Jump to content

dck321

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dck321

  1. Hi Yes the house is jointly owned, my half may maybe just cover the amount of the debt. And we have 3 dependant children Can I write a letter to the court beforehand or do I just have to wait for a decision? Thanks
  2. Hi happy new year! The courts / natwest accepted the £80 per month payment which I have been adhering to, I rang to make my 1st payment 2nd jan 2014 (as had to be paid jan 4th ) after taking payment I was told they would be applying to court to put a charge on the house! Is this possible as I have not missed a payment in years and court agreed to this amount, and if yes how can I fight this before a decision is made? Thanks in advance Dck321
  3. Hi have just downloaded form my partner has been paying the £80 a month as i could not afford that much as we have 4 kids, do you think i should put what i personally can actually afford ( it will be less than £80) or just stick to these payments. Thanks in advance
  4. hi my file uploader still says I am over my quota by 8.40mb
  5. Hi Any advice to my next move would be appreciated as tetter states payment to be received by tomorrow Thanks in advance
  6. hi I still cant send it come up with an explanation mark in a red circle and says 56.08mb of 47.68mb used
  7. Hi I have hand written all the full details of both letters as I only have 8kb space left
  8. Do i need to put in an i and e form to the courts or ring shoosmiths as im obviously panicking that baliffs will come to the house, all through this dispute i have still been paying the agreed £80 per month
  9. The other letter says it is adjudged that the claimant recover against the defendant the sum of 10595.50 for debt and intrest to date of judgement and 1396.00 for costs amounting together to the sum of 11,991.50 it is ordered that the defendant pay to the claimant the sum of 11991.50 on or before 12 nov 2013
  10. letter says UPON HEARING THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE CLAIMANT, THE DEFENDANT NOT ATTENDING IT IS ORDERED THAT 1 DEFENCE BE STRUCK OUT PURSUANT TO CPR 3.4(2) 2 JUDGEMENT FOR CLAIMANT IN THE SUM OF 10595.50 3 DEFENDANT TO PAY THE COSTS OF THIS APPLICATION ASSESED IN THE SUM OF £1396 TO INCLUDE ALL COURT FEES AND COSTS ENDORSED ON SUMMONS 4 ALL SUMS TO BE PAID IN 28 DAYS I ONLY GOT THE LETTER THIS WEDNESDAY!!!!!!
  11. hi it says hearing for the claimants application for defendants defence to be struck out will take place at 11.45am on the 15th October 2013 but I thought because I opposed in writing I would have been contacted to see if it was still going ahead
  12. I will check, all letters I forwarded on this site! is there any other way I can send these letters
  13. hi am trying to send the files with the letters but it says I have reached my quota so cannot send
  14. hi all looks like its all over only received these letters Wednesday, both came together in same envelope. wasn't aware I had to go to court as I had put in my letter!!! obviously do not have the funds to pay any advice would be welcomed?
  15. is this ok?? – You have entered a defence – You stand by your defence – The claimant has admitted on the phone that they litigated because they claim you had not completed an I&E (you were not asked to, nor sent one), and the claimant did not follow pre-action protocols – You have continued with the agreed payments which may bring rise to estoppel – The claimant asked the court for time to narrow the issues, but you have received no contact from the claimant about the supposed ‘issues’, and neither has the court – You are prejudiced because you want your defence to be heard in a court – The claimant is acting unreasonably in there requests In the light of the above, I oppose the claimants request for the defendants case to be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4 and / or that the claimant be granted summary judgement pursuant to CPR 24.2 , and respectfully ask that the court denies these requests from the claimant.
  16. The claimant seeks an order from the court that the defendants defence be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4 and / or that the claimant be granted summary judgement pursuant to cpr24.2, in terms of the draft order atatched, against the defendant because the defendants defence discloses no reasonable grounds for defending the claim and or he has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial. Can somebody help me with a witness statement as I am completely like a fish out of water now. Luckily the count court is 5 mins from me. I rang and have until 4pm to submit
  17. This is the order from shoosmiths: The claimant seeks an order from the court that the defendants defence be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4 and / or that the claimant be granted summary judgement pursuant to cpr24.2, in terms of the draft order atatched, against the defendant because the defendants defence discloses no reasonable grounds for defending the claim and or he has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at trial. Can somebody help me with a witness statement as I am completely like a fish out of water now. Luckily the count court is 5 mins from me. I rang and have until 4pm to submit
  18. should ny witness statement be the same as before or different
×
×
  • Create New...