Thanks Ito. To be honest our solicitor is bloody useless, questions we answered months ago are still being asked ( I think we might have talking to the tea boy for the past year:rolleyes:). They have made us an offer on the injury side but to be honest we don't really care about that, what we are don't understand is they said there was no damage to his car/he's not claiming any damage so why 50:50? I think tomorrow will have to be shouting at people day and see if that gets us any answers. Thanks again to all who commented and please feel free to add anything else that might be relevant or of help .

We were going to go through our insurance but when they said we had to get the car repaired within 30 days of the accident and then chase the third party (who had an unlimited time to admit/partly admit liability) for the money we decided not to use them and used a solicitor instead . So basically it was all through the third party, there wasn't a claim against us put into our insurance (we are no longer with that company).

His insurance company sent an engineer down to look at the damage, and a few weeks later he (the engineer) phoned us and said he'd authorised repairs and the garage would be in touch which they were within a few days. The engineers report agreed he'd driven into us but also stated "why would my our client drive off the give way lines". I think the issue is we can't prove it happened because he drove off the line and just didn't see us sitting in front of him. We took the car in to a garage we'd choosen and it was fixed. We thought that part of the drama was all over with but his insurance have other ideas.

Hello Long story short. My partner and I were involved in an accident April 2009, (no witnesses and no photos) anyway the other driver was at fault and admitted it at the scene but will not admit liability to the insurance (daddy's insurance policy:rolleyes:) after a lot of faffing about his insurance authorised repairs (September 2009) and the car went in and was fixed. We've just received a letter saying they still want to go 50:50:confused:. Can anybody shed any light on this because as far as I'm aware paying for the repairs says they are admitting liabilty. Thankyou in advance for ANY help/advice.