i have put up on here all my contract states as hours though i have two other letters as a result of my talks with management that both confirm a minimum 30 hours promised in my contract and that the paragraph beginning with the words "in addition" is the contracts clause on overtime hours.

my contract states HOURS OF CONTRACT your contracual hours will be 30 hours per week monday to friday/over seven days, if necessary. you will be entitled to an unpaid break of 30 minutes each day. this break is to be taken to fit in with the requirements of the business. in addition, you may be from time to time be required to be flexible with your working hours as requested which may include working outside those stated above............ I cannot see the added section can be classed as an official contractual section explaining overtime hours, conditions and pay as it is missing all these and a proper heading.

my employer contracts me to a minimum 30 hours, then doesn't provide me with 30 hours work resulting in my wages being less than 30 hours, he sometimes tells me not to bother coming in at all resulting in me having to use my holiday entitlement to make up my wages to 30 hours, can he do this, i thought the employment contracting laws in England states that if he contracts me to a minimum 30 hours in my contract that he must provide me with 30 hours or pay me the 30 hours contract minimum?????

whenever there has been less than 30 hours i have only been paid for these hours, if i work 20 hours i am only paid for 20 hours even though i have written confirmation that my employer has promised at least 30 hours,this has happened over and over, where my line manager has never been paid less than 30 hours nor has he ever been made to work over these hours and has a constant pay of 30 hours only, i have a letter from my employer to be signed and returned to him no later than the beginning of my meeting for the other matters as an agreement to change the terms of my contract as all contractual agreements for hours so far have been only what he "remembers" being said at my initial interview, not what was actually said or agreed to, can i take this as part proof in intimidation and having the paid proof of breach of contract???????, please reply???

i have worked for this employer for 16 months now

overtime hours are very sporadic, most weeks, i am lucky to scrape 30 hours and on many occasions haven't and have been paid only the hours i worked, on one occasion this being only 4.5 hours i was paid for a week, which seems like a breach of contract to me so i have been very hesitant to go all out for my employer now as soon as a large contract comes in and i am expected to work all hours while my employer and line manager usually sit at home

the company is a small one with only myself, my line manager and the company manager as workers

not wearing correct uniform even though my line manager and manager don't, taking what the manager considers to be too long on jobs even though i am still faster than my line manager, taking too long on a job because i am the only one that follows correct safety proceedures, and being told my standards have dropped for one t that was not crossed several days ago

my employer has contracted my hours to at least 30 a week, i am told this is so all he has to pay on holiday pay is 30 hours, at my interview he mention flexible hours mentioning that sometimes more than a 6 hour day may be required or evenings or weekends which i have so far done more than any other employee, now my home life has changed i have asked just for my contracted 30 hour week which he now has me in a disciplinary meeting for other trumped up reasons while asking me to sign an agreement to a change in my contract for for the hours, can he do this???