    – You have continued with the agreed payments which may bring rise to estoppellink3.gif

    – The claimant asked the court for time to narrow the issues, but you have received no contact from the claimant about the supposed ‘issues’, and neither has the court

    – You are prejudiced because you want your defence to be heard in a court

    – The claimant is acting unreasonably in there requests

    In the light of the above, I oppose the claimants request for the defendants case to be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4 and / or that the claimant be granted summary judgement pursuant to CPR 24.2 , and respectfully ask that the court denies these requests from the claimant.

  4. The claimant seeks an order from the court that the defendants defence be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4 and / or that the claimant be granted summary judgement pursuant to cpr24.2, in terms of the draft order atatched, against the defendant because the defendants defence discloses no reasonable grounds for defending the claim and or he has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial.

     

    Can somebody help me with a witness statement as I am completely like a fish out of water now.

     

    Luckily the count court is 5 mins from me.

     

    I rang and have until 4pm to submit

  5. This is the order from shoosmiths:

     

    The claimant seeks an order from the court that the defendants defence be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4 and / or that the claimant be granted summary judgement pursuant to cpr24.2, in terms of the draft order atatched, against the defendant because the defendants defence discloses no reasonable grounds for defending the claim and or he has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial.

     

    Can somebody help me with a witness statement as I am completely like a fish out of water now.

     

    Luckily the count court is 5 mins from me.

     

    I rang and have until 4pm to submit

×
×
  • Create New...