Jump to content

vix2000

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vix2000

  1. Thanks for pm. Get a bit confused, as First Direct are part of HSBC so may be in the same thread, but RBS and BOS are in the same section, although BOS part of Halifax and not related to RBS at all, and I know it makes it difficult for you when people post in the wrong place.

     

    Can you give me some advice on how to follow up from the above letter if we hear nothing, please? I believe one of the moderators has had experience with First Direct before and any help/advice would be gratefully recieved. Thanks.

  2. Thanks for pm. Get a bit confused, as First Direct are part of HSBC so may be in the same thread, but RBS and BOS are in the same section, although BOS part of Halifax and not related to RBS at all, and I know it makes it difficult for you when people post in the wrong place.

     

    Can you give me some advice on how to follow up from the above letter if we hear nothing, please? I believe one of the moderators has had experience with First Direct before and any help/advice would be gratefully recieved. Thanks.

  3. Thanks Bankfodder

     

    This is the letter we sent. We gave them 14 days but have had no reply. If we don't do what we threatened in the letter surely they'll think we don't mean it? Why wouldn't they reply?

     

    Customer Relations Manager

    FIRST DIRECT

    40 Wakefield Road

    Leeds

    LS98 1FD

     

    Wednesday, 22 February 2006

     

     

     

    WITHOUT PREDJUDICE

     

    Dear Sir,

     

    ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxx

    I have held the above mentioned current account with your bank for the past 16 months. During this time I have incurred charges of £1136.50 for exceeding my overdraft limit due to cheques being cleared at unfortunate times, unauthorized overdraft fees, direct debits and standing orders being dishonoured (and in some cases honoured) due to insufficient funds.

     

    It is my opinion, and that of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), that these charges are punitive in nature, not a genuine pre-estimate of cost and not intended to re-imburse your losses for a breach of contract occurring. Further to the 1999 Consumer Credit Regulations quoted by the OFT, there are numerous cases in law that prove that punitive charges in contracts are unenforceable at English law.

     

    Murray v Leisureplay (2004)

    Dunlop Tyre Company v New Garage and Motor Co. (1915)

    Bridge v. Campbell Discount Co. Ltd. (1962)

     

    There are many more cases of this type, far more than I have room to list here.

     

    Further to these cases, I also believe these charges to be a direct breach of the 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act which require that contract terms be reasonable. I do not believe these charges are reasonable as outlined in the aforementioned act.

     

    With this in mind, I respectfully request that you return to me ALL charges of £1136.50 made on this account in the last 16 months plus £50.13 being 8% APR as allowed by the County Courts Act (1984), within 14 days of receipt of this letter by way of personal cheque. If you choose not to do so, I will start proceedings for recovery in the County Courts, as I believe that legally I am entitled to this money back. By doing so, you will be eligible for my court costs. This money would be used in some way to clear my overdraft on this account.

     

    Yours faithfully,

  4. Thanks Bankfodder

     

    This is the letter we sent. We gave them 14 days but have had no reply. If we don't do what we threatened in the letter surely they'll think we don't mean it? Why wouldn't they reply?

     

    Customer Relations Manager

    FIRST DIRECT

    40 Wakefield Road

    Leeds

    LS98 1FD

     

    Wednesday, 22 February 2006

     

     

     

    WITHOUT PREDJUDICE

     

    Dear Sir,

     

    ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxx

    I have held the above mentioned current account with your bank for the past 16 months. During this time I have incurred charges of £1136.50 for exceeding my overdraft limit due to cheques being cleared at unfortunate times, unauthorized overdraft fees, direct debits and standing orders being dishonoured (and in some cases honoured) due to insufficient funds.

     

    It is my opinion, and that of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), that these charges are punitive in nature, not a genuine pre-estimate of cost and not intended to re-imburse your losses for a breach of contract occurring. Further to the 1999 Consumer Credit Regulations quoted by the OFT, there are numerous cases in law that prove that punitive charges in contracts are unenforceable at English law.

     

    Murray v Leisureplay (2004)

    Dunlop Tyre Company v New Garage and Motor Co. (1915)

    Bridge v. Campbell Discount Co. Ltd. (1962)

     

    There are many more cases of this type, far more than I have room to list here.

     

    Further to these cases, I also believe these charges to be a direct breach of the 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act which require that contract terms be reasonable. I do not believe these charges are reasonable as outlined in the aforementioned act.

     

    With this in mind, I respectfully request that you return to me ALL charges of £1136.50 made on this account in the last 16 months plus £50.13 being 8% APR as allowed by the County Courts Act (1984), within 14 days of receipt of this letter by way of personal cheque. If you choose not to do so, I will start proceedings for recovery in the County Courts, as I believe that legally I am entitled to this money back. By doing so, you will be eligible for my court costs. This money would be used in some way to clear my overdraft on this account.

     

    Yours faithfully,

×
×
  • Create New...