I have a judgement against a debtor who owes me £35,000. I hope to place charges then force a sale of property he owns to get my money back. I know he owns quite a few properties he rents out. Is it possible to find out the addresses of his properties via the Land Registry? Thanks.

Thanks again.

One more thing, on the CHARGES REGISTER, there is the following:

Deeds Services, 101 Midsummer Boulevard, Milton Keynes MK9 1AA.

Does this mean there was a charge on the property on that date as well?

Thank you. Yes, I have details about the mortgage.

I am just wondering why, on the RESTRICTION , dated 14.12.2010, why only one person is mentioned in that paragraph, (the wife) even though I know this is a joint mortgage.

I have just completed a Land Registry search to find out if someone who owes me a lot of money has recently re-mortgaged his house. The property was purchased in 2006, but can someone please explain what the following means and am I correct in assuming they have remortgaged in 2008 and 2010?:

(16.07.2008) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate by

the proprietor of the registered estate is to be registered without a

written consent signed by the proprietor for the time being of the

Charge dated xx xxxx 2008 in favour of Santander UK PLC referred to in

the Charges Register.

5 (14.12.2010) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate,

other than a disposition by the proprietor of any registered charge

registered before the entry of this restriction, is to be registered

without a certificate signed by the applicant for registration or their

conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to

Northern Rock (Asset Management) PLC (Co Reg No: xxxxxx) at care of

XXXXX Solicitors, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Newcastle upon

Tyne XXXXX (Reference: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX), being the person with the

benefit of an Interim charging order on the beneficial interest of

XXXXXXXXXX (nee XXXXXXXXX) made by the Gateshead County Court

on XXXXXXXX 2010 (Court reference XXXXXXX).

Thank you.

Hi Shadow, I am not sure what you mean by "embarrased". I have simply told them the facts. Unemployed for 4 and half years, no savings, no saleable assets, unable to find suitable employment due to health reasons. I have told this to MBNA and Link Financial repeatedly, but they are still taking me to court.

Last week I received an "Allocation Questionaire" which I filled in and returned. Today I received a copy of Link Financials Allocation Questionaire which says that they "would request that the Defence be struck out and Judgement entered for those sums claimed". What does this mean? And, after repeatedly explaining to MBNA and Link Financial that I have been unemployed now for four and half years with my only income being housing benefit, I am surprised that they are taking this to court. They are hoping to get £2260 from me, What do they expect to achieve when I have no money?

Today I received a "Notice of Transfer of Proceedings" moving this to my local court. Also enclosed was a "Small Claims Mediation Service" form which claims to be a free service. But on the form it asks if I have attached a fee. I am a bit puzzled by this as it states: "An allocation fee is payable if your claim or counterclaim exceeds £1,500" I am not making a claim or counterclaim.

Thanks SG.

So, can anyone give me any advice on what to do with the Tomlin order? Should I send it back unsigned?

Thanks for the advice. What do you think I should I do next?

This was dated Feb 2006.

So how can it be legally binding without a signature?

I honestly cannot remember if I applied online. If I had applied online, surely I would have been sent forms to sign?

Thanks! Should I include the unsigned copy of the CCA as well?

I have just received a Tomlin Order from Link Financial. They said they were taking me to court for an MBNA credit card debt of £1500. I asked for a true copy of the CCA from 2006, which they sent me. Oddly, where it should be signed by myself and MBNA, there are no signatures on it. The Tomlin order asks me to pay £2269 over the next 18 years, this includes interest and fees. Is this whole thing legal?

Hi Vic, It was posted by Ell-enn on 30th Nov in the thread: "A Balliff Solution"

I rent a house, in joint names with my partner, and I have been threatened with bankruptcy over debts in my name. Can anyone let me know if the form below would actually stop baliffs from removing my personal possessions? It seems too good to be true to me

I, [name] of [address]

make the following declaration under the Statutory Declarations Act 1835

[All items contained within the property]/[All the items in the schedule below within the property...] at the above address and within it's boundaries, are owned by my partner Ms XXXXXXX]. [There are no items within the property or it's boundaries belonging to any other person.]

[Schedule

]

I make this statement conscientiously believing the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1835.

Signed:

Declared at___________________on__ ________________of 20___

Before me,

Full Name Qualification

Address

anyone?

MBNA have sold my debt to Link Financial, after months of explaining I have not worked for 4 years because of ill health and my outgoings are higher than my income, Link Financial have simply ignored my Budget Sheets.

2 weeks ago I received papers from the County Court in Northampton. I wrote to MBNA straight away and requested a copy of my CCA. So far I have not had a reply from them. I phoned the court today, and they told me to fax the papers back to them ASAP.

Does anyone know the best way to word my defence? I simply have no money to pay back the debt which is £1800.

Thank you.