In light of this [problem] 'coming out'

Would it be prudent to start making posts on the numerous websites carrying the story that ACS are not the only firm taking part in this nefarious practise.

G a l l a n t M a c m i l l a n are also following exactly the same principles?

I know that people are being accussed of uploading rather than downloading and I can understand why that is because they can charge more by saying that you allowed x amount of people to get a copy but can I ask if all someone did was download would that still not be a copyright infringement?

not necessarily so.

the way torrents work is you share tiny bits of a particular file among a large group of users.

you do not share the whole file with every user, it just wouldnt work that way.

to say they can charge more for that is wrong, you are still only uploading ONE copy or LESS of the file.

its many times faster to download than upload so by that you are never going to upload remotely close to that what you have downloaded.

the maximum they should be asking for is to cover ONE copy

When I first received my letter of claim I stupidly rang them up to ask what it was all about, they said I shared it with x amount of people.

How can they prove this?

 

i can't see how they can know who your computer is 'talking' to regarding this, so how can they possibly know how many people you have shared it with? i'd say they have either;

 

* counted how mant ppl are sharing the file and used this

* counted how mant ppl are sharing the file and guessed a proportion of this

* lied, and picked the number out of their arse

 

i believe number 3 to be most likely

 

no way for them to tell who you have shared with. they can only know that you shared with their computer