F18
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
53 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by F18
-
Well it is roughly the same as the one in the thread below post number 33, just without the Annex 1 FI Exempt Circumstances & Letter to SRA since they don't say anything about solicitors' costs in the LBF i received. Dear Will & John, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim. I rolled around on the floor in mirth at the idea you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and cough up! Now you know and I know and now you know that I know the million reasons why your client's invoice is total pants. Annex 1. FI. Exempt Circumstances. Get off your backsides and do some due diligence for once and look it up. On top of that your greedy client has invented £70 Unicorn Food Tax and you've been telling porkies about solicitors' costs again. Letter to the SRA in the post! Your client can either stop this foolishness or I will look forward to thrashing them in court, obtaining an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spending it all on a nice foreign holiday while laughing at your client's expense. I look forward to your defeating silence. COPIED TO PREMIER PARK LTD"
-
Oh yes so it is. My snotty letter is thus: Thanks for your Letter Before Claim. There is absolutely no point in you pursuing this and I suspect you know that. Your client’s invoice is total farce and there are a million reasons why it will never stand up in court. Your client can either stop this foolishness or I will look forward to thrashing them in court, and obtaining an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). Please stop wasting everybody’s time. COPIED TO MET Parking Services Ltd. Sufficient? Or should I add all reasons why it's total farce, including photographic evidence of the location in question?
-
Well, the LOC arrived today from debt collection agency CST law. The top line message is "pay within the next 30 days or court action may commence". Given it's a private "fine", might I ask for advice on what I should do next? There is a part of me that is concerned they have "evidence" to genuinely back up their claim that their "client is satisfied that it has sufficient evidence to the support this claim"...
-
Thanks - ok I’ve read the long thread and have the PAP reply form downloaded and ready to be filled once I get the LOC, which I assume is a given now in prob another months time or so. At that point I’ll pop back to check I’ve done it correctly. When it comes to stating the reason for my dispute, that would be lack of signage and the fact I went to Burger King to eat, I suppose?
-
One thing I’m concerned about: what if I move home next year and they decide to send a LOC in, say, 3 years - will they track wherever my car is registered and send letters to the new address or will I likely not receive it? What happens in the latter case? Also what happens if I sell my car before a LOC?
-
Another letter today - see attached. I think this is also like the previous ones and NOT a letter of claim, correct? Today by chance I was driving past and went to take photos - the area I parked in was not covered by signage that was elsewhere, and I took photos. There’s no way the cameras could have known where I parked after entering. Could have been any of the areas not covered by signage! (And it was) PAY NOW To speak to Payment Tel. No. the (247) collections team 0208 234 6775.pdf
-
Hello - after being away for the summer I’ve returned to three letters. Dated 5 July, second one 27 July and last one 15 august threatening legal action. The latest one gives me seven days which have elapsed as I only returned home today. Please see attached - what advice would be given at this stage? Thank you in advance! And the latest one attached letters.pdf
-
1 Date of the infringement 8 may 2022 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 12 may 2022 3 Date received 12 may 2022 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] NO 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? YES BUT ONLY OF ROUNDABOUT ENTRANCE TO SERVICES AREA AND EXIT, no photos of vehicle at the services centre 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] NO Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up NO 7 Who is the parking company? MET PARKING SERVICES 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] BP Blue Boys Tonbridge, TN12 7HE For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA ................... Thank you all for your quick advices and help, and also for redacting extra parts of the pdf! Yes for the street view images, they seem to be from about 5 years ago so signage might be different now but I can’t really recall anything obvious - would have to drive all the way back. My understanding is the best thing to do is nothing, right?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.