Jump to content

Ho Chi Min

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Ho Chi Min

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi, and thanks dx100uk for opening the thread Well another year passed and another letter has arrived. Just to recap the CCG is now 12 years old and for the first 6+ years I heard not a peep from these guys. Then in 2017 they suddenly popped up having realised they might have missed the boat. I have diligently refused to discuss this with them despite various threats. The latest arrived today and takes the form of a threat to seek an attachment of earnings order. So I think I know what the answer you guys will give, but I'd just like
  2. Yet another letter arrived today, this time from Engage (part of Marston) I will as always ignore this one too, although I do like the referrence to a CCJ having been obtained. Yes, it was 11 years ago. But before I go I'd like to run something past the wise and sage on CAG. It's now 11 years this month since they got the CCJ. They did nothing with it in terms of enforcement, I suspect because they mistakenly thought they had a charging order. Now they could go back to the court and ask for permission to enforce the CCJ but would have t
  3. Thanks Bank Fodder Well, MCE/Mortimer have popped up again for their 2 yearly round of banter. This time they are threatening to send Marstons round to visit me. I'm planning on sending a letter rescinding any express or implied permission to enter my property. Does anyone have any comments or further suggestions. Thanks as always.
  4. It wasn't backdoor I defended it but had a somewhat biased Deputy District Judge. They then went on to get a charging order but the Judge at that hearing was more on the ball and made it clear that certain conditions around who owned what % of the house needed to be sorted before the order could be enforced. We own the house as tenants in common so the charging order is only on my share of the equity, whatever that is as it could easily be 0% up to a max of 50%. There is evidence in wills made at that time that we intended my equity share to be 0%. That was the last
  5. Thanks Gents I shall await the thoughts of the Elders. If you dont mind I'd rather not disclose more at this time.
  6. Hi In short:- CCJ Granted. No contact for 9 years then I get a letter asking me to kindly call them to discuss payment. Does section 24 of the Limitations Act cover this? Does the creditior need Court permission to enforce? Would a Court be inclined to grant such an order? Thoughts much appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...