Jump to content

workingknines

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by workingknines

  1. Good morning.

    Well was in court yesterday with WFSL.

    Judgement went in favour of the claimant.

    The claimant set out there reasons for bringing the claim against me.

    I was then allowed to speak I pointed out to the judge the paperwork in regards to the charge for Mech Breakdown insurance paperwork which,

    clearly states NOT APPLICABLE he acknowledged that and asked WFSL to explain his eplanation was flimsy at best typing error /mistake etc etc.

    Judge then looked at statement of price he commented that I had signed the agreement that clearly states I will pay x amount on x day this figure included the monthly charge for mech breakdown,

    so he would not allow it despite evidence to the contray.

    However S69 cc interest was deducted on price of ppi even though the judge was a bit baffled as to why this had been refunded by the FSCS an not the claimant.

    Judge also not happy with WFSL adding the 8% court interest before judgement being given as commented on earlier in post by DX therefore he set this at the bank of England base rate of 0.05% from the default date on account till yesterday.

    So there we go.

    Not entirely sure what happens next ref payments etc

    Many thanks

    WK

  2. Quick update not sure if I have mentioned this although I have looked through thread.

     

     

    When I received my SAR from welcome finance after checking countless times I came across some paper work they had enclosed.

     

    This relates to Mechanical Breakdown Recovery

    underneath this it states in bold type Not applicable

    however I have been charged £503.00 incl of interest.

     

    I have included this in my witness statement to the court and a copy to IND.

     

    Is this likely to render the agreement unenforceable?.

     

    Getting rather anxious as date is looming.

     

    Many thanks

     

    WK

  3. Update on post.

     

    Evening.

     

    Welcome finance via the FSCS have settled my claim for mii-sold ppi

    it has been deducted from the balance they are claiming at court and have notified them.

     

    However what they have not done is recalculated interest under section 69 of the county court act.

     

    Surely they are obliged to to do this as they have admitted miss-selling.

     

    Also the FSCS have sent me more paper work in order to claim all other rubbish stuck on account at conception

    after I sent letter of complaint to welcome head office

  4. Morning Update on thread.

     

     

    After sending letter of complaint to welcome finance ref additional insurance policies added to a car loan.

    Received letter back from welcome stating welcome in default etc etc negotions on going with FSCS to allow customers to claim back these premiums in the near future.

     

     

    Also received a witness statement from IND ltd from an external account manager with documents/evidence they intend to rely on in court.

    something I have noticed on this gap insurance is listed on credit agreement however on the breakdown of charges for insurances it is listed as shortfall extra ??

     

     

    I have received no such direction from the local court regarding a witness statement as was clearly advised to wait for court direction.

    Many Thanks

     

     

    WK

  5. Good morning.

    Update so far.

     

     

    Have a court date of 24th March,i have also asked for the free mediation service which has not happened as of yet.

     

     

    Welcome finance via the FSCS have awarded me my ppi claim against welcome this will come of the balance they are claiming at court.

    Regarding the Gap insurance shortfall collision call emergency recovery and mechanicial breakdown insurance that was front loaded who do I complain to welcome finance or welcome via the FSCS.

     

     

    Reason why I ask is I have spoken to the FSCS and they are saying two different things

    I am on a list an when the system goes live ??? they will send me the claim form which I have been told is different to the ppi form.

     

     

    Other story is should have received it by now.

     

     

    Any advice much appreciated

     

     

    WK

  6. Good afternoon.

     

     

    Received letter from Northampton bulk centre stating case has been transferred to my local court.

    Prior to this they sent an allocation questionnaire to myself stating it must be returned no later than the

    6th of December,which is was Iit stated that a copy must be sent to all parties concerned.which it was.

     

     

    Howver unsure if welcome have to send me one if so I have not received it,can anybody shed any light on this please.

     

     

    Thanks

    WK

  7. Hi

     

    Took out a car loan with British credit trust in 2007,this was arranged by Net cars ltd(formerly net vehicles solutions ltd.

     

    The vehicle loan is now paid in full since 2011.

     

    At beginning of 2013 I instructed a ppi claim company to deal with(Don't do it)

     

    I called them several days ago and got a letter in post saying they are unable to continue my claim as the FSCS have stated that Net cars ltd were no regulated at the point of sale.

     

    Any ideas where I go from here,will I still be able to make any time of claim.

     

    Thanks in advance.

     

    WK

  8. Have not requested any info from IND.

    Claim form only states welcome as claimant and hegarty as solicitor,s

    Remaining balance on this account is purely insurance charges ppi gap emergency recovery etc etc.

     

    I think it is totally disgusting these people can take you to court for money outstanding that was as far as I am concerned added to the account fraudulently therefore illegally

     

    Cheers

     

    WK

  9. Good morning'

     

    Well update time received a letter yesterday from IND LTD,stating the claimant does not accept my

    defence/part admission

     

    Therefore they would like the case transferred to my local county court in order to proceed to TRIAL.

    Any thoughts ideas or advice as to what happens next would be most helpful.

     

    If IND are a DCA why are they writing to me and passing on letters from welcome finance who are the claimant as stated on original papers received from court

  10. Thanks for prompt reply.

     

    Purely states a date then says letter then a £10.00 charge.

     

    Anyhow as things stand now I had to put in my defense by 16.00 today.

     

    So have gone with section 77a of the cca as I can honestly say no such statements ever received other wise I would have noticed all the insurance that was piled on to account.

     

    So will have to wait an see.

     

    regards

    WK

×
×
  • Create New...